Panic, panic , panic. This is what this statement shows! This is the crux time of the dispute. Dave and Andy , keep your cool, I think Thomo s in trouble !!Mungeys wrote: ↑19 Nov 2022, 11:49Team - time to update you on where we are with the talks - I have just finished a call with the CWU facilitated by ACAS - we have now given the CWU a written agreement - that in our view is very good, and includes a number of new elements that are very positive - CWU now need to read it, and reflect on it...
They must let us know on Monday whether they can accept it - or not - my team will be with them on Monday to discuss again - face to face.
But I want to be very clear - on the next day of strike action - we will stop talking.
As I said on last weeks results call - our preference, my preference is to have an agreement with the CWU so they can stand alongside us - to turn Royal Mail around.
And this is the key point - what we need to see is a behaviour change.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Thompson - New agreement sent to CWU
-
derricksmyth
- Posts: 353
- Joined: 13 Sep 2012, 17:58
- Gender: Male
Re: Thompson - New agreement sent to CWU
-
datasaint
- Posts: 1541
- Joined: 22 Sep 2008, 17:19
- Gender: Male
Re: Thompson - New agreement sent to CWU
ST and the board don't care if they don't get a deal. Why don't people grasp that at this stage.
A no-deal and further monetary loss to the business gives them all the justification they need to plough on with their own agenda.
Short of a continuous strike causing the dispute to become one of a national interest we are going to struggle to come out on top.
A no-deal and further monetary loss to the business gives them all the justification they need to plough on with their own agenda.
Short of a continuous strike causing the dispute to become one of a national interest we are going to struggle to come out on top.
-
qwerty2
- Posts: 2105
- Joined: 30 Jun 2009, 00:42
- Gender: Male
Re: Thompson - New agreement sent to CWU
They can't plough on with no business left!!!!!norm wrote: ↑19 Nov 2022, 16:52ST and the board don't care if they don't get a deal. Why don't people grasp that at this stage.
A no-deal and further monetary loss to the business gives them all the justification they need to plough on with their own agenda.
Short of a continuous strike causing the dispute to become one of a national interest we are going to struggle to come out on top.
-
49erman
- Posts: 254
- Joined: 18 Sep 2017, 13:18
- Gender: Male
Re: Thompson - New agreement sent to CWU
Regardless we’ve come to far to give up now! We are screwed if we give up, the job will be grim! So bring on the Xmas strikes and let’s see how the board and ST like this xmas and all the absolute chaos theses strikes will bring. Companies who use us are going to find a competitor and they’ll do that soon if they haven’t already……..ST needs a solution now and he knows it…… 
-
k979aaa
- Posts: 12578
- Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
- Gender: Male
- Location: THE NORTH
Re: Thompson - New agreement sent to CWU
chickenwittle wrote: ↑19 Nov 2022, 16:38Whatever terms they allow will in someday apply to us all that is the clear and present danger in the room!Murdoch wrote: ↑19 Nov 2022, 16:30So we are in agreement that all of those things are up for negotiation.chickenwittle wrote: ↑19 Nov 2022, 16:17I never said they were red lines but they are major issues that the union need to keep chipping away at and as I understand it they have already made progress in some but not yet enough.Murdoch wrote: ↑19 Nov 2022, 16:06If those are the red lines they are working with, then there's no prospect of any deal. We won't accept any changes to any of those things!chickenwittle wrote: ↑19 Nov 2022, 15:52It’s not rocket science is it , members don’t want Sunday working, later starts , worse sick pay , annualised hours etc.I can’t tell you one person in my office happy to accept this so the union have your backing to fight in all these issues.
It's way more nuanced than that, there are degrees of change within all of those things you listed.
If there genuinely is no chance of members embracing any change. Then there's no solution to this.
With a bit of mitigation, the Union could get accept those and get them past the members? Cause that's what they need to do to reach an agreement.
So hopefully it's just brinkmanship, and a deal is closer than it appears. But it all comes back to, I'd like to see the agreement currently on the table.
Everything is up for negotiations, it’s about how much realistically the union can fight off , they have already said they don’t see Sunday being an issue, that could be managed by volunteers and new recruits on new contracts. They have said there’s been movement in start times but not yet enough.
-
k979aaa
- Posts: 12578
- Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
- Gender: Male
- Location: THE NORTH
Re: Thompson - New agreement sent to CWU
chickenwittle wrote: ↑19 Nov 2022, 16:38Whatever terms they allow will in someday apply to us all that is the clear and present danger in the room!Murdoch wrote: ↑19 Nov 2022, 16:30So we are in agreement that all of those things are up for negotiation.chickenwittle wrote: ↑19 Nov 2022, 16:17I never said they were red lines but they are major issues that the union need to keep chipping away at and as I understand it they have already made progress in some but not yet enough.Murdoch wrote: ↑19 Nov 2022, 16:06If those are the red lines they are working with, then there's no prospect of any deal. We won't accept any changes to any of those things!chickenwittle wrote: ↑19 Nov 2022, 15:52It’s not rocket science is it , members don’t want Sunday working, later starts , worse sick pay , annualised hours etc.I can’t tell you one person in my office happy to accept this so the union have your backing to fight in all these issues.
It's way more nuanced than that, there are degrees of change within all of those things you listed.
If there genuinely is no chance of members embracing any change. Then there's no solution to this.
With a bit of mitigation, the Union could get accept those and get them past the members? Cause that's what they need to do to reach an agreement.
So hopefully it's just brinkmanship, and a deal is closer than it appears. But it all comes back to, I'd like to see the agreement currently on the table.
