Having real world experience of these letters they are almost always confirmation with the actual appointment also being confirmed by email, text or a call.denhamhoop wrote: ↑09 May 2023, 09:29It could be life or death if it is a NHS Appointment Letter that doesn't get delivered until after the due date for a Cancer check or Heart Condition where sometimes a days delay can make a real difference especially with how hard it is to get Appointments in generalJasonLock130 wrote: ↑09 May 2023, 08:49I see stability in voting yes, 6% is better than many others are getting.DirtyHarry wrote: ↑08 May 2023, 19:51What is in this deal, worthy of a postal worker voting Yes?
I can't see anything. Not a single damn thing.
As for the sick pay, that is still better than many other industries, and some colleagues have been known to take the micky, putting extra work on colleagues.
Regarding revisions, if a round is not achievable, then it will just fail. I for one will continue to do my best, and if extra hours are needed to compete I can do overtime to earn more money, or go home and not complete.
You can't get forced to work over your contracted hours, and at the end of the day it is not life or death if someone is dissatisfied that there mail is late.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
reasons to reject the deal
-
freespeech
- MDEC
- Posts: 762
- Joined: 28 Jun 2007, 16:35
Re: reasons to reject the deal
-
greengiant
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: 24 Mar 2014, 19:40
- Gender: Male
Re: reasons to reject the deal
Ive never had email / text / phone calls about consultant appointments. In my NHS area they only send consultant appointments out by letter, same goes with appointments for mri scans.freespeech wrote: ↑09 May 2023, 10:38Having real world experience of these letters they are almost always confirmation with the actual appointment also being confirmed by email, text or a call.denhamhoop wrote: ↑09 May 2023, 09:29It could be life or death if it is a NHS Appointment Letter that doesn't get delivered until after the due date for a Cancer check or Heart Condition where sometimes a days delay can make a real difference especially with how hard it is to get Appointments in generalJasonLock130 wrote: ↑09 May 2023, 08:49I see stability in voting yes, 6% is better than many others are getting.DirtyHarry wrote: ↑08 May 2023, 19:51What is in this deal, worthy of a postal worker voting Yes?
I can't see anything. Not a single damn thing.
As for the sick pay, that is still better than many other industries, and some colleagues have been known to take the micky, putting extra work on colleagues.
Regarding revisions, if a round is not achievable, then it will just fail. I for one will continue to do my best, and if extra hours are needed to compete I can do overtime to earn more money, or go home and not complete.
You can't get forced to work over your contracted hours, and at the end of the day it is not life or death if someone is dissatisfied that there mail is late.
-
denhamhoop
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 303
- Joined: 07 Oct 2010, 19:53
- Gender: Male
Re: reasons to reject the deal
I have never received an email or text from my Medical Practice
-
DirtyHarry
- Posts: 5051
- Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
- Gender: Male
- Location: London
Re: reasons to reject the deal
I wasn't bothered about a paltry pay rise, or the pitiful £500 lump sum, which after tax will look even more pitiful, but I'm glad you're that easily pleased.LouBarlow wrote: ↑08 May 2023, 21:35You can’t see more money and a lump sum? Have you read it?DirtyHarry wrote: ↑08 May 2023, 19:51What is in this deal, worthy of a postal worker voting Yes?
I can't see anything. Not a single damn thing.
-
DirtyHarry
- Posts: 5051
- Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
- Gender: Male
- Location: London
Re: reasons to reject the deal
And?sweepster70 wrote: ↑08 May 2023, 21:33DirtyHarry wrote: ↑08 May 2023, 19:51What is in this deal, worthy of a postal worker voting Yes?
I can't see anything. Not a single damn thing.
This is your own personal view, is it not?
Others might see a different view.
You are right in your own mind, others are right in their's.
-
DirtyHarry
- Posts: 5051
- Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
- Gender: Male
- Location: London
Re: reasons to reject the deal
Very profound.JasonLock130 wrote: ↑09 May 2023, 08:49I see stability in voting yes, 6% is better than many others are getting.DirtyHarry wrote: ↑08 May 2023, 19:51What is in this deal, worthy of a postal worker voting Yes?
I can't see anything. Not a single damn thing.
As for the sick pay, that is still better than many other industries, and some colleagues have been known to take the micky, putting extra work on colleagues.
Regarding revisions, if a round is not achievable, then it will just fail. I for one will continue to do my best, and if extra hours are needed to compete I can do overtime to earn more money, or go home and not complete.
