ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

BALLOT RESULT

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: pensions war

Post by dvbuk55 »

mince pie wrote:Now that the result is known. Lets unite and accepts the 5.4 and prepare for the pensions war!
Yeah right!
IWW Fellow Worker
Posts: 3644
Joined: 30 May 2007, 14:27
Gender: Male

Re: pensions war

Post by IWW Fellow Worker »

mince pie wrote:Now that the result is known. Lets unite and accepts the 5.4 and prepare for the pensions war!
It's not so much the 5.4%, but the idea of flexibility. So, all due respect, but I'm not uniting with scum who would work us into an early grave.
The Industrial Workers of the World. The union whose members never scab!

"The working class and the employing class have nothing in common."
ohmattyboy
Posts: 7
Joined: 21 Jun 2007, 17:24

Post by ohmattyboy »

Dave Ward and the other top union bosses should be voted out! Shocking deal, Now lets get rid of them and put someone in with some bottle! f***ing sellouts, should be ashamed and should fuckoff with leighton and crozier!
stephen500
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1458
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 04:04

46000 members couldn't be bothered to vote!

Post by stephen500 »

How bad is that..46000 not voting!
What does that tell the union about its relationship with the members.
k979aaa
Posts: 12578
Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
Gender: Male
Location: THE NORTH

WAS THE BALLOT RIGGED?.

Post by k979aaa »

For the turnout was about the same as last time but is it not the case that after strike's have begun and a reballot on new term's that the turnout is often higher than last time. :shock: :evil/mad
dazza21
Posts: 19
Joined: 11 Jul 2007, 17:22

Post by dazza21 »

here here matty boy you sound like a decent chap do you want a job on the union top table old boy
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Re: pensions war

Post by BELIAL »

mince pie wrote:Now that the result is known. Lets unite and accepts the 5.4 and prepare for the pensions war!
Will it be like our last war? Same generals, same spin, might be a bit futile since we've already agreed to disarm.
mucker
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 605
Joined: 25 Oct 2007, 14:12
Gender: Female
Location: cloud cookoo land

Post by mucker »

IWW Fellow Worker wrote:
amma fairman wrote:Who were the pr**s who voted yes, and on what grounds?
'pr**s' is far too polite a word for the vermin who sold out to the bosses, but I think what swung it was the idea of the bonus and backpay before the Yuletide Feast, and the fear of going on strike before it. Had the ballot been held mid-October, I think we could have seen a different outcome.
yep you are correct,however it just goes to show how shallow some people are,they cant see any further than the end of there own nose.thick twats :lfo :lfo :lfo
simply_the_best
Posts: 594
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 10:29

Post by simply_the_best »

what does it tell you about some of the members?
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Post by BELIAL »

Lets not forget who reccommended this deal
stephen500
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1458
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 04:04

So who voted yes and why?

Post by stephen500 »

So who voted yes?

Surely not the delivery postman....just watch RM make you do households for nothing. £1000 loss a year?
Then there is the extra work to cover s/l and a/l all for nothing..how much will they lose there.

Surely not the mail centres...just watch the overtime disappear with flexibility.

Opps surely they didn't believe the union and Rm re pensions?

I bet i can't find anyone who voted yes in a years time...

Welcome to 'way forward two'.
mucker
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 605
Joined: 25 Oct 2007, 14:12
Gender: Female
Location: cloud cookoo land

Post by mucker »

BELIAL wrote:Lets not forget who reccommended this deal
yep laurel and hardy,pair of !@#$%^&* :arrrghhh :arrrghhh
the beautiful bd south
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 336
Joined: 06 Jun 2007, 20:48
Location: west riding of yorkshire

Post by the beautiful bd south »

Have to say yet again the turnout was pathetic for such an important issue...

But nothing new there.
TOO OLD TO DIE YOUNG
deadbox
Posts: 357
Joined: 27 May 2007, 11:51

I'm off......

Post by deadbox »

Well thats it, I'm going to look into going self employed in the next 6-12 months

SOME PEOPLE ARE SLEEPWALKING INTO RM HANDS

when I point out the MANY negative points of the agreement they think that RM won't use flexability here, I havn't got enough time on my delivery to take an extra bag in the summer--------THATS NOT HOW THE DOM WILL SEE IT !

The management will make FULL USE of the agreement to further their own ends !

Just try cutting off now ---- 30 mins FLEXABILITY

Still undecided whether to quit the CWU ..... £3 a weeks better in my pocket, and not paying for WARD / HAYNEs minibar tab

VERY DISSAPOINTED !

:sad:
postie28
Posts: 372
Joined: 05 Jun 2007, 17:48
Location: in front of me computer supping a can of lager. but shortly going out to the picket line

Re: So who voted yes and why?

Post by postie28 »

stephen500 wrote:So who voted yes?

Surely not the delivery postman....just watch RM make you do households for nothing. £1000 loss a year?
Then there is the extra work to cover s/l and a/l all for nothing..how much will they lose there.

Surely not the mail centres...just watch the overtime disappear with flexibility.

Opps surely they didn't believe the union and Rm re pensions?

I bet i can't find anyone who voted yes in a years time...

Welcome to 'way forward two'.








you'll have a job to find someone who voted yes tomorrow let alone in a years time. must be all those ghost posties again . the same ones who voted the way forward in.
:mad :sad:
watch out. there may be a dom about