Everything is up for negotiations, it’s about how much realistically the union can fight off , they have already said they don’t see Sunday being an issue, that could be managed by volunteers and new recruits on new contracts. They have said there’s been movement in start times but not yet enough.
-
datasaint
- Posts: 1541
- Joined: 22 Sep 2008, 17:19
- Gender: Male
Re: Thompson - New agreement sent to CWU
Well if a takeover and sell off of GLS is their aim then, Royal Mail as we know it today won't be part of that plan. They'll TUPE everyone then set about changing contracts asap.qwerty2 wrote: ↑19 Nov 2022, 16:56They can't plough on with no business left!!!!!norm wrote: ↑19 Nov 2022, 16:52ST and the board don't care if they don't get a deal. Why don't people grasp that at this stage.
A no-deal and further monetary loss to the business gives them all the justification they need to plough on with their own agenda.
Short of a continuous strike causing the dispute to become one of a national interest we are going to struggle to come out on top.
-
CRIBMAD
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 835
- Joined: 11 Oct 2016, 13:38
- Gender: Male
Re: Thompson - New agreement sent to CWU
49erman wrote: ↑19 Nov 2022, 16:57Regardless we’ve come to far to give up now! We are screwed if we give up, the job will be grim! So bring on the Xmas strikes and let’s see how the board and ST like this xmas and all the absolute chaos theses strikes will bring. Companies who use us are going to find a competitor and they’ll do that soon if they haven’t already……..ST needs a solution now and he knows it……![]()
in the words of Kenny Roger's The gambler - "you got to know when to hold them and know when to fold them " well done cwu tell him to accept your deal or go do one !!
-
Murdoch
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 572
- Joined: 11 Apr 2018, 16:55
- Gender: Male
Re: Thompson - New agreement sent to CWU
Yeah, they've said as much. A "no deal" outcome, would make the sell off of GLS much easier, they've been threatening this for months.norm wrote: ↑19 Nov 2022, 17:01Well if a takeover and sell off of GLS is their aim then, Royal Mail as we know it today won't be part of that plan. They'll TUPE everyone then set about changing contracts asap.qwerty2 wrote: ↑19 Nov 2022, 16:56They can't plough on with no business left!!!!!norm wrote: ↑19 Nov 2022, 16:52ST and the board don't care if they don't get a deal. Why don't people grasp that at this stage.
A no-deal and further monetary loss to the business gives them all the justification they need to plough on with their own agenda.
Short of a continuous strike causing the dispute to become one of a national interest we are going to struggle to come out on top.
They'll split up the company, it'll be mass redundancies. Whatever is left of Royal Mail could potentially go into special administration.
I'm not sure how much pressure the Board are under to resolve this. I'm leaning towards, they don't really care. They'll all get huge payoffs when GLS is sold off.
It's a risky strategy for them too, especially politically, but genuinely, I don't think they care. There's a lot of money to be made in asset stripping.
There's literally no way us workers come out well, in the event of no agreement being reached.
-
k979aaa
- Posts: 12578
- Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
- Gender: Male
- Location: THE NORTH
Re: Thompson - New agreement sent to CWU
why we are on s**t terms already maybe matt hancock will do it as a challenge and f**k offnorm wrote: ↑19 Nov 2022, 17:01Well if a takeover and sell off of GLS is their aim then, Royal Mail as we know it today won't be part of that plan. They'll TUPE everyone then set about changing contracts asap.qwerty2 wrote: ↑19 Nov 2022, 16:56They can't plough on with no business left!!!!!norm wrote: ↑19 Nov 2022, 16:52ST and the board don't care if they don't get a deal. Why don't people grasp that at this stage.
A no-deal and further monetary loss to the business gives them all the justification they need to plough on with their own agenda.
Short of a continuous strike causing the dispute to become one of a national interest we are going to struggle to come out on top.
-
Clappedoutpostie
- Posts: 1262
- Joined: 05 Nov 2021, 21:46
- Gender: Male
-
Darwin
- Posts: 35
- Joined: 07 Apr 2022, 19:24
- Gender: Male
Re: Thompson - New agreement sent to CWU
I dont know who ST boss is but how can he not be sacked and how can they possibly think he's doing a good job!
I suppose if the shareholders are his boss he will keep his job. They will be delighted with the dividends hes paying.
I suppose if the shareholders are his boss he will keep his job. They will be delighted with the dividends hes paying.
-
frankieboy
- Posts: 303
- Joined: 12 May 2008, 18:34
Re: Thompson - New agreement sent to CWU
An all out strike is the only way to win this.
-
k979aaa
- Posts: 12578
- Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
- Gender: Male
- Location: THE NORTH
Re: Thompson - New agreement sent to CWU
The CEO is he boss if he told you to jump out that window 30 floors up would you do it!
-
toonshola
- Posts: 915
- Joined: 29 Jul 2011, 16:31
- Gender: Male
Re: Thompson - New agreement sent to CWU
People saying on here and on the CWUs Facebook that Thompson is panicking and in trouble need to slap themselves back to reality. One of two things is going to happen next week, the Cwu will fold and agree to the shambolic deal on offer or Thompson will smile and walk away from talks and implement everything they want anyway and there is absolutely nothing we or the Cwu can do about it. The union messed this up months ago and are now scrambling around trying to save face.
Also where is the union’s alternative plan to turn the business around that they promised a few weeks back?
Also where is the union’s alternative plan to turn the business around that they promised a few weeks back?