ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Long Term Fatigue Study of the Delivery Role

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72727
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Long Term Fatigue Study of the Delivery Role

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

with a lot of Image thrown in. :sad:
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Long Term Fatigue Study of the Delivery Role

Post by dvbuk55 »

By LONG TERM I assume it will be an ongoing study over a long term and that health and social studies will be investigated by qualified medical staff.
Rudolph_Hucker
Posts: 196
Joined: 21 Mar 2013, 18:19
Gender: Male
Location: Sorry but you don't have the necessary security clearance.

Re: Long Term Fatigue Study of the Delivery Role

Post by Rudolph_Hucker »

Don't know if this has any relevance but I wore a heart monitor once on my journey. On a shared town round with approx 1200 houses on an average day, In 4 hours 26 minutes I burned 942 calories. I was walking at my normal pace.

When I went to the gym regularly and did RPM classes (spinning on a static bike) for 45 minutes I would burn 450 - 500 calories each session and they were extremely hard work.

Therefore I'm doing the equivalent of two hard core spinning classes everyday .... No wonder I eat for England when I get home! :Very Happy
If you do a job too well, you’ll get stuck with it.
supernova
Posts: 6
Joined: 20 Sep 2012, 09:13
Gender: Female

Re: Long Term Fatigue Study of the Delivery Role

Post by supernova »

Might be quite interesting, hopefully, (but unlikely to be long term enough!), it will highlight the fact that the RM uniform is far from adequate for such a physically demanding role; I'm thinking of the shocking shoes they provide us with........my feet weep at the thought of putting those things on again on Monday.


I wonder whether they will ever consider studying the health implications of long term bullying and harassment in the RM workplace?
UnhappyGremlin
Posts: 2685
Joined: 18 May 2012, 20:49
Gender: Male
Location: Hiding

Re: Long Term Fatigue Study of the Delivery Role

Post by UnhappyGremlin »

supernova wrote:Might be quite interesting, hopefully, (but unlikely to be long term enough!), it will highlight the fact that the RM uniform is far from adequate for such a physically demanding role; I'm thinking of the shocking shoes they provide us with........my feet weep at the thought of putting those things on again on Monday.


I wonder whether they will ever consider studying the health implications of long term bullying and harassment in the RM workplace?
That would require them giving a s**t about the staff.
The results of this study will be largely ignored due to the inevitability of them not being what RM want to hear/know.
Any B&H study, though extremely unlikely to happen, would fall under the same problem. RM don't know, don't want to know and don't care. They just want to show willing, without ever promising to do anything about it.
Sometimes, I wish I wasn't a Rep.
martin the green
Posts: 157
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 16:20
Gender: Male

Re: Long Term Fatigue Study of the Delivery Role

Post by martin the green »

they will take as much notice of this as they do with cars on delivery.only when it suits them. :no no :arrrghhh
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Long Term Fatigue Study of the Delivery Role

Post by dvbuk55 »

Sugar wrote:No news, so as posted above its just a white wash?
We've had this carried out at our office 6 months ago and the follow up recently so I don't think there will be a report too soon. The team consisted of 2 Managers, one trained in psychometrics and the other a paper pusher, the third was a full time CWU Health and Safety rep who'd been on full time release since 1998.They didn't check that the correct equipment was being used on site, consequently the resulting monitor readings won't be fully accurate because the stress factor won't be the same, nor the delivery span.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Long Term Fatigue Study of the Delivery Role

Post by dvbuk55 »

Sugar wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote:We've had this carried out at our office 6 months ago and the follow up recently so I don't think there will be a report too soon. The team consisted of 2 Managers, one trained in psychometrics and the other a paper pusher, the third was a full time CWU Health and Safety rep who'd been on full time release since 1998.They didn't check that the correct equipment was being used on site, consequently the resulting monitor readings won't be fully accurate because the stress factor won't be the same, nor the delivery span.
So everything is well in deliveries and we shouldn't be moaning :roll:
Dunno yet the results not in - that's if we ever see it! Funny really you'd have thought it would have been done prior to revision as opposed to 3 years after it started.
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Long Term Fatigue Study of the Delivery Role

Post by fishtank »

TAn interim report will be published after 6 months
Anybody seen or heard of it? :roll:
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Long Term Fatigue Study of the Delivery Role

Post by dvbuk55 »

fishtank wrote:
TAn interim report will be published after 6 months
Anybody seen or heard of it? :roll:
They'll be lucky, the Study covered 12 months I think and the final study, certainly in our office was in October I think. Pretty pointless really and I don't expect any worthwhile result because the base data was wrong to begin with. The correct equipment wasn't being used and so it was just a time on delivery factor.

A more worthwhile study would be to collate all the sickness over the last 3 years by complaint. I am certain that stress has increased in the last 3 years but I wouldn't imagine that would show on a heart monitor. Strains and sprains, RSI and ruptures would more than likely have increased - all that data must surely be nationally readily available.