fishtank wrote:It's right that we should confront Jihadists
Ok.
What's your plan?
Every attempt by western governments to confront Jihadist extremism head on has failed and not just failed but proper f****d up failed by making the situation worse and increasing the danger of terrorist attacks not only in western countries but more frequently in the countries where we have intervened.
I can hear a lot of blowhard, let's kick some ass, get tough shite but I'm not seeing even the tiniest glimpse of an idea that isn't same s**t-different day. Remind me what Einstein didn't say about the definition of insanity...
Exerting some pressure on Sauid Arabia and the other Gulf states that tacitly support Isis would be a start, rather than the approach the current and previous governments have had with these countries. That would inevitably have an effect on our economy though.
I disagree to some extent Fishtank, from what i have read Isis is a much more tangible organisation than Al Qaeda was/ is, some of the beliefs and motivations of the hardcore are as much feudal as they are religious, (many of the remnants of the Iraqi Imperial Guard shifted allegiance to Isis). But certainly as much as the foreign fighters and the ideology are concerned of course you are right. The uncomfortable truth is Isis and the other disparate groups fighting Assad served a purpose when it looked he could be overthrown, securing the region to the benefit of the Saudis, Gulf States and the West.
I suppose it's the nature of foreign policy that you have to maintain relations with some horrible f***ers, but all this emphasis on Corbyn and the IRA, when we have the kind of relations with these countries, and bearing in mind who they support, strikes me as perversely hypocritcal, but then you want see that on the front page of The Sun will you........
I