ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

How about this???

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
L Tommo
Posts: 3165
Joined: 06 Feb 2007, 09:43
Gender: Male
Location: WATCHING YOU WATCHING ME!

Post by L Tommo »

Behave lovers...... We all know that the "IM ALRIGHT JACK" Attitude is alive in the PEC and HQ... And FFS i was joking about most of what i said.......

CHEER UP OLD SON....

Yes there are GOOD PEOPLE on the PEC and HQ but there was also a few without A SPINE OR BACKBONE.... Do you want me to name names??????

:shock:

Well fella i think that the first idea from weetrogg Is a good one when people from DO's and Local offices get up and stand for the RANK N FILE INSTEAD OF THE POLITICAL LEG UP MURCHANTS!!!


JOHNSON ANYONE???????? :oops: :oops: :oops:



OUT... NEED I SAY MORE?
L TOMMO.... ILLEGITIMIS NON CARBORUNDUM........

EAST LONDON MAIL CENTER-ISHHHH
lovejoy
Posts: 1255
Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 12:59

Post by lovejoy »

L Tommo wrote:Behave lovers...... We all know that the "IM ALRIGHT JACK" Attitude is alive in the PEC and HQ... And FFS i was joking about most of what i said.......

CHEER UP OLD SON....

Yes there are GOOD PEOPLE on the PEC and HQ but there was also a few without A SPINE OR BACKBONE.... Do you want me to name names??????

:shock:

Well fella i think that the first idea from weetrogg Is a good one when people from DO's and Local offices get up and stand for the RANK N FILE INSTEAD OF THE POLITICAL LEG UP MURCHANTS!!!


OUT... NEED I SAY MORE?
You can name them if you want mate and maybe explain why it is they are spineless / useless (or both :Very Happy )

The trouble is why we have pathetic turnouts (20,000) at national elections this always gives almost anyone a chance of getting elected!
L Tommo
Posts: 3165
Joined: 06 Feb 2007, 09:43
Gender: Male
Location: WATCHING YOU WATCHING ME!

Post by L Tommo »

Lovers.,, U hit the nail on the head mate... If We from this site got a Union rep who wants to stand in his own office then after that we could get behind him or her and make a difference... Dont you think....???

As for the PEC and HQ... Well start with the NINE!!!

With leanings to the people who actively voted and promoted the deal then down to the people who went along fro the ride....

The five i have respect for and it dont matter if i name them anyways... THEY AND WE WILL KNOW WHO THEY ARE...

I know two of them personally... I will speak face to face with them....


OUT :wave
L TOMMO.... ILLEGITIMIS NON CARBORUNDUM........

EAST LONDON MAIL CENTER-ISHHHH
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Post by BELIAL »

L Tommo wrote:Lovers.,, U hit the nail on the head mate... If We from this site got a Union rep who wants to stand in his own office then after that we could get behind him or her and make a difference... Dont you think....???

As for the PEC and HQ... Well start with the NINE!!!

With leanings to the people who actively voted and promoted the deal then down to the people who went along fro the ride....

The five i have respect for and it dont matter if i name them anyways... THEY AND WE WILL KNOW WHO THEY ARE...

I know two of them personally... I will speak face to face with them....


OUT :wave
Well for the sake of us with a short attention span and in the interest of our much vaunted democracy could someone in the know please restate who voted for and who against.
I would like to repost these facts nearer election time.
Also given the barcode traceability of each vote could someone with the information please post an office by office breakdown of the ballot result for the sake of verification, it would be an excellent and indisputable way of quashing rumours of rigging
Fluke
Posts: 506
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 17:48

Post by Fluke »

BELIAL wrote:
L Tommo wrote:Lovers.,, U hit the nail on the head mate... If We from this site got a Union rep who wants to stand in his own office then after that we could get behind him or her and make a difference... Dont you think....???

As for the PEC and HQ... Well start with the NINE!!!

With leanings to the people who actively voted and promoted the deal then down to the people who went along fro the ride....

The five i have respect for and it dont matter if i name them anyways... THEY AND WE WILL KNOW WHO THEY ARE...

I know two of them personally... I will speak face to face with them....


OUT :wave
Well for the sake of us with a short attention span and in the interest of our much vaunted democracy could someone in the know please restate who voted for and who against.
I would like to repost these facts nearer election time.
Also given the barcode traceability of each vote could someone with the information please post an office by office breakdown of the ballot result for the sake of verification, it would be an excellent and indisputable way of quashing rumours of rigging
I'l second that request. Lets have a breakdown of the offices or branches. I'm sure someone on here said these figures were going to be available.
lovejoy
Posts: 1255
Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 12:59

Post by lovejoy »

Fluke wrote:
BELIAL wrote:
L Tommo wrote:Lovers.,, U hit the nail on the head mate... If We from this site got a Union rep who wants to stand in his own office then after that we could get behind him or her and make a difference... Dont you think....???

