Royal Mail accounts to be revealed.......

pilsbury · Post by **pilsbury** » 20 Aug 2007, 19:57

Oops sorry, i think i went abit over the top with that one.Did not not mean to offend anyone.

L Tommo · Post by **L Tommo** » 20 Aug 2007, 20:55

WELL POSTMAN.... Im agast at the bad Rep we have???

I really think YOU, THE MODS, AND ALL OF US WITH A SENSE OF FAIR PLAY HAVE THIS SITE DOWN QUITE TIGHT... I KNOW THE SWEARING AND EMOTICOMS ARE A BIT HEAVY But its industrial language and shouldnt be stepped on or beaten because of a few arseholes and people WE the CWU have a beef about and them and there good friends in the media and scab safe houses.. We have to toe the line...????

WELL THATS A SAD DAY WHEN THAT HAPPENDS!!!

I wont be posting my views IF we all are supposed to be good little boys n girls!!! FECK EM!!!!

OUT :cfo :lfo AND YA MATE MURDER-OCH..

Post by **moon71** » 20 Aug 2007, 21:19

Just a quick reminder, but exactly how many of you are working for the Royal Mail communications department. Seems to me, the screws are everywhere , watching , reading an typing.........

Post by **POSTMAN** » 20 Aug 2007, 22:43

Tommo/Moon not RM's doin

Give me a couple of days

jafferpants · Post by **jafferpants** » 21 Aug 2007, 13:18

PISLBURY IF PEOPLE WERE OFFENDED AT WHAT YOU SAID IT'S A GOOD JOB THEY DON'T WORK IN OUR OFFICE CAUSE THAT WAS QUITE MILD. IV'E ALWAYS SAID THE APLICATION FORMS FOR RM JOBS SHOULD STATE IN BIG BOLD LETTERS "NOT FOR THE SENSITIVE". IF YOU CANT STAND THE HEAT KEEP OUT THE OF THE KITCHEN.

Big Daz · Post by **Big Daz** » 21 Aug 2007, 14:16

moon71 wrote:Just a quick reminder, but exactly how many of you are working for the Royal Mail communications department. Seems to me, the screws are everywhere , watching , reading an typing.........

Not me I am a bona fida CWU rep!

Big Daz · Post by **Big Daz** » 21 Aug 2007, 14:22

brisomerset wrote:
pilsbury wrote:There are words for people like you:
PLEASE where our the moderators on here? I enjoy this site not to read such language. BANTER yes but SW***RING NO I can only apoligise to any female readers? If you had said that to me to my face you would have been straight out of the door. Calm down mate.

Female readers ? Deciding if some thing is accetable behaviour/language should not be made on the basis of gender!

frankie · Post by **frankie** » 21 Aug 2007, 14:43

No offence taken boys, everyone needs to let off a little steam, especially in our line of work. Have been known to put a dockers to shame, especially when my hormones go into orbit!!!!!!

jafferpants · Post by **jafferpants** » 21 Aug 2007, 16:35

FRANKIE I ALWAYS THOUGHT A HOARMOANE WAS MY MISSUS NAGGING

L Tommo · Post by **L Tommo** » 21 Aug 2007, 17:24

jafferpants!!!

I can hear now the cases being dragged off the wardrobe and YOUR pants n sock draw opened.... GULP!!!

Well if your stuck for a gaff to get ya nut down for a few days i will send you my addy and you can kip on my settee/bed...

Breakfast not included...

OUT

HAHAHAHAHAHHA!!!! good joke tho jaffs mate!

jafferpants · Post by **jafferpants** » 21 Aug 2007, 17:46

tommo thanks for the offer, it's nice to know i wont be out on the street .

dogfood · Post by **dogfood** » 28 Aug 2007, 21:47

I have written to RM and have asked for the annual report and accounts under the freedom of information act 2000. They will now under law, have 20 days to respond.

I will keep you posted (no pun intended).

I have received a reply which I have typed below;

Dear

Re: Information Request

Thank you for your request under the Freedom of Information Act for a photocopy of Royal Mail's annual Report and Accounts for 2006-07. I am pleased to enclose a copy of the Royal Mail Holdings plc interim Report for the half year ending 24 September 2006. Unfortunately at this stage I can't provide a copy of the final Report and Accounts for 2006-07, as these have not yet been published. Once ready, the Report and Accounts for 2006-07 will be published on our internet site (www.royalmailgroup.com) where you can also access REports and Accounts for previous years.

Information intended for future publication is exempt from disclosure under Section 22 of the Freedom of Information Act - this exemption applies to enable public authorities to publish information at the most appropriate time and only once all necessary processes and checks have been completed. The exemption is subject to the 'public interest test'; however we don't believe there is a public interest in the early disclosure of information in the yet to be finalised Report and Accounts and therefore in this case consider that the public interest is best met by maintaining the exemption.

If you are unhappy with this reply you do have a right to request an internal review - please write to: Head of Information Compliance, Royal Mail House....etc..etc..

If having requested an internal review, you are still not satisfied with our response you also have a right to appeal to the Information Commissioner who can be contacted at:.........

Yours Sincerely

Freedom of Information Officer.

I will request an internal review as I can't see how it can be in the interests of the public for a publicly owned organisation to with hold its accounts from the people that fund it.

I would appreciate any thoughts,

Ooh by the way they failed to enclose the half year interim report. Why doesn't that surprise me?

vigilante · Post by **vigilante** » 28 Aug 2007, 22:06

Information intended for future publication is exempt from disclosure under Section 22 of the Freedom of Information Act - this exemption applies to enable public authorities to publish information at the most appropriate time and only once all necessary processes and checks have been completed. The exemption is subject to the 'public interest test'; however we don't believe there is a public interest in the early disclosure of information in the yet to be finalised Report and Accounts and therefore in this case consider that the public interest is best met by maintaining the exemption.

OF COURSE IT'S IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST!!!
THEY WANT TO KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON WITH RM!! POST PEOPLE STRIKING-----HELLLOOOO!!!
ANOTHER GOVERNMENT LED COVER UP (ALLEGEDLY), STOP MAKING EXCUSES GOVERNMENT AND POSTCOMM AND SHOW US THE
TRUE FIGURES

dogfood · Post by **dogfood** » 28 Aug 2007, 22:09

OF COURSE IT'S IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST!!!
THEY WANT TO KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON WITH RM!! POST PEOPLE STRIKING-----HELLLOOOO!!!
ANOTHER GOVERNMENT LED COVER UP (ALLEGEDLY), STOP MAKING EXCUSES GOVERNMENT AND POSTCOMM AND SHOW US THE F******G
TRUE FIGURES

CornishRep do you think I should word my appeal like that?

DGP1 · Post by **DGP1** » 28 Aug 2007, 22:12

You could try this