ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
Numberone63
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 621
Joined: 05 Sep 2017, 18:38
Gender: Male

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by Numberone63 »

So our office left 15 rounds in the other day. That’s not ‘officially’ in trouble. Fine.
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32588
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by POSTMAN »

We're sorry for any inconvenience and thank you for your understanding. We will regularly update customers on the offices most impacted here:

1

Chulmleigh DO (EX18)
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32588
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by POSTMAN »

0

Well done team. :nana
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32588
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by POSTMAN »

We're sorry for any inconvenience and thank you for your understanding. We will regularly update customers on the offices most impacted here:

1

Thetford DO (IP24, IP25 and IP26)
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
Chelseablue
Posts: 2088
Joined: 19 Aug 2013, 14:33
Gender: Female

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by Chelseablue »

How many jobs down to get on this list?? Our offices are both struggling
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32588
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by POSTMAN »

Units that report three consecutive days of 30% of DPs failing USO gets you on the list and public RM service disruption website. Then you need three consecutive days below 30% to get off the list (well below and back to stable USO).
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32588
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by POSTMAN »

0

Well done team. :nana

Till the next time. :cuppa
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
Mr Rush
Posts: 2863
Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 14:27
Gender: Male

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by Mr Rush »

POSTMAN wrote:
11 May 2022, 21:12
Units that report three consecutive days of 30% of DPs failing USO gets you on the list and public RM service disruption website. Then you need three consecutive days below 30% to get off the list (well below and back to stable USO).
I know the line has to be drawn somewhere, but will we ever know how many offices are sitting just shy at 29%? And since it's self-reported, how many are fudging the numbers by 1% to avoid attention? I see walks failing up and down the aisles every day, evidently less than 30% since we're not on the list, so the entire country could be sitting at that seemingly-acceptable level of service failure.
The machine stops.
POSTPERSON50
Posts: 511
Joined: 21 Oct 2021, 11:09
Gender: Female

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by POSTPERSON50 »

Mr Rush wrote:
13 May 2022, 17:18
POSTMAN wrote:
11 May 2022, 21:12
Units that report three consecutive days of 30% of DPs failing USO gets you on the list and public RM service disruption website. Then you need three consecutive days below 30% to get off the list (well below and back to stable USO).
I know the line has to be drawn somewhere, but will we ever know how many offices are sitting just shy at 29%? And since it's self-reported, how many are fudging the numbers by 1% to avoid attention? I see walks failing up and down the aisles every day, evidently less than 30% since we're not on the list, so the entire country could be sitting at that seemingly-acceptable level of service failure.
Royal Mail doesn't do transparency. It's why nothing ever gets resolved or improved upon, because we pretend everything is okay.

The media and the therefore the general public are fooled by it, but none of the staff are. There is a network of fudging in play from the chief on down. You only need to view the average 'Have your say' staff survey, when do any of those concerns ever get addressed? Headquarters will spin the poor numbers into a false positive, pretending everything went better than expected and its 'thanks for your comments, we are getting there, well done everyone'.

The firm needs a complete overhaul.
SpacePhoenix
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 11810
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
Gender: Male

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by SpacePhoenix »

Any given item of mail can only ever fail once. I wonder what the figures would look like if any given item of mail were to be classed has having failed on each day that it hasn't physically gone out on delivery (and delivery attempted) or been processed and sent on to the next office along the line
POSTPERSON50
Posts: 511
Joined: 21 Oct 2021, 11:09
Gender: Female

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by POSTPERSON50 »

SpacePhoenix wrote:
14 May 2022, 07:28
Any given item of mail can only ever fail once. I wonder what the figures would look like if any given item of mail were to be classed has having failed on each day that it hasn't physically gone out on delivery (and delivery attempted) or been processed and sent on to the next office along the line
Throughout the pandemic, I was told to report failed walks on a rotational basis, never the same walk number on consecutive days despite the mail being undelivered and piling up on the delivery frame for many days. This gave the impression that all mail on each individual walk was being cleared within 48 hours. I know as a fact this was happening across the region. If a customer complained that they hadn't received mail for a while, customer service would refer to the reported failure 'grid' and incorrectly inform the customer that our failure report showed that the mail for that address was delivered in full every 2 days at the very latest.
POSTPERSON50
Posts: 511
Joined: 21 Oct 2021, 11:09
Gender: Female

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by POSTPERSON50 »

POSTPERSON50 wrote:
14 May 2022, 08:29
SpacePhoenix wrote:
14 May 2022, 07:28
Any given item of mail can only ever fail once. I wonder what the figures would look like if any given item of mail were to be classed has having failed on each day that it hasn't physically gone out on delivery (and delivery attempted) or been processed and sent on to the next office along the line
Throughout the pandemic, I was told to report failed walks on a rotational basis, never the same walk number on consecutive days despite the mail being undelivered and piling up on the delivery frame for many days. This gave the impression that all mail on each individual walk was being cleared within 48 hours. I know as a fact this was happening across the region. If a customer complained that they hadn't received mail for a while, customer service would refer to the reported failure 'grid' and incorrectly inform the customer that our failure report showed that the mail for that address was delivered in full every 2 days at the very latest.
Just to add to this, 'part walk failure' was the reason added. This is extremely vague. The mail would have been piling up on a frame for 3 days, as long as someone was taking the tracked items, that walk was entered as a part walk failure. Other rounds in the same position had one loop taken out on delivery so was then added as a part walk failure. The managers had to declare an overall number of items failed, that number was decided depending on traffic and sickness levels. If a few sick had returned, the number of reported failed items was lowered. If traffic was lower than expected I was told to report a better clearance rate than the previous day. It all gave the false impression of control which is now the business operates in general.
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32588
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by POSTMAN »

We're sorry for any inconvenience and thank you for your understanding. We will regularly update customers on the offices most impacted here:

1

Latchingdon SPDO (CM3 6)
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32588
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by POSTMAN »

0
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32588
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by POSTMAN »

We're sorry for any inconvenience and thank you for your understanding. We will regularly update customers on the offices most impacted here:

1

South Ockendon DO (RM15)
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.