ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

reasons to reject the deal

Pay talks 2022 discussion, news, LTB's RMCtv and all BUSINESS RECOVERY, TRANSFORMATION AND GROWTH AGREEMENT chat
freespeech
MDEC
Posts: 762
Joined: 28 Jun 2007, 16:35

Re: reasons to reject the deal

Post by freespeech »

denhamhoop wrote:
09 May 2023, 09:29
JasonLock130 wrote:
09 May 2023, 08:49
DirtyHarry wrote:
08 May 2023, 19:51
What is in this deal, worthy of a postal worker voting Yes?

I can't see anything. Not a single damn thing.
I see stability in voting yes, 6% is better than many others are getting.

As for the sick pay, that is still better than many other industries, and some colleagues have been known to take the micky, putting extra work on colleagues.

Regarding revisions, if a round is not achievable, then it will just fail. I for one will continue to do my best, and if extra hours are needed to compete I can do overtime to earn more money, or go home and not complete.

You can't get forced to work over your contracted hours, and at the end of the day it is not life or death if someone is dissatisfied that there mail is late.
It could be life or death if it is a NHS Appointment Letter that doesn't get delivered until after the due date for a Cancer check or Heart Condition where sometimes a days delay can make a real difference especially with how hard it is to get Appointments in general
Having real world experience of these letters they are almost always confirmation with the actual appointment also being confirmed by email, text or a call.
greengiant
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1268
Joined: 24 Mar 2014, 19:40
Gender: Male

Re: reasons to reject the deal

Post by greengiant »

freespeech wrote:
09 May 2023, 10:38
denhamhoop wrote:
09 May 2023, 09:29
JasonLock130 wrote:
09 May 2023, 08:49
DirtyHarry wrote:
08 May 2023, 19:51
What is in this deal, worthy of a postal worker voting Yes?

I can't see anything. Not a single damn thing.
I see stability in voting yes, 6% is better than many others are getting.

As for the sick pay, that is still better than many other industries, and some colleagues have been known to take the micky, putting extra work on colleagues.

Regarding revisions, if a round is not achievable, then it will just fail. I for one will continue to do my best, and if extra hours are needed to compete I can do overtime to earn more money, or go home and not complete.

You can't get forced to work over your contracted hours, and at the end of the day it is not life or death if someone is dissatisfied that there mail is late.
It could be life or death if it is a NHS Appointment Letter that doesn't get delivered until after the due date for a Cancer check or Heart Condition where sometimes a days delay can make a real difference especially with how hard it is to get Appointments in general
Having real world experience of these letters they are almost always confirmation with the actual appointment also being confirmed by email, text or a call.
Ive never had email / text / phone calls about consultant appointments. In my NHS area they only send consultant appointments out by letter, same goes with appointments for mri scans.
denhamhoop
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 303
Joined: 07 Oct 2010, 19:53
Gender: Male

Re: reasons to reject the deal

Post by denhamhoop »

I have never received an email or text from my Medical Practice
DirtyHarry
Posts: 5051
Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
Gender: Male
Location: London

Re: reasons to reject the deal

Post by DirtyHarry »

LouBarlow wrote:
08 May 2023, 21:35
DirtyHarry wrote:
08 May 2023, 19:51
What is in this deal, worthy of a postal worker voting Yes?

I can't see anything. Not a single damn thing.
You can’t see more money and a lump sum? Have you read it?
I wasn't bothered about a paltry pay rise, or the pitiful £500 lump sum, which after tax will look even more pitiful, but I'm glad you're that easily pleased.
DirtyHarry
Posts: 5051
Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
Gender: Male
Location: London

Re: reasons to reject the deal

Post by DirtyHarry »

sweepster70 wrote:
08 May 2023, 21:33
DirtyHarry wrote:
08 May 2023, 19:51
What is in this deal, worthy of a postal worker voting Yes?

I can't see anything. Not a single damn thing.

This is your own personal view, is it not?
Others might see a different view.
You are right in your own mind, others are right in their's.
And?
DirtyHarry
Posts: 5051
Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
Gender: Male
Location: London

Re: reasons to reject the deal

Post by DirtyHarry »

JasonLock130 wrote:
09 May 2023, 08:49
DirtyHarry wrote:
08 May 2023, 19:51
What is in this deal, worthy of a postal worker voting Yes?

I can't see anything. Not a single damn thing.
I see stability in voting yes, 6% is better than many others are getting.