As for the PEC and HQ... Well start with the NINE!!!

With leanings to the people who actively voted and promoted the deal then down to the people who went along fro the ride....

The five i have respect for and it dont matter if i name them anyways... THEY AND WE WILL KNOW WHO THEY ARE...

I know two of them personally... I will speak face to face with them....


OUT :wave
Well for the sake of us with a short attention span and in the interest of our much vaunted democracy could someone in the know please restate who voted for and who against.
I would like to repost these facts nearer election time.
Also given the barcode traceability of each vote could someone with the information please post an office by office breakdown of the ballot result for the sake of verification, it would be an excellent and indisputable way of quashing rumours of rigging
I'l second that request. Lets have a breakdown of the offices or branches. I'm sure someone on here said these figures were going to be available.
Personally I would vote for some people who have voted yes and come who have voted no based on what i know about them and there sevices to the union as a whole.

I have seen a copy of the breakdown of voting but what purpose would it serve other than to blame each other for the final result??

Time to draw the line and move on surely?
weetrogg
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 239
Joined: 07 Oct 2007, 13:36

Post by weetrogg »

how did you get this information?? i know the deals been done but im sure most people in here would like a breakdown of the ballot, so post away lovejoy :Applause :Applause :Applause




WE are the union :nana :nana :nana
Tman
Posts: 4141
Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 09:57

Post by Tman »

Time to draw the line and move on surely
You'd think so, but some want a scapegoat, it seems.
IF the vote breakdown by branch were available, then there'd be the "so who voted "yes" in those particular branches?" threads and questions, and as that info isn't available, the conclusion drawn would be the standard "see I told you it was rigged" conclusion by the brain-dead.
The only real conclusion to be drawn is that 64% of those who voted were satisfied enough to vote yes, but only 64% of the total eligable to vote felt strongly enough either way to bother.
And to think how we all laughed at the Florida election fiasco of a few years ago.............. :left:
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Post by BELIAL »

lovejoy wrote:
Fluke wrote:
BELIAL wrote:
L Tommo wrote:Lovers.,, U hit the nail on the head mate... If We from this site got a Union rep who wants to stand in his own office then after that we could get behind him or her and make a difference... Dont you think....???

As for the PEC and HQ... Well start with the NINE!!!

With leanings to the people who actively voted and promoted the deal then down to the people who went along fro the ride....

The five i have respect for and it dont matter if i name them anyways... THEY AND WE WILL KNOW WHO THEY ARE...

I know two of them personally... I will speak face to face with them....


OUT :wave
Well for the sake of us with a short attention span and in the interest of our much vaunted democracy could someone in the know please restate who voted for and who against.
I would like to repost these facts nearer election time.
Also given the barcode traceability of each vote could someone with the information please post an office by office breakdown of the ballot result for the sake of verification, it would be an excellent and indisputable way of quashing rumours of rigging
I'l second that request. Lets have a breakdown of the offices or branches. I'm sure someone on here said these figures were going to be available.
Personally I would vote for some people who have voted yes and come who have voted no based on what i know about them and there sevices to the union as a whole.

I have seen a copy of the breakdown of voting but what purpose would it serve other than to blame each other for the final result??

Time to draw the line and move on surely?

Totally agree about moving on Lovejoy, no use weeping and wailing But the question surely is in which direction do we move?
How at election time ,is the membership going to be able to make an INFORMED choice if vital information is witheld. You have stated your voting intentions and your reasons for this but you do have the luxury of access to what appears to be priviliged information, is the ordinary membership somehow unworthy of this right?
As far as branch and office voting breakdown goes, blame does,nt enter the equation, there are two important issues though,
1 It would be relatively simple to check the official results with anonymous confirmation;
2It would highlight the areas where the union needs to do more work, recruitment, information, campaigns etc.If all members were aware of our relative strengths and weaknesses it would only help to build the union, especially given our leaderships belief that the true strength of the union lies in its local organisation.

In short yes lets move on ,but not blindly stumbling in the dark,but with an informed course and wiser for the lessons learned
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72700
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

No matter which side of the Yes/No argument you were on we are now all having to deal with the situation we find ourselves in. However, I am mad at 1 particular group of people - those that received their papers but did not send them back. As a result we now have an agreement that has not got the backing of the majority of CWU members and because of that there will always be questions about the credibility of the deal.

