ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
BOYCOTT OF COMPETITORS’ MAIL – LEGAL POSITION
-
clashcityrocker
- Posts: 16689
- Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
- Gender: Male
- Location: strummerville
Re: BOYCOTT OF COMPETITORS’ MAIL – LEGAL POSITION
In fact I think the whole thing was a bit of a game played by RM and the CWU.
Neither side wants the end to end competition.
So we pretended we were considering boycotting DSA.
They rushed off to the High Court for an injunction to stop us doing something we never intended doing.
And we got some press coverage.
Neither side wants the end to end competition.
So we pretended we were considering boycotting DSA.
They rushed off to the High Court for an injunction to stop us doing something we never intended doing.
And we got some press coverage.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
-
daveyeff
- Posts: 4699
- Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
- Gender: Male
Re: BOYCOTT OF COMPETITORS’ MAIL – LEGAL POSITION
well that's not the impression dave ward and fat billys letter gives. I know there was plenty of people believed (I was among them) it was going to happen.clashcityrocker wrote:Why would they inquire about RM stopping it if they never had any intention of undertaking it?
There was never going to be Industrial Action on the basis of a consultative ballot.
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72727
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Re: BOYCOTT OF COMPETITORS’ MAIL – LEGAL POSITION
daveyeff wrote:well that's not the impression dave ward and fat billys letter gives. I know there was plenty of people believed (I was among them) it was going to happen.clashcityrocker wrote:Why would they inquire about RM stopping it if they never had any intention of undertaking it?
There was never going to be Industrial Action on the basis of a consultative ballot.
It still might -
Firstly, we will explore if there is any legal way of carrying out a future boycott as part of a properly constituted industrial action ballot
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Re: BOYCOTT OF COMPETITORS’ MAIL – LEGAL POSITION
clashcityrocker wrote:So we pretended we were considering boycotting DSA.
They rushed off to the High Court for an injunction to stop us doing something we never intended doing.
And we got some press coverage.
Meanwhile your members think you've caved in.
It may not turn out to be a very smart game in the long run.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
-
worktotime
- Posts: 2866
- Joined: 14 May 2010, 20:47
- Gender: Male
Re: BOYCOTT OF COMPETITORS’ MAIL – LEGAL POSITION
waste of time moya and the rest of her crooks with be laughing at us and the cwu
, more work , more savings , no pay rise etc , I see ia was mentioned again 1 day a week as usual waste of time I think its got to be rolling its s**t or bust now. the only way to shaft this company and the privatization .
-
cloherty1976
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 1236
- Joined: 11 Mar 2010, 12:16
- Gender: Male
- Location: The south
Re: BOYCOTT OF COMPETITORS’ MAIL – LEGAL POSITION
Remember there are always 2 winners in these negotiations and they are cwu and management and then the 1 loser and you know who that is us the postie. But that is life and you have to make the most of it
-
Martin Walsh
- Posts: 4276
- Joined: 19 Sep 2007, 20:12
- Location: neverland
Re: BOYCOTT OF COMPETITORS’ MAIL – LEGAL POSITION
The pay offer was a closed offer which means it cannot be revealed unless the union accepts it. The pay offer was also dependent on the CWU agreeing to the pension change , accepting the sell off , agreeing to an agenda for growth , a new IR agreement , a new governance model and a range of other issues.
The PEC rejected the offer yesterday , and no doubt Royal Mail will release the offer in due course. The CWU have also called a policy forum / special conference for late next month on pensions and what to do next and the PEC agreed that we will be balloting the membership for strike action in September over pensions , pay and the fact that Royal Mail won't sign into a legally binding agreements on protection of our pay and conditions , that no work is outsourced , that no delivery routes are franchised , that all new recruits are on the same pay and conditions , MTSF to be extended , all our agreements to be maintained unless re negotiated and a range of other issues.
The PEC rejected the offer yesterday , and no doubt Royal Mail will release the offer in due course. The CWU have also called a policy forum / special conference for late next month on pensions and what to do next and the PEC agreed that we will be balloting the membership for strike action in September over pensions , pay and the fact that Royal Mail won't sign into a legally binding agreements on protection of our pay and conditions , that no work is outsourced , that no delivery routes are franchised , that all new recruits are on the same pay and conditions , MTSF to be extended , all our agreements to be maintained unless re negotiated and a range of other issues.
-
daveyeff
- Posts: 4699
- Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
- Gender: Male
Re: BOYCOTT OF COMPETITORS’ MAIL – LEGAL POSITION
aboot time. thank you. that's cheered me up. ta. 
-
Martin Walsh
- Posts: 4276
- Joined: 19 Sep 2007, 20:12
- Location: neverland
Re: BOYCOTT OF COMPETITORS’ MAIL – LEGAL POSITION
It was no game. To get an injunction is not a case of winning an agreement as the actual case to do that maybe 9 months away. All Royal Mail wanted was to get an injunction which would have stopped the union from not only a boycott but balloting on actual strike action. The unions paid counsel advised that Royal Mail would get an injunction the union then agreed the words which now allow them to legally ballot for strike action.
-
daveyeff
- Posts: 4699
- Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
- Gender: Male
Re: BOYCOTT OF COMPETITORS’ MAIL – LEGAL POSITION
thanks for switching the light on dingo. its now clear. cheers
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72727
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Re: BOYCOTT OF COMPETITORS’ MAIL – LEGAL POSITION
Good news - lets hope the fighting talk for everyone stays at the same level. A war is coming, everyone needs to gird their loins.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Re: BOYCOTT OF COMPETITORS’ MAIL – LEGAL POSITION
We have to start communication with members now.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
-
daveyeff
- Posts: 4699
- Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
- Gender: Male
Re: BOYCOTT OF COMPETITORS’ MAIL – LEGAL POSITION
is that loins or LIONS.TrueBlueTerrier wrote:Good news - lets hope the fighting talk for everyone stays at the same level. A war is coming, everyone needs to gird their loins.
-
music4essex
- Posts: 717
- Joined: 15 Oct 2009, 16:18
- Gender: Female
Re: BOYCOTT OF COMPETITORS’ MAIL – LEGAL POSITION
Thanks Dingo for the update
Essex mum
-
hans solo
- Posts: 3279
- Joined: 06 Feb 2011, 18:08
- Gender: Male
Re: BOYCOTT OF COMPETITORS’ MAIL – LEGAL POSITION
AND WHY CAN A CLOSED OFFER NOT BE REVEALED
its not up to billy and dave to accept anything it should be put to members to decide
UNLESS CWU DONT WANT THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO KNOW
its not up to billy and dave to accept anything it should be put to members to decide
UNLESS CWU DONT WANT THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO KNOW