ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

eddie stobart

A forum for our Mail Centre, Processing and Distribution colleagues.
forestbodd
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 41
Joined: 19 Mar 2011, 15:10
Gender: Male

eddie stobart

Post by forestbodd »

why are eddie stobart drivers carrying our work around i thought we had put this to bed
kingofmcr
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 197
Joined: 13 Jun 2010, 10:02
Gender: Male

eddie stobart

Post by kingofmcr »

eddie stobart ?
Last edited by TrueBlueTerrier on 05 Sep 2011, 14:07, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Merged Post
THIS SHOULD BE ROYAL MAILS LOGO
"You may pronounce us guilty a thousand times over, but the goddess of the eternal court of history will smile and tear to tatters the verdict of this court - for she acquits us.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72597
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: eddie stobart

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

J H Dews

I take it we are naming logistic companies.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
forestbodd
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 41
Joined: 19 Mar 2011, 15:10
Gender: Male

Re: eddie stobart

Post by forestbodd »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:J H Dews

I take it we are naming logistic companies.
we name dhl and tnt why not stobart all part of the master plan
Stormproof
Posts: 6116
Joined: 07 Jul 2007, 21:03
Gender: Female

Re: eddie stobart

Post by Stormproof »

Norbert Dentressangle
Last edited by TrueBlueTerrier on 05 Sep 2011, 14:08, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Merged post
So keep on moving, moving, moving your feet
Keep on shuf-shuf-shuffling to this ghost dance beat
Just keep on walking down never ending streets


Illegitimi non carborundum
disheartened
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 464
Joined: 12 Jun 2007, 09:14
Gender: Male
Location: Down Sarf

Re: eddie stobart

Post by disheartened »

They now have their foot in the door and i believe the logistics will be the first part of Royal Mail to fall to the private sector,Eddie Stobart would love to buy the logistics,not only for the outlets it would give 'em,but for the shear prestige of shipping the Queens mail around the country :cuppa
dont permissum bastards frendo vos down
dohnut
Posts: 654
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:15
Gender: Male

Re: eddie stobart

Post by dohnut »

kingofmcr wrote:eddie stobart ?
wtf :nana
Last edited by TrueBlueTerrier on 05 Sep 2011, 14:08, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: merged post
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72597
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: eddie stobart

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

forestbodd wrote:
TrueBlueTerrier wrote:J H Dews

I take it we are naming logistic companies.
we name dhl and tnt why not stobart all part of the master plan
I think you missed my point - why did you post just Eddie Stobbart - for a debate we need context, discussion points and opinion. Just naming a company is just that nothing else. Care to expand on what point you are trying to get across.

Oh I see you have already started another thread, on this I'll merge them it will make your point a tad clearer.

Now merged - I have highlighted those merged from Blue Shirts to try and aid clarity.
Last edited by TrueBlueTerrier on 05 Sep 2011, 14:09, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: merged post
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
pinkpat
Posts: 20
Joined: 18 Oct 2009, 20:02
Gender: Male

Re: eddie stobart

Post by pinkpat »

After the sad death of Eddie Stobart they are going to make a film about his life...........it looks quite good, I've seen the trailer! :left: :left:
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Re: eddie stobart

Post by DGP1 »

RM to be split up and sold off.........................more money for the government than selling as one concern, PF, logistics, MCs all flogged off with only DOs and POs left (and both of those to be split up even further and sold off).
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: eddie stobart

Post by fishtank »

GLS will probably be first..as a pre-condition by the EU to allow state aid.
I'm not sure what financial value Logistics would have trying to sell it as a going concern. :neutral:
Logistics could possibly be put out to tender rather than sold off,someone like Stobart could win the contract and the existing members in Logistics would either transfer over under TUPE or be offered VR.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
heathrow86
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 136
Joined: 22 Oct 2008, 11:23
Gender: Male

Re: eddie stobart

Post by heathrow86 »

I was told that Rm were using Stobarts because they cannot get enough agency drivers in London and other places, due to the new Network 11 spread of work, plus summer leave as well!! For example London apparently have to many duties, and other vocs around the country have not enough duties for the drivers. Which if true is crazy.

I am a network driver and to be honest, i am quite concerned about being sold off to Stobarts or some other company. Still i'm sure the National talks under Dave Ward and co will see us right.
SpacePhoenix
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 12098
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
Gender: Male

Re: eddie stobart

Post by SpacePhoenix »

fishtank wrote:GLS will probably be first..as a pre-condition by the EU to allow state aid.
I'm not sure what financial value Logistics would have trying to sell it as a going concern. :neutral:
Logistics could possibly be put out to tender rather than sold off,someone like Stobart could win the contract and the existing members in Logistics would either transfer over under TUPE or be offered VR.
I wouldn't be surprised to see the distribution function in MCs transfered over to logisitcs. RM were supposed to be transfering distribution functions over, have they gone over yet at any MC?
DGP1 wrote:RM to be split up and sold off.........................more money for the government than selling as one concern, PF, logistics, MCs all flogged off with only DOs and POs left (and both of those to be split up even further and sold off).
MCs would be free to use whoever they wanted for deliveries and POs could sell services for all of RMs current rivals. My guess is that logisitics and rdcs would all be taken by one company.
disheartened
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 464
Joined: 12 Jun 2007, 09:14
Gender: Male
Location: Down Sarf

Re: eddie stobart

Post by disheartened »

heathrow86 wrote:I was told that Rm were using Stobarts because they cannot get enough agency drivers in London and other places, due to the new Network 11 spread of work, plus summer leave as well!! For example London apparently have to many duties, and other vocs around the country have not enough duties for the drivers. Which if true is crazy.
Our Mail Centre is shutting in October,we have 7.5 drivers with LGV 1 & 2 licence's who want to transfer to Greenford,PRDC and Heathrow but have been told NO,they can not get vr either and will be transfering to the new gaff at Hemel
dont permissum bastards frendo vos down
dodger162
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 161
Joined: 04 Jun 2010, 20:39
Gender: Male

Re: eddie stobart

Post by dodger162 »

Remember in the 90's there was a plan to sell off RM Streamline. That has effectively happened now with DSA except that RM did not receive any proceeds from the policy.
Has any other large transport fleet outsourced it's transport? BT? It would be a huge undertaking for any compancy to take on RM Logistics and don't forget the advertising benefits of having Royal Mail on so many 40 foot trailers so I doubt we will need to be concerned about this for years. And do RM really want the break up of the Business, I doubt it.