ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Members update
-
spen
- Posts: 531
- Joined: 18 Jan 2011, 19:53
- Gender: Male
Re: Members update
In my office one of the biggest issue is the move to later start and finish times,,, I havnt heard anyone from the union mention anything about it,,, has this just been accepted as going ahead now ?
-
Nickvilla20
- Posts: 787
- Joined: 13 May 2013, 07:30
- Gender: Male
Re: Members update
I think It’s now guaranteed we will be starting later. Not personally an issue for me but it will be for the majority.
-
Woody Guthrie
- Posts: 5166
- Joined: 29 Sep 2018, 20:47
- Gender: Male
Re: Members update
They aren't.SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑06 Nov 2022, 18:17Someone mentioned in another thread that their DO will be getting all the large parcels back starting in the new year, which makes me think that RM are abandoning the idea of local parcel hubs
It is included in Royal Mail's latest proposal.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Only dead fish follow the current
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 12163
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
Re: Members update
Why then would someone have been told my management at their DO that they'll be delivering all their own large again from the New Year?Woody Guthrie wrote: ↑06 Nov 2022, 18:34They aren't.SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑06 Nov 2022, 18:17Someone mentioned in another thread that their DO will be getting all the large parcels back starting in the new year, which makes me think that RM are abandoning the idea of local parcel hubs
It is included in Royal Mail's latest proposal.
_20221106_183304.JPG
-
clashcityrocker
- Posts: 16672
- Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
- Gender: Male
- Location: strummerville
Re: Members update
Someone said someone else said something.SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑06 Nov 2022, 19:07
Why then would someone have been told by management at their DO that they'll be delivering all their own large again from the New Year?
We used to call it Chinese whispers before we were woke.
There is a persistent rumour at my DO that the dedicated parcel duties are being done away with in the New Year and we are having a re-sign.
For some it is a guaranteed FACT. It is still nonsense.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
-
Pidleypoo
- Posts: 705
- Joined: 17 Dec 2014, 10:05
- Gender: Male
Re: Members update
Just on the office having large parcels back after having specific parcel duties , that was me and it is 100% happening in January.
As for the rest , if the union agree to commit to deliver, banking of hours and flexing time on a daily basis , not only will I leave the union , I’ll make sure I get as many as I can to leave it too.
It will show they’ve got absolutely not a f**king clue about what we’re really worried about.
As for the rest , if the union agree to commit to deliver, banking of hours and flexing time on a daily basis , not only will I leave the union , I’ll make sure I get as many as I can to leave it too.
It will show they’ve got absolutely not a f**king clue about what we’re really worried about.
-
DirtyHarry
- Posts: 5051
- Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
- Gender: Male
- Location: London
Re: Members update
TopperGas wrote: ↑06 Nov 2022, 17:56f**k that then. It's bad enough now trying to tell a manager there's too much f***ing work, and not enough time to do it in, even though it's blindingly obvious, I won't be sticking around too long for another increase in the absolute fuckwittery that is our stinking job.DirtyHarry wrote: ↑06 Nov 2022, 17:49
Depending where you work I sense the move to parcel hubs is inevitable and that will lead to rounds increasing in size. I can't see the RM stepping back from removing the allowances.
-
POSTMAN
- SITE ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 32777
- Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
- Gender: Male
Re: Members update
Stuart MacDonald
IR Director
We have put together a new pay-for-change offer which is the maximum it can be under the
circumstances. I need to make it very clear, there is no scope for any further increase to this
pay-for-change offer.
LTB 431/22 - ROYAL MAIL GROUP: PAY AND CHANGE DISPUTES-RE FACEBOOK LIVE
IR Director
We have put together a new pay-for-change offer which is the maximum it can be under the
circumstances. I need to make it very clear, there is no scope for any further increase to this
pay-for-change offer.
LTB 431/22 - ROYAL MAIL GROUP: PAY AND CHANGE DISPUTES-RE FACEBOOK LIVE
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
-
Clappedoutpostie
- Posts: 1262
- Joined: 05 Nov 2021, 21:46
- Gender: Male
Re: Members update
Is this a new maximum, the last maximum or the 1st maximum?POSTMAN wrote: ↑06 Nov 2022, 20:23Stuart MacDonald
IR Director
We have put together a new pay-for-change offer which is the maximum it can be under the
circumstances. I need to make it very clear, there is no scope for any further increase to this
pay-for-change offer.
