The next day delivery requirement was definitely part of the justification for the later start times. It's what customers want!Mr Rush wrote: ↑Today, 16:02And in an astonishing coincidence, pushing the times back also allowed them to connect almost all T24 onto core delivery. At least up here in the Central Belt, where, I might add, 9-5 is one more push away.Martin Walsh wrote: ↑Today, 10:35The reason for the later starts was that Royal Mail ceased to use planes to carry mail which means that it arrivals later to the inward mail centre.
Royal Mail would love a 9-5 model for parcels but the union has stopped this now on four occasions dating back to 2017.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
2 in 5
-
funkflex55
- Posts: 659
- Joined: 04 Sep 2022, 22:58
- Gender: Male
Re: 2 in 5
-
twoloops
- Posts: 1965
- Joined: 24 May 2017, 20:52
- Gender: Male
- Location: Sheffield
-
Perseus
- Posts: 895
- Joined: 21 Feb 2024, 16:45
- Gender: Male
Re: 2 in 5
Unforeseen overtime will always exist, extended delivery, unexpected bulk mailing, someone phones in sick, etc. There will be little 'day off' overtime in any new system given that offices must be fully staffed.
Would you do overtime on a Saturday?
-
scotchy1962
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 829
- Joined: 25 Mar 2020, 16:55
- Gender: Male
Re: 2 in 5
Very good Martin, but it's about the only thing you've stopped.Martin Walsh wrote: ↑Today, 10:35The reason for the later starts was that Royal Mail ceased to use planes to carry mail which means that it arrivals later to the inward mail centre.
Royal Mail would love a 9-5 model for parcels but the union has stopped this now on four occasions dating back to 2017.
In fact you could probably use that fag packet the managers use to write it all down.
-
tramssirhc
- Posts: 1555
- Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
- Gender: Male
Re: 2 in 5
Martin that's not correct. The workload on the day will be whatever tasks have to be done that day. If an item has reached it's time limit it will be that days work. You also constantly ignore everything else we do. The redeliveries will be part of the days work, the special deliveries, the COLOD, the van check. We don't just deliver 1st class letters.Martin Walsh wrote: ↑Today, 08:09Yes the model is more Saturdays off as only 1st class letters and parcels are required to be delivered.
Discussions are ongoing over whether the 1st class should just come in raw to the Delivery office so it would arrive earlier. Remember first class only accounts for 8% of Royal Mails total letter volume.
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
-
tramssirhc
- Posts: 1555
- Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
- Gender: Male
Re: 2 in 5
The rotation the CWU members choose is what will be the duty pattern . If you choose 9 day fortnights the TM1 will be based on that choice. Members should vote for what they want not what they think is achievable.
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
-
tramssirhc
- Posts: 1555
- Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
- Gender: Male
Re: 2 in 5
The duty patterns are designed to fit the workload. The reason Saturday attendances are shorter is that the workload 'should' fit the duty span. Of course if there is spare capacity thats going to be used. DM26 see the return of clear offices being the standard. That's no bad thing.postslippete wrote: ↑Today, 06:40On paper, it sounds great talking about more Saturdays off but if offices are struggling for staffing then you can easily see this happening. And with Saturdays also being promised as a shorter day that only makes the staffing issue even harder if all the Tracked and priority work still has to go out.
At some point the workload has to land somewhere and most posties are wondering whether that means the remaining staff are expected to absorb more work or stay out longer.
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
-
chickenwittle
- Posts: 2064
- Joined: 15 Nov 2009, 09:43
- Gender: Male
Re: 2 in 5
Stop telling us what Royal Mail want , as if we should be grateful for what we have , it’s a ridiculous stance to keep taking.Martin Walsh wrote: ↑Today, 10:35The reason for the later starts was that Royal Mail ceased to use planes to carry mail which means that it arrivals later to the inward mail centre.
Royal Mail would love a 9-5 model for parcels but the union has stopped this now on four occasions dating back to 2017.
-
MERLIN681901
- Posts: 14
- Joined: 29 Jun 2007, 22:34
Re: 2 in 5
That’s almost where you’ve left all of us in Scotland with a 4.30 finish. So I don’t see what you’ve got to sit there congratulating yourself on. We were told there would be negotiations on moving the start times earlier again but as usual with this union all talk no action.Martin Walsh wrote: ↑Today, 10:35The reason for the later starts was that Royal Mail ceased to use planes to carry mail which means that it arrivals later to the inward mail centre.
Royal Mail would love a 9-5 model for parcels but the union has stopped this now on four occasions dating back to 2017.