ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

HOW DID YOU VOTE

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.

How DID you vote (without comments)

Yes to accept the deal
22
14%
No to Reject the deal
127
83%
I have abstained or Spoiled my vote
4
3%
 
Total votes: 153

TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72618
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

HOW DID YOU VOTE

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Please only complete this poll when you have returned your ballot paper.

Non CWU members are requested not to vote as it may skew the outcome of this unscientific and unrepresentative poll.

Also members are requested not to comment on this thread on how they voted, but a discussion on how close they think the ballot is or isn't going to be, is more than welcome.


Please note there is no way that the Moderators can check how you voted.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
davidessex
Posts: 119
Joined: 19 Oct 2007, 15:10

Post by davidessex »

i have been approached by some of the more deeper thinking members ( no jokes please ) of our branch , asking particular questions on the repercussions of yes/no vote. ( those that would normally follow the advice of cwu hq.) they have gone on to reject the deal. if this is repeated over the country i would be confident of a "no" outcome. this is purely based on the people asking me, as a rep, not for my opinion, but the answers i can give as a rep. i hasten to add that i wasn,t asked by these people which way i, or they should vote, but they have informed me of their vote. this added to the positive "no,s", and i honestly have not had a single "yes" relayed to me. personally i hope this is repeated over the british isles. these people are prepared to take whatever action is necessary to secure a better deal than the one being offered at this time, including industrial action . if the leaders do not have the same courage, presuming we get a no vote, i hope they do the honorable thing and resign.
gspot01
Posts: 148
Joined: 04 Jun 2007, 08:29

honourable thing

Post by gspot01 »

Not so sure that they should be allowed an honourable exit. To my mind they have been bought off by RM and as such presented a deal which no Union Exec in their right mind should ever have looked at.

The deal on the table is almost exactly the same as before any negotiating begun, too much coffee and biscuits and dirty jokes flyin round the table and not enough hardball.

Personally I would like to see them put out of the job with a vote of NO CONFIDENCE. Maybe we should get one of the moving icons made up for all the exec members who voted yes for this deal and put them beside the ones we have for Crozier and Leighton.

:cfo :lfo then follow on with the exec.


DONT THINK I NEED TO TELL YOU THE WAY I VOTED :nana :nana :nana
Carnoustie
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 793
Joined: 31 Jan 2007, 22:00

Post by Carnoustie »

I despair at the mentality of a small minority of people in my office who said they're voting Yes just because they are tired of conflict and just want it sorted before Christmas. AT ANY PRICE ??? is my response. Most people I have spoken to in any great detail about the issues have said they have voted NO, but I am sceptical because of the experience of the Way Forward deal, that was accepted despite nobody admitting to voting for it ! I suspect the result will be close, but it's those that don't vote at all that need their heads examined. Why lose pay in the strikes and then not use your vote :roll:
mailman71
Posts: 500
Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 08:03

Post by mailman71 »

if the vote goes against us then we just have to get on with it, but as carnoustie says if people did nt vote then there is no point in moaning next year when all the sh-t of the day is brought in
postmangnu
Posts: 16
Joined: 11 Jul 2007, 12:42

Post by postmangnu »

It's gonna be a "Yes" by at least 60 - 40, probably 65-35
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Post by DGP1 »

Are we (on this board) really more radical than the majority of posties up and down the country :neutral:
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
axeman
Posts: 1733
Joined: 12 Jun 2007, 17:57

Post by axeman »

not a question about being radical it's our future thats being delt with and i must say i know of only one i'd say that voted yes in my office.
I of course voted no and no doubt am considered a union activist for doing so by the screws ?
prowler
Posts: 222
Joined: 01 Jul 2007, 10:36

Post by prowler »

postmangnu wrote:It's gonna be a "Yes" by at least 60 - 40, probably 65-35
Have you got a f*****g crystal ball or can you see into the future?
Lets all wait for the result.
I'm getting fed up of silly tw**s predicting what the result will be.
the shark
Posts: 20
Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 15:22

how did you vote

Post by the shark »

What date do the results come out ???????
Image
DA ABYSS
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Post by DGP1 »

I predict 60% yes, 65% no, 22.34% spoiled and 17.453% Victoria Beckham :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
L Tommo
Posts: 3165
Joined: 06 Feb 2007, 09:43
Gender: Male
Location: WATCHING YOU WATCHING ME!

Post by L Tommo »

Disgruntled mate i couldnt of put it better even with a Opta index...

out :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:



The hills are alive wiv the sound of bullshite!!!!
L TOMMO.... ILLEGITIMIS NON CARBORUNDUM........

EAST LONDON MAIL CENTER-ISHHHH
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72618
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

disgruntledpostie1 wrote:Are we (on this board) really more radical than the majority of posties up and down the country :neutral:
No but I think both RMC and PMC will only have people who ten to take a more active role in the workplace or who are more concerned than most. The one thing that upsets me about a lot of posties is the general apathy you see on a day to day basis. More and more being a postie is now just a job rather than providing a service, hence the reason for the relatively poor turn out on recent ballots.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
gspot01
Posts: 148
Joined: 04 Jun 2007, 08:29

GUTTED

Post by gspot01 »

Heard on the news that the deal has been accepted, totally gutted, didnt think there was a chance in hell of anyone wanting to work under these conditions.

Time to jump ship, methinks. I certainly dont want to.

Shame, I loved this job.

:cfo :lfo

:nana :nana :nana
teddycares
Posts: 17
Joined: 28 Nov 2007, 21:54

Post by teddycares »

Expected result! :no no

That’s why I didn’t vote. :evil/mad

I think the reason that most of the members voted yes was simply for the money, to stop the strike and will worry about the impact later.

This union is divided; we need people who can inspire the rank and file to unite. Lessons must be learned, questions must be asked.

The union are too busy dealing with the crap that we get from management and have took there eye off the ball.

The union has neglected the rank and file, we need good confident leadership.

The union said to all members “Maximum impact on Royal Mail with Minimum impact on membersâ€