LTB 431/22 - ROYAL MAIL GROUP: PAY AND CHANGE DISPUTES-RE FACEBOOK LIVE
-
TopperGas
- Posts: 3500
- Joined: 13 Feb 2021, 22:46
- Gender: Male
Re: Members update
The Q&A document on Workplace says the same thing, I'm not really sure why the ballot or strikes have been cancelled if RM have no intention of increasing their offer, if they do intend increasing the offer then I've no idea why ACAS has allowed they to publish the Q&A document if it's incorrect.POSTMAN wrote: ↑06 Nov 2022, 20:23Stuart MacDonald
IR Director
We have put together a new pay-for-change offer which is the maximum it can be under the
circumstances. I need to make it very clear, there is no scope for any further increase to this
pay-for-change offer.
LTB 431/22 - ROYAL MAIL GROUP: PAY AND CHANGE DISPUTES-RE FACEBOOK LIVE
-
Martin Walsh
- Posts: 4276
- Joined: 19 Sep 2007, 20:12
- Location: neverland
Re: Members update
Woody we are mostly in agreement on the issues you have highlighted.
There better not be annualised hours. No chance of us agreeing this but there will be seasonal variations to ensure productivity does not drop.
There better not be flexi-hours. No chance of no finishing times and this.
There better not be bench merging. It does not work we run trials and it could not work. I think Royal Mail want to have the IPS and prep done in mail centres and again this is unacceptable.
There better not be commit to deliver. Royal Mail have run a trial without union involvement on and this is clearly targeted at reducing CSP Hours. This is a new proposal and we need to understand what they are actually saying and the impact from this.
There better not be performance "management". I am a no to any individual performance standard and have always been.
Never mind acceptable solutions, these are unacceptable in any form.
There better not be annualised hours. No chance of us agreeing this but there will be seasonal variations to ensure productivity does not drop.
There better not be flexi-hours. No chance of no finishing times and this.
There better not be bench merging. It does not work we run trials and it could not work. I think Royal Mail want to have the IPS and prep done in mail centres and again this is unacceptable.
There better not be commit to deliver. Royal Mail have run a trial without union involvement on and this is clearly targeted at reducing CSP Hours. This is a new proposal and we need to understand what they are actually saying and the impact from this.
There better not be performance "management". I am a no to any individual performance standard and have always been.
Never mind acceptable solutions, these are unacceptable in any form.
-
pieoftheday
- Posts: 1838
- Joined: 11 Mar 2010, 16:43
- Gender: Male
Re: Members update
We're already delivering our own large stuff at our D.Oclashcityrocker wrote: ↑06 Nov 2022, 19:39Someone said someone else said something.SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑06 Nov 2022, 19:07
Why then would someone have been told by management at their DO that they'll be delivering all their own large again from the New Year?
We used to call it Chinese whispers before we were woke.
There is a persistent rumour at my DO that the dedicated parcel duties are being done away with in the New Year and we are having a re-sign.
For some it is a guaranteed FACT. It is still nonsense.
-
pieoftheday
- Posts: 1838
- Joined: 11 Mar 2010, 16:43
- Gender: Male
Re: Members update
pieoftheday wrote: ↑07 Nov 2022, 18:36We're already delivering our own large stuff at our D.O. mind you something has to give so a few loops are left inclashcityrocker wrote: ↑06 Nov 2022, 19:39Someone said someone else said something.SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑06 Nov 2022, 19:07
Why then would someone have been told by management at their DO that they'll be delivering all their own large again from the New Year?
We used to call it Chinese whispers before we were woke.
There is a persistent rumour at my DO that the dedicated parcel duties are being done away with in the New Year and we are having a re-sign.
For some it is a guaranteed FACT. It is still nonsense.
-
TopperGas
- Posts: 3500
- Joined: 13 Feb 2021, 22:46
- Gender: Male
Re: Members update
Our DO is based a minimum of 30 minutes away from the proposed parcel hub, I can see it makes any sense to send a fleet of vans on a 60 mins round trips to deliver large parcels, when there's already a fleet of vans capable of doing that based at our DO.
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 12163
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
Re: Members update
It would be physically impossible for it to happen anyway, no MC would have the floor space, especially MCs that have got PSMs in, most MCs don't have any spare floor space as it is, with one shift's storage area being another shifts work area. They'd also need to employ way more staff, as we're well short staffed as it is, with probably at least a dozen casuals/agency in most nights, often in the summer as wellMartin Walsh wrote: ↑07 Nov 2022, 18:32I think Royal Mail want to have the IPS and prep done in mail centres and again this is unacceptable.