Yeah right!mince pie wrote:Now that the result is known. Lets unite and accepts the 5.4 and prepare for the pensions war!
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
BALLOT RESULT
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: pensions war
-
IWW Fellow Worker
- Posts: 3644
- Joined: 30 May 2007, 14:27
- Gender: Male
Re: pensions war
It's not so much the 5.4%, but the idea of flexibility. So, all due respect, but I'm not uniting with scum who would work us into an early grave.mince pie wrote:Now that the result is known. Lets unite and accepts the 5.4 and prepare for the pensions war!
The Industrial Workers of the World. The union whose members never scab!
"The working class and the employing class have nothing in common."
"The working class and the employing class have nothing in common."
-
ohmattyboy
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 21 Jun 2007, 17:24
-
stephen500
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 1458
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 04:04
46000 members couldn't be bothered to vote!
How bad is that..46000 not voting!
What does that tell the union about its relationship with the members.
What does that tell the union about its relationship with the members.
-
k979aaa
- Posts: 12578
- Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
- Gender: Male
- Location: THE NORTH
WAS THE BALLOT RIGGED?.
For the turnout was about the same as last time but is it not the case that after strike's have begun and a reballot on new term's that the turnout is often higher than last time.

-
dazza21
- Posts: 19
- Joined: 11 Jul 2007, 17:22
-
BELIAL
- Posts: 6758
- Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
- Gender: Female
- Location: Nowhere
Re: pensions war
Will it be like our last war? Same generals, same spin, might be a bit futile since we've already agreed to disarm.mince pie wrote:Now that the result is known. Lets unite and accepts the 5.4 and prepare for the pensions war!
-
mucker
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 605
- Joined: 25 Oct 2007, 14:12
- Gender: Female
- Location: cloud cookoo land
yep you are correct,however it just goes to show how shallow some people are,they cant see any further than the end of there own nose.thick twats :lfo :lfo :lfoIWW Fellow Worker wrote:'pr**s' is far too polite a word for the vermin who sold out to the bosses, but I think what swung it was the idea of the bonus and backpay before the Yuletide Feast, and the fear of going on strike before it. Had the ballot been held mid-October, I think we could have seen a different outcome.amma fairman wrote:Who were the pr**s who voted yes, and on what grounds?
-
simply_the_best
- Posts: 594
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 10:29
-
BELIAL
- Posts: 6758
- Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
- Gender: Female
- Location: Nowhere
-
stephen500
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 1458
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 04:04
So who voted yes and why?
So who voted yes?
Surely not the delivery postman....just watch RM make you do households for nothing. £1000 loss a year?
Then there is the extra work to cover s/l and a/l all for nothing..how much will they lose there.
Surely not the mail centres...just watch the overtime disappear with flexibility.
Opps surely they didn't believe the union and Rm re pensions?
I bet i can't find anyone who voted yes in a years time...
Welcome to 'way forward two'.
Surely not the delivery postman....just watch RM make you do households for nothing. £1000 loss a year?
Then there is the extra work to cover s/l and a/l all for nothing..how much will they lose there.
Surely not the mail centres...just watch the overtime disappear with flexibility.
Opps surely they didn't believe the union and Rm re pensions?
I bet i can't find anyone who voted yes in a years time...
Welcome to 'way forward two'.
-
mucker
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 605
- Joined: 25 Oct 2007, 14:12
- Gender: Female
- Location: cloud cookoo land
-
the beautiful bd south
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 336
- Joined: 06 Jun 2007, 20:48
- Location: west riding of yorkshire
-
deadbox
- Posts: 357
- Joined: 27 May 2007, 11:51
I'm off......
Well thats it, I'm going to look into going self employed in the next 6-12 months
SOME PEOPLE ARE SLEEPWALKING INTO RM HANDS
when I point out the MANY negative points of the agreement they think that RM won't use flexability here, I havn't got enough time on my delivery to take an extra bag in the summer--------THATS NOT HOW THE DOM WILL SEE IT !
The management will make FULL USE of the agreement to further their own ends !
Just try cutting off now ---- 30 mins FLEXABILITY
Still undecided whether to quit the CWU ..... £3 a weeks better in my pocket, and not paying for WARD / HAYNEs minibar tab
VERY DISSAPOINTED !

SOME PEOPLE ARE SLEEPWALKING INTO RM HANDS
when I point out the MANY negative points of the agreement they think that RM won't use flexability here, I havn't got enough time on my delivery to take an extra bag in the summer--------THATS NOT HOW THE DOM WILL SEE IT !
The management will make FULL USE of the agreement to further their own ends !
Just try cutting off now ---- 30 mins FLEXABILITY
Still undecided whether to quit the CWU ..... £3 a weeks better in my pocket, and not paying for WARD / HAYNEs minibar tab
VERY DISSAPOINTED !
-
postie28
- Posts: 372
- Joined: 05 Jun 2007, 17:48
- Location: in front of me computer supping a can of lager. but shortly going out to the picket line
Re: So who voted yes and why?
stephen500 wrote:So who voted yes?
Surely not the delivery postman....just watch RM make you do households for nothing. £1000 loss a year?
Then there is the extra work to cover s/l and a/l all for nothing..how much will they lose there.
Surely not the mail centres...just watch the overtime disappear with flexibility.
Opps surely they didn't believe the union and Rm re pensions?
I bet i can't find anyone who voted yes in a years time...
Welcome to 'way forward two'.
you'll have a job to find someone who voted yes tomorrow let alone in a years time. must be all those ghost posties again . the same ones who voted the way forward in.
watch out. there may be a dom about