However, I think a line needs to be drawn soon. People are complaining about the result, and despite posts to the contrary people are allowed to complain about the deal if they did not agree with it. But at some point we have to stop complaining and live with what has landed in our laps. I hope that the day is not too long in coming as we have to move on and getting stuck in the past is not good for anyone, least of all hard working Postal staff and CWU members.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: PIE EATER WANTED...

Post by dvbuk55 »

lovejoy wrote: At the end of the day the agreement is the agreement and we now have to do our best working with it. It is very easy to sit back slagging people off saying 'nothing to do with me' - It is a little harder to step forward and take up the challenge!
Looks like the agreement is NOT the agreement with the attitude RM are taking over Saturdays, for that I don't blame the PEC or the Exec BUT how was the change going to be administered and did either of them question it. Remember the conference call?- the deal was sweetened with that offer - well we have been duped yet again, the Exec, the PEC and of course the membership.
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Post by Big Daz »

It does seem that no pre planning has gone into the saturday issue.

Based on walksorted mail being available,then in my office a 0530 start is 100% viable on a saturday

In my delivery office then prep the walksort then do IPS and then prep again and then finsish off the IPS on the last van will make a earlier start on a saturday possible.
L Tommo
Posts: 3165
Joined: 06 Feb 2007, 09:43
Gender: Male
Location: WATCHING YOU WATCHING ME!

Post by L Tommo »

It took 27 years for Nelson Mandella to get his justice of sorts....

So because the deal is done. Should we all just sit back and not find out the facts that SHOULD be availible for all.... So LJ you have info that gives you the breakdown of the vote....? WHY MENTION IT ON HERE UNLESS YOU ARE WILLING TO POST IT?>?>>?

I hope its not just a schoolboy prank and a one upmanship that you boast....???

If so then your a dirty tease.... You rotter!!!

I also want to move on but as BELIAL Said... But how shall we when people on the PEC /HQ voted for something when there was a blackout of newS agreed for the weeks leading up to the deal and then WHOLLOP "THIS IS THE DEAL AND ITS A GREAT CHANGE FROM BEFORE."

Personally i dont agree.. (No surprise there) But now we should demand the vote and voters on the PEC to step forward... As if you 9 agreed to it....?

STAND UP AND BE COUNTED. As you speak for us... So tell us what you said and how you felt it will benefit US REAL WORKERS????


OUT :hmmmm
L TOMMO.... ILLEGITIMIS NON CARBORUNDUM........

EAST LONDON MAIL CENTER-ISHHHH
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Post by dvbuk55 »

I don't know that it would do any good saying who on the PEC voted for or against - the final vote was down to the membership, the EC and some of the PEC recommended it and for that they should shoulder some of the blame, there is no excuse for the blatant campaign, using Union funds, for a YES vote. THAT is unforgivable.

We have seen ,in less than a month , that a leopard doesn't change it's spots, RM isn't going to honour any part of the agreement it doesn't want to. Whereas the CWU are hoping local agreement is going to be of value, RM have a corporate plan and it doesn't involve negotiation.
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Post by BELIAL »

L Tommo wrote:It took 27 years for Nelson Mandella to get his justice of sorts....

So because the deal is done. Should we all just sit back and not find out the facts that SHOULD be availible for all.... So LJ you have info that gives you the breakdown of the vote....? WHY MENTION IT ON HERE UNLESS YOU ARE WILLING TO POST IT?>?>>?

I hope its not just a schoolboy prank and a one upmanship that you boast....???

If so then your a dirty tease.... You rotter!!!

I also want to move on but as BELIAL Said... But how shall we when people on the PEC /HQ voted for something when there was a blackout of newS agreed for the weeks leading up to the deal and then WHOLLOP "THIS IS THE DEAL AND ITS A GREAT CHANGE FROM BEFORE."

Personally i dont agree.. (No surprise there) But now we should demand the vote and voters on the PEC to step forward... As if you 9 agreed to it....?

STAND UP AND BE COUNTED. As you speak for us... So tell us what you said and how you felt it will benefit US REAL WORKERS????


OUT :hmmmm
Yup Its called having the courage of your convictions.

Fine lets all assume that those who approved this deal acted in good faith and with the best intentions, forget conspiracy, pay offs ,electioneering .no mud slinging, you may be proved right or not,but you have passed judgement and should have the courage to stand by it,tell us who you are.
Personally I would be delighted if my fears were proved groundless, ordinary posties would be better off, I'd eat umble pie for ever and not mind a bit.
But If you are proved wrong don't try to duck responsibility behind the mask of anonymity , you will have made a mistake ,no shame in that, we all do from time to time ,but have the strength of character to admit your error and accept the judgement of a fully informed membership