ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

National Delivery Review

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
Cichlid
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 116
Joined: 12 Mar 2013, 18:45
Gender: Male

Re: National Delivery Review

Post by Cichlid »

POSTMAN wrote:https://www.myroyalmail.com/news/nation ... g-together


As part of our Agenda for Growth, we will continue to work with the CWU to bring in the different phases of the new agreement over the coming months. To date:

•Royal Mail and the CWU have been working together to clear all outstanding industrial disputes.
•Joint briefings are now taking place promoting fairness, dignity and respect in the workplace.
•We are jointly visiting 20 delivery offices to identify how resource is being aligned to workload as part of the delivery review. Ten offices were chosen by Royal Mail and 10 by the CWU.
Does anybody know which 20 offices were chosen?
BernardBresslaw
Posts: 381
Joined: 24 Nov 2011, 15:52
Gender: Male

Re: National Delivery Review

Post by BernardBresslaw »

Cichlid wrote:
POSTMAN wrote:https://www.myroyalmail.com/news/nation ... g-together


As part of our Agenda for Growth, we will continue to work with the CWU to bring in the different phases of the new agreement over the coming months. To date:

•Royal Mail and the CWU have been working together to clear all outstanding industrial disputes.
•Joint briefings are now taking place promoting fairness, dignity and respect in the workplace.
•We are jointly visiting 20 delivery offices to identify how resource is being aligned to workload as part of the delivery review. Ten offices were chosen by Royal Mail and 10 by the CWU.
Does anybody know which 20 offices were chosen?
We had Bob Gibson and RM management at ours yesterday. I guess it was related? I'm only guessing as I wasn't there. In the PE area. A sign of the times that the two are working hand-in-hand now though. Very chummy.
mandelsons_toenail
Posts: 1294
Joined: 08 Aug 2009, 18:16
Gender: Male
Location: Outer Hebrides

Re: National Delivery Review

Post by mandelsons_toenail »

I was privy to a visit from the cwu top brass and rm big wigs

It was weird, they wanted people to be brutally honest, and they were :Very Happy
The_Wax_Man
Posts: 191
Joined: 11 Nov 2011, 14:18
Gender: Male

Re: National Delivery Review

Post by The_Wax_Man »

mandelsons_toenail wrote:I was privy to a visit from the cwu top brass and rm big wigs

It was weird, they wanted people to be brutally honest, and they were :Very Happy

Good - I hope what was said and discussed was and has been taken on board by them and not a 'version' of it.

time will tell

:cuppa
Lincox
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 3485
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 18:07
Gender: Male

Re: National Delivery Review

Post by Lincox »

This would have been an isolated incident and not indicative of the rest of the sites that they visited. :oops: :oops:
daveyeff
Posts: 4699
Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
Gender: Male

Re: National Delivery Review

Post by daveyeff »

fishtank wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote:Did the union publish this or Royal Mail, because for the life of me all I see is Royal Mail propaganda.
It's straight from the blessed agreement itself DV, The Ten Commandments of a "can do culture" as laid down by Moya and to a lesser extent Dave.

By the way "can do culture" has got to be the new "Deal Of The Century"..... :Very Happy
its going to be like working for the ''LE QUINT-DICKEY'' mining company. :Very Happy
Hitcher
Posts: 1528
Joined: 20 Sep 2009, 09:59
Gender: Male

Re: National Delivery Review

Post by Hitcher »

Told today that we'll be lapsing another 2 duties from next week, this is apparently due to every office in the country having to lapse an extra 10%.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: National Delivery Review

Post by dvbuk55 »

Heard today that a few "rogue" managers are trying to implement the, as yet unannounced, "incentive scheme" - which involves, allegedly, no payment for overtime which will go into a savings pot - :hmmmm sounds remarkably similar to a previous scheme - hasn't been suggested here yet but it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest.
aiden01
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 7001
Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
Gender: Male

Re: National Delivery Review

Post by aiden01 »

dvbuk55 wrote:Heard today that a few "rogue" managers are trying to implement the, as yet unannounced, "incentive scheme" - which involves, allegedly, no payment for overtime which will go into a savings pot - :hmmmm sounds remarkably similar to a previous scheme - hasn't been suggested here yet but it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest.
There wil be no savings pot then who in there right mind would do ot for everyone else to benefit. :hmmmm
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: National Delivery Review

Post by dvbuk55 »

aiden01 wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote:Heard today that a few "rogue" managers are trying to implement the, as yet unannounced, "incentive scheme" - which involves, allegedly, no payment for overtime which will go into a savings pot - :hmmmm sounds remarkably similar to a previous scheme - hasn't been suggested here yet but it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest.
There wil be no savings pot then who in there right mind would do ot for everyone else to benefit. :hmmmm
Well we'll have to see what the maestros of negotiations have come up with, but I see a fair bit of flexibility, workload to manpower, lapsing. One scenario that may fly is when a duty is lapsed where OT might have been an option the duty is covered via flexibility and any "saved" hours are then put into the pot. These are the possibilities when the small print hasn't been written before the ballot.
BernardBresslaw
Posts: 381
Joined: 24 Nov 2011, 15:52
Gender: Male

Re: National Delivery Review

Post by BernardBresslaw »

This last week, our office has been absorbing rounds despite being above model week, in terms of traffic, and our reps are doing nothing about it. A worrying sign of things to come.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: National Delivery Review

Post by dvbuk55 »

BernardBresslaw wrote:This last week, our office has been absorbing rounds despite being above model week, in terms of traffic, and our reps are doing nothing about it. A worrying sign of things to come.
We haven't started official lapsing yet but odds and sods here and there is a fairly regular occurrence. Then again we are quite a number of staff short.
BernardBresslaw
Posts: 381
Joined: 24 Nov 2011, 15:52
Gender: Male

Re: National Delivery Review

Post by BernardBresslaw »

I take mine if I have time, but the point is, a week after signing a new agreement, a core aspect of it is already being ignored by managers and union both. It doesn't reassure you that any delivery revision in the future, will fare any better.
chrisj
Posts: 1883
Joined: 21 Dec 2010, 16:24
Gender: Male

Re: National Delivery Review

Post by chrisj »

From the CWU Voice Newsletter we now know of two of the offices taking part in the Review - it has started already!

Motherwell - Scotland:
99 employees
FT/PT of 52/47.
FT start time of 7am to 3 pm and PT starts at 9.45am

* For operational reasons Ft staff finishes 1 hour later than Pt (why and how?)
** CWU Unit Rep says 'sometimes they call the PT staff in early, for 8.30am and he also said that no-one comes in early to start and everyone takes their meal relief (break) :whistle

South Lambeth - London:
medium sized office
44 employees
FT/PT 36/8
FT starts at 6.00am and finish at 2pm

There are other Areas mentioned but not specific offices...
Last edited by chrisj on 09 Feb 2014, 17:06, edited 3 times in total.
daveyeff
Posts: 4699
Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
Gender: Male

Re: National Delivery Review

Post by daveyeff »

BernardBresslaw wrote:This last week, our office has been absorbing rounds despite being above model week, in terms of traffic, and our reps are doing nothing about it. A worrying sign of things to come.
we are absorbing most weeks. but when they are told ''we havent got time'' they say well ''manage your packets'',,,i.e. stand down your packets so you can get your lapsing done.....lapsing is supposed to be done if we havent got enough work to take us to our time. so willfully delaying packets to do more letters is an absurd contradiction of the very purpose of lapsing. gaffer says it easier to get loops of mail covered than packets....they are done at a later date. its a madhouse,,,,A MADHOUSE. :Very Happy