lovejoy wrote:Fluke wrote:BELIAL wrote:L Tommo wrote:Lovers.,, U hit the nail on the head mate... If We from this site got a Union rep who wants to stand in his own office then after that we could get behind him or her and make a difference... Dont you think....???
As for the PEC and HQ... Well start with the NINE!!!
With leanings to the people who actively voted and promoted the deal then down to the people who went along fro the ride....
The five i have respect for and it dont matter if i name them anyways... THEY AND WE WILL KNOW WHO THEY ARE...
I know two of them personally... I will speak face to face with them....
OUT

Well for the sake of us with a short attention span and in the interest of our much vaunted democracy could someone in the know please restate who voted for and who against.
I would like to repost these facts nearer election time.
Also given the barcode traceability of each vote could someone with the information please post an office by office breakdown of the ballot result for the sake of verification, it would be an excellent and indisputable way of quashing rumours of rigging
I'l second that request. Lets have a breakdown of the offices or branches. I'm sure someone on here said these figures were going to be available.
Personally I would vote for some people who have voted yes and come who have voted no based on what i know about them and there sevices to the union as a whole.
I have seen a copy of the breakdown of voting but what purpose would it serve other than to blame each other for the final result??
Time to draw the line and move on surely?
Totally agree about moving on Lovejoy, no use weeping and wailing But the question surely is in which direction do we move?
How at election time ,is the membership going to be able to make an INFORMED choice if vital information is witheld. You have stated your voting intentions and your reasons for this but you do have the luxury of access to what appears to be priviliged information, is the ordinary membership somehow unworthy of this right?
As far as branch and office voting breakdown goes, blame does,nt enter the equation, there are two important issues though,
1 It would be relatively simple to check the official results with anonymous confirmation;
2It would highlight the areas where the union needs to do more work, recruitment, information, campaigns etc.If all members were aware of our relative strengths and weaknesses it would only help to build the union, especially given our leaderships belief that the true strength of the union lies in its local organisation.
In short yes lets move on ,but not blindly stumbling in the dark,but with an informed course and wiser for the lessons learned