backpay

[daveyeff]

paid 26th Feb

[twoloops]

You can keep it along with your Christmas stamps, killer shoes, un-waterproof coats & cheap scabby face masks, shambles

[daveyeff]

you can always donate it if you don't want it.

[GRS]

You can keep it along with your Christmas stamps, killer shoes, un-waterproof coats & cheap scabby face masks, shambles

Really???

[aiden01]

paid 26th Feb

Has this been confirmed just asking btw.

[Martin Walsh]

CF862B33-5FDF-4802-BBD1-B114982693B9.jpeg

[cobrakai]

Nice spin that 91 percent of union members voted for it.

[Skuse]

My wife is a nurse and she is not getting 2.7% backdated to last April ......it’s welcomed by me

[RTP]

CF862B33-5FDF-4802-BBD1-B114982693B9.jpeg

Thanks but you still haven't answered in here

viewtopic.php?f=69&t=99338&start=15

[Woody Guthrie]

Nice spin that 91 percent of union members voted for it.

It's a bit kind to call it spin.
It's a downright lie.
48% of eligible CWU members voted in favour of the agreement.
52% either voted against it or didn't vote.

If this was an IA ballot guys like Martin would quite rightly be all over statements like that.

Now he and the rest of the union via Facebook are posting it up as factual information, draw your own conclusions.

[cobrakai]

Nice spin that 91 percent of union members voted for it.

It's a bit kind to call it spin.
It's a downright lie.
48% of eligible CWU members voted in favour of the agreement.
52% either voted against it or didn't vote.

If this was an IA ballot guys like Martin would quite rightly be all over statements like that.

Now he and the rest of the union via Facebook are posting it up as factual information, draw your own conclusions.

Would it be a legal ballot with turnout for IA

[aiden01]

Think 50% is threshold for ballot to be legal.

[hans solo]

no it wouldnt hold as required percentage not reached
going to be loads of unofficial actions coming re this agreement lets see cwu defend its members against their own recommendations
parcel duties made up with shortfall from letters ha ha
its the small parcels that impact walk times ,half the staff dont take large packets as it is its the increased volumes of small packets that impact times on delivery
just look at top shelf on frames there not going into parcel duties
shambles coming

[SpacePhoenix]

no it wouldnt hold as required percentage not reached
going to be loads of unofficial actions coming re this agreement lets see cwu defend its members against their own recommendations
parcel duties made up with shortfall from letters ha ha
its the small parcels that impact walk times ,half the staff dont take large packets as it is its the increased volumes of small packets that impact times on delivery
just look at top shelf on frames there not going into parcel duties
shambles coming

To some degree it'll depend on the template that RM ultimately decide to use for the max size of "small" before a parcel gets classed as "large"

[rambo1]

You can keep it along with your Christmas stamps, killer shoes, un-waterproof coats & cheap scabby face masks, shambles

Huh? Money is useful, with you on the rest not being though.