Does anybody know which 20 offices were chosen?POSTMAN wrote:https://www.myroyalmail.com/news/nation ... g-together
As part of our Agenda for Growth, we will continue to work with the CWU to bring in the different phases of the new agreement over the coming months. To date:
•Royal Mail and the CWU have been working together to clear all outstanding industrial disputes.
•Joint briefings are now taking place promoting fairness, dignity and respect in the workplace.
•We are jointly visiting 20 delivery offices to identify how resource is being aligned to workload as part of the delivery review. Ten offices were chosen by Royal Mail and 10 by the CWU.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
National Delivery Review
-
Cichlid
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 116
- Joined: 12 Mar 2013, 18:45
- Gender: Male
Re: National Delivery Review
-
BernardBresslaw
- Posts: 381
- Joined: 24 Nov 2011, 15:52
- Gender: Male
Re: National Delivery Review
We had Bob Gibson and RM management at ours yesterday. I guess it was related? I'm only guessing as I wasn't there. In the PE area. A sign of the times that the two are working hand-in-hand now though. Very chummy.Cichlid wrote:Does anybody know which 20 offices were chosen?POSTMAN wrote:https://www.myroyalmail.com/news/nation ... g-together
As part of our Agenda for Growth, we will continue to work with the CWU to bring in the different phases of the new agreement over the coming months. To date:
•Royal Mail and the CWU have been working together to clear all outstanding industrial disputes.
•Joint briefings are now taking place promoting fairness, dignity and respect in the workplace.
•We are jointly visiting 20 delivery offices to identify how resource is being aligned to workload as part of the delivery review. Ten offices were chosen by Royal Mail and 10 by the CWU.
-
mandelsons_toenail
- Posts: 1294
- Joined: 08 Aug 2009, 18:16
- Gender: Male
- Location: Outer Hebrides
Re: National Delivery Review
I was privy to a visit from the cwu top brass and rm big wigs
It was weird, they wanted people to be brutally honest, and they were
It was weird, they wanted people to be brutally honest, and they were
-
The_Wax_Man
- Posts: 191
- Joined: 11 Nov 2011, 14:18
- Gender: Male
Re: National Delivery Review
mandelsons_toenail wrote:I was privy to a visit from the cwu top brass and rm big wigs
It was weird, they wanted people to be brutally honest, and they were
Good - I hope what was said and discussed was and has been taken on board by them and not a 'version' of it.
time will tell
-
Lincox
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 3485
- Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 18:07
- Gender: Male
Re: National Delivery Review
This would have been an isolated incident and not indicative of the rest of the sites that they visited.

-
daveyeff
- Posts: 4699
- Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
- Gender: Male
Re: National Delivery Review
its going to be like working for the ''LE QUINT-DICKEY'' mining company.fishtank wrote:It's straight from the blessed agreement itself DV, The Ten Commandments of a "can do culture" as laid down by Moya and to a lesser extent Dave.dvbuk55 wrote:Did the union publish this or Royal Mail, because for the life of me all I see is Royal Mail propaganda.
By the way "can do culture" has got to be the new "Deal Of The Century".....
-
Hitcher
- Posts: 1528
- Joined: 20 Sep 2009, 09:59
- Gender: Male
Re: National Delivery Review
Told today that we'll be lapsing another 2 duties from next week, this is apparently due to every office in the country having to lapse an extra 10%.
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: National Delivery Review
Heard today that a few "rogue" managers are trying to implement the, as yet unannounced, "incentive scheme" - which involves, allegedly, no payment for overtime which will go into a savings pot -
sounds remarkably similar to a previous scheme - hasn't been suggested here yet but it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest.
-
aiden01
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 7001
- Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
- Gender: Male
Re: National Delivery Review
There wil be no savings pot then who in there right mind would do ot for everyone else to benefit.dvbuk55 wrote:Heard today that a few "rogue" managers are trying to implement the, as yet unannounced, "incentive scheme" - which involves, allegedly, no payment for overtime which will go into a savings pot -sounds remarkably similar to a previous scheme - hasn't been suggested here yet but it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest.