You can't get forced to work over your contracted hours, and at the end of the day it is not life or death if someone is dissatisfied that there mail is late.
-
ted_e_bear
- Posts: 3932
- Joined: 03 Sep 2012, 19:37
- Gender: Male
Re: reasons to reject the deal
I can see that but much more importantly I can also see having to work more in the winter period which to be absolutely clear I'm dreading, just like a lot of my delivery colleagues I'm knocking on a bit now, my knees hurt,my legs hurt and my feet hurt, that aspect of the deal for me is unacceptable.LouBarlow wrote: ↑08 May 2023, 21:35You can’t see more money and a lump sum? Have you read it?DirtyHarry wrote: ↑08 May 2023, 19:51What is in this deal, worthy of a postal worker voting Yes?
I can't see anything. Not a single damn thing.
-
enskied
- Posts: 1876
- Joined: 16 Aug 2013, 17:14
- Gender: Male
Re: reasons to reject the deal
There is nothing attractive in this deal .
Nothing I could accept.
Nothing I could accept.
-
steve2zaf
- Posts: 76
- Joined: 22 Jan 2010, 16:21
- Gender: Male
Re: reasons to reject the deal
The deal has to be the worst EVER - portrayed as a victory . Only a corrupt union can actually say this is a " ground breaking deal ".
-
billycat
- Posts: 131
- Joined: 24 Jul 2012, 20:40
- Gender: Male
Re: reasons to reject the deal
There is a lot of angry people regarding the deal which i agree is terrible, what we all need to understand this job is no longer a job for life the days of 30 years service going forward are gone but one thing is for sure with or without a yes vote the changes are happening more strikes are a complete waste of time in my opinion so going forward if all the changes become two much for me to stomach i will offer my services elsewhere.
-
Nickvilla20
- Posts: 782
- Joined: 13 May 2013, 07:30
- Gender: Male
Re: reasons to reject the deal
It’s now just another private company where people might stay for a few years then move on. It’s sad it’s gone this way but it was always coming at some point.billycat wrote: ↑10 May 2023, 11:53There is a lot of angry people regarding the deal which i agree is terrible, what we all need to understand this job is no longer a job for life the days of 30 years service going forward are gone but one thing is for sure with or without a yes vote the changes are happening more strikes are a complete waste of time in my opinion so going forward if all the changes become two much for me to stomach i will offer my services elsewhere.
If we vote no then we need to be prepared for an indefinite all out strike because that’s the only thing we haven’t done yet. I’m not sure how many would be I know I wouldn’t.
-
X_hamster
- Posts: 96
- Joined: 07 Feb 2013, 10:53
- Gender: Male
Re: reasons to reject the deal
In all seriousness are there any reasons to accept the deal.
It will be a landslide no vote, and morally and rightfully correct
Looked at their latest video from york and the comments are swamped with no's and many valid points and queries. Not even the odd support post now
It will be a landslide no vote, and morally and rightfully correct
Looked at their latest video from york and the comments are swamped with no's and many valid points and queries. Not even the odd support post now
-
scoobymunster
- Posts: 346
- Joined: 30 Mar 2011, 00:39
- Gender: Male
Re: reasons to reject the deal
The Union claims this is the best deal that could be had, considering what Royal Mail initially wanted. A no vote wouldn't prevent some of these changes coming in via Executive Action. Considering Royal Mail often disregarded our previous Agreements, who's to say a yes vote won't stop further EA regardless? I work the same hours every day/week. Not a hope I'm working extra this winter.
-
jahbalon
- Posts: 149
- Joined: 21 Apr 2023, 18:43
- Gender: Male
Re: reasons to reject the deal
It's all changed now. Thompson is gone. A brighter future is coming for all postal workers, I can feel it in my water.
I'm voting yes and encouraging all you dissenters to see the light too, and vote yes for your brighter future, and for all your families and dependents.
Don't plunge them into any more misery, fear and want.
I'm voting yes and encouraging all you dissenters to see the light too, and vote yes for your brighter future, and for all your families and dependents.
Don't plunge them into any more misery, fear and want.
-
redlen
- Posts: 1331
- Joined: 21 Dec 2021, 12:05
- Gender: Male
Re: reasons to reject the deal
Cannot see how you even consider new sunny uplands with a new CEO on past occupants of that position.