ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

FINAL AGREEMENT:THE POLL

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.

WHAT WAY WILL YOU BE VOTING:THE FINAL AGREEMENT.

YES:FOR THE DEAL.
150
19%
NO:REJECT THE DEAL.
621
81%
 
Total votes: 771

Biggins
Posts: 38
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 21:12

Post by Biggins »

postmangnu wrote:I dont think the deal is so bad and will vote yes. Its being recommended by most of the top people in the union after all. Certainly I cant afford to lose any more money when there isnt much chance of a better deal even after more strikes
How does everyone know there isn't much chance of a better deal. Did this pay deal start with a one off lump sum payment and no percentage added our pay? How can anyone know that we can't get better when royal mail have persistently lied to us?
Remember, the way you do you job will affect colleagues for years to come - if you cut corners to do it quick, they will be expected to as well....and then RM will add extra work to fill the gaps.
DirtyHarry
Posts: 5051
Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
Gender: Male
Location: London

Post by DirtyHarry »

postmangnu wrote:I dont think the deal is so bad and will vote yes. Its being recommended by most of the top people in the union after all. Certainly I cant afford to lose any more money when there isnt much chance of a better deal even after more strikes
I hope when we battle to save our pensions, and I'm sure we'll have to, you'll show a little more bottle than that. :shock:

Imagine the scenario for a moment, when we strike over our pensions we'll stand to lose hundreds of pounds in lost earnings, but so as we don't lose
tens of thousands of pounds when we need it most, in retirement.

The "I can't afford to strike" whine, will come back at you with a resounding whack on that one, mate. :Very Happy
jmlr1971
Posts: 87
Joined: 18 Jun 2007, 21:31
Location: scotland

Post by jmlr1971 »

postmangnu wrote:I dont think the deal is so bad and will vote yes. Its being recommended by most of the top people in the union after all. Certainly I cant afford to lose any more money when there isnt much chance of a better deal even after more strikes

YA T1T
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Post by BELIAL »

postmangnu wrote:I dont think the deal is so bad and will vote yes. Its being recommended by most of the top people in the union after all. Certainly I cant afford to lose any more money when there isnt much chance of a better deal even after more strikes
Oh I can't be bothered explaining again , your a nark or terminally stupid either way no point talking
mydomsadum
Posts: 4
Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 20:44

Post by mydomsadum »

:arrrghhh NO :no no NO :so there NO
rebel
Posts: 67
Joined: 10 Oct 2007, 19:42

Post by rebel »

What the hell did we strike for and lose virtually 2 weeks wages. What planet are the nec on to recommend this deal? We've virtually lost on every score!

Yeah I know it's effectivily gotta be ratified by members - but the shires will go along with it. Then you'll hear the bleats about "Christmas is coming..."" - That's when we are strong for God's sake!!

The NEC have shafted us if they recommend us to accept this.
slave 10000
Posts: 3
Joined: 14 Oct 2007, 23:32

Post by slave 10000 »

I can see this going through **** as it is
Daniel Dunglas Home
Posts: 57
Joined: 09 Oct 2007, 19:31

Post by Daniel Dunglas Home »

Im running a book 4/6 yes, 5/4 no.
South East Postie
Posts: 154
Joined: 14 May 2007, 13:25
Gender: Male

Post by South East Postie »

its gutting that it will be a no vote, im fairly sure of that, but it will be rigged and magically a yes vote will appear.
hoofer
Posts: 144
Joined: 19 May 2007, 10:20
Location: YES PLEASE CARIBBEAN!!!

Post by hoofer »

South East Postie wrote:its gutting that it will be a no vote, im fairly sure of that, but it will be rigged and magically a yes vote will appear.
:hmmmm :hmmmm Someone else who's still picking the splinter's
out of his arse from being sharfted by another vote we once had when every man
and his dog wanted a NO! VOTE but as if by magic


:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: YES :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
Mmmm Horse Sh*t :hmmmm :hmmmm Dog Sh*t

:Sick :Sick :Sick NO IT'S BULLSH*T :Sick :Sick :Sick
swerve
Posts: 6
Joined: 20 May 2007, 16:48
Location: east sussex

Post by swerve »

Whatever way it goes, do your job properly! See what happens then! :shock:
mylegshurt
Posts: 194
Joined: 18 Jul 2007, 13:06

Post by mylegshurt »

ffs listen to swerve.
HootyMacBoob
Posts: 265
Joined: 31 Jul 2007, 20:37
Gender: Male

Post by HootyMacBoob »

Well at last i can make my vote after reading the facts and not going on rumors.
IWW Fellow Worker
Posts: 3644
Joined: 30 May 2007, 14:27
Gender: Male

Post by IWW Fellow Worker »

South East Postie wrote:its gutting that it will be a no vote, im fairly sure of that, but it will be rigged and magically a yes vote will appear.
A bit like that time in 1981 when we had a vote on not working on Saturdays or continuing to work on Saturdays, but with a substantial pay rise. Everyone I ever met for years after voted to have Saturdays off, but the vote was in favour of keeping them. The 'substantial pay rise' never materialised, but I suppose everyone realises that.
The Industrial Workers of the World. The union whose members never scab!

"The working class and the employing class have nothing in common."
rebel
Posts: 67
Joined: 10 Oct 2007, 19:42

Post by rebel »

As Swerve says -do the job properly!!! Shaft them before they shaft us.For years they've relied on goodwill and our determination to get the job done but also to make time. This morning in our office we had extra sorters on overnight but still nobody cleared-in until 6am. You could see the shock and panic in their faces. Therefore they couldn't really put out any more work as they knew it would all be coming back. 9 walks didn't go out as it was. Just get used to finishing 2pm (or whatever your time is) - don't give them a minute.