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: National Delivery Review
Well we'll have to see what the maestros of negotiations have come up with, but I see a fair bit of flexibility, workload to manpower, lapsing. One scenario that may fly is when a duty is lapsed where OT might have been an option the duty is covered via flexibility and any "saved" hours are then put into the pot. These are the possibilities when the small print hasn't been written before the ballot.aiden01 wrote:There wil be no savings pot then who in there right mind would do ot for everyone else to benefit.dvbuk55 wrote:Heard today that a few "rogue" managers are trying to implement the, as yet unannounced, "incentive scheme" - which involves, allegedly, no payment for overtime which will go into a savings pot -sounds remarkably similar to a previous scheme - hasn't been suggested here yet but it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest.
-
BernardBresslaw
- Posts: 381
- Joined: 24 Nov 2011, 15:52
- Gender: Male
Re: National Delivery Review
This last week, our office has been absorbing rounds despite being above model week, in terms of traffic, and our reps are doing nothing about it. A worrying sign of things to come.
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: National Delivery Review
We haven't started official lapsing yet but odds and sods here and there is a fairly regular occurrence. Then again we are quite a number of staff short.BernardBresslaw wrote:This last week, our office has been absorbing rounds despite being above model week, in terms of traffic, and our reps are doing nothing about it. A worrying sign of things to come.
-
BernardBresslaw
- Posts: 381
- Joined: 24 Nov 2011, 15:52
- Gender: Male
Re: National Delivery Review
I take mine if I have time, but the point is, a week after signing a new agreement, a core aspect of it is already being ignored by managers and union both. It doesn't reassure you that any delivery revision in the future, will fare any better.
-
chrisj
- Posts: 1883
- Joined: 21 Dec 2010, 16:24
- Gender: Male
Re: National Delivery Review
From the CWU Voice Newsletter we now know of two of the offices taking part in the Review - it has started already!
Motherwell - Scotland:
99 employees
FT/PT of 52/47.
FT start time of 7am to 3 pm and PT starts at 9.45am
* For operational reasons Ft staff finishes 1 hour later than Pt (why and how?)
** CWU Unit Rep says 'sometimes they call the PT staff in early, for 8.30am and he also said that no-one comes in early to start and everyone takes their meal relief (break)
South Lambeth - London:
medium sized office
44 employees
FT/PT 36/8
FT starts at 6.00am and finish at 2pm
There are other Areas mentioned but not specific offices...
Motherwell - Scotland:
99 employees
FT/PT of 52/47.
FT start time of 7am to 3 pm and PT starts at 9.45am
* For operational reasons Ft staff finishes 1 hour later than Pt (why and how?)
** CWU Unit Rep says 'sometimes they call the PT staff in early, for 8.30am and he also said that no-one comes in early to start and everyone takes their meal relief (break)
South Lambeth - London:
medium sized office
44 employees
FT/PT 36/8
FT starts at 6.00am and finish at 2pm
There are other Areas mentioned but not specific offices...
Last edited by chrisj on 09 Feb 2014, 17:06, edited 3 times in total.
-
daveyeff
- Posts: 4699
- Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
- Gender: Male
Re: National Delivery Review
we are absorbing most weeks. but when they are told ''we havent got time'' they say well ''manage your packets'',,,i.e. stand down your packets so you can get your lapsing done.....lapsing is supposed to be done if we havent got enough work to take us to our time. so willfully delaying packets to do more letters is an absurd contradiction of the very purpose of lapsing. gaffer says it easier to get loops of mail covered than packets....they are done at a later date. its a madhouse,,,,A MADHOUSE.BernardBresslaw wrote:This last week, our office has been absorbing rounds despite being above model week, in terms of traffic, and our reps are doing nothing about it. A worrying sign of things to come.