As for the sick pay, that is still better than many other industries, and some colleagues have been known to take the micky, putting extra work on colleagues.

Regarding revisions, if a round is not achievable, then it will just fail. I for one will continue to do my best, and if extra hours are needed to compete I can do overtime to earn more money, or go home and not complete.

You can't get forced to work over your contracted hours, and at the end of the day it is not life or death if someone is dissatisfied that there mail is late.
Very profound. :crazy:
ted_e_bear
Posts: 3932
Joined: 03 Sep 2012, 19:37
Gender: Male

Re: reasons to reject the deal

Post by ted_e_bear »

LouBarlow wrote:
08 May 2023, 21:35
DirtyHarry wrote:
08 May 2023, 19:51
What is in this deal, worthy of a postal worker voting Yes?

I can't see anything. Not a single damn thing.
You can’t see more money and a lump sum? Have you read it?
I can see that but much more importantly I can also see having to work more in the winter period which to be absolutely clear I'm dreading, just like a lot of my delivery colleagues I'm knocking on a bit now, my knees hurt,my legs hurt and my feet hurt, that aspect of the deal for me is unacceptable.
enskied
Posts: 1876
Joined: 16 Aug 2013, 17:14
Gender: Male

Re: reasons to reject the deal

Post by enskied »

There is nothing attractive in this deal .
Nothing I could accept.
steve2zaf
Posts: 76
Joined: 22 Jan 2010, 16:21
Gender: Male

Re: reasons to reject the deal

Post by steve2zaf »

The deal has to be the worst EVER - portrayed as a victory . Only a corrupt union can actually say this is a " ground breaking deal ".
billycat
Posts: 131
Joined: 24 Jul 2012, 20:40
Gender: Male

Re: reasons to reject the deal

Post by billycat »

There is a lot of angry people regarding the deal which i agree is terrible, what we all need to understand this job is no longer a job for life the days of 30 years service going forward are gone but one thing is for sure with or without a yes vote the changes are happening more strikes are a complete waste of time in my opinion so going forward if all the changes become two much for me to stomach i will offer my services elsewhere.
Nickvilla20
Posts: 782
Joined: 13 May 2013, 07:30
Gender: Male

Re: reasons to reject the deal

Post by Nickvilla20 »

billycat wrote:
10 May 2023, 11:53
There is a lot of angry people regarding the deal which i agree is terrible, what we all need to understand this job is no longer a job for life the days of 30 years service going forward are gone but one thing is for sure with or without a yes vote the changes are happening more strikes are a complete waste of time in my opinion so going forward if all the changes become two much for me to stomach i will offer my services elsewhere.
It’s now just another private company where people might stay for a few years then move on. It’s sad it’s gone this way but it was always coming at some point.

If we vote no then we need to be prepared for an indefinite all out strike because that’s the only thing we haven’t done yet. I’m not sure how many would be I know I wouldn’t.
X_hamster
Posts: 96
Joined: 07 Feb 2013, 10:53
Gender: Male

Re: reasons to reject the deal

Post by X_hamster »

In all seriousness are there any reasons to accept the deal.

It will be a landslide no vote, and morally and rightfully correct

Looked at their latest video from york and the comments are swamped with no's and many valid points and queries. Not even the odd support post now
scoobymunster
Posts: 346
Joined: 30 Mar 2011, 00:39
Gender: Male

Re: reasons to reject the deal

Post by scoobymunster »

The Union claims this is the best deal that could be had, considering what Royal Mail initially wanted. A no vote wouldn't prevent some of these changes coming in via Executive Action. Considering Royal Mail often disregarded our previous Agreements, who's to say a yes vote won't stop further EA regardless? I work the same hours every day/week. Not a hope I'm working extra this winter.
jahbalon
Posts: 149
Joined: 21 Apr 2023, 18:43
Gender: Male

Re: reasons to reject the deal

Post by jahbalon »

It's all changed now. Thompson is gone. A brighter future is coming for all postal workers, I can feel it in my water. :nana

I'm voting yes and encouraging all you dissenters to see the light too, and vote yes for your brighter future, and for all your families and dependents. :dance

Don't plunge them into any more misery, fear and want. :no no
redlen
Posts: 1331
Joined: 21 Dec 2021, 12:05
Gender: Male

Re: reasons to reject the deal

Post by redlen »

Cannot see how you even consider new sunny uplands with a new CEO on past occupants of that position.