Hours out and job losses?

oypostie · Post by **oypostie** » 27 Sep 2010, 21:50

As you can imagine if this applied in our place then RM would be looking to get rid of the less dependable of us first.

Didn't realise they were looking to get rid of the management yet

floydy · Post by **floydy** » 28 Sep 2010, 17:28

What happened to No compulsory redundencies

gb93 · Post by **gb93** » 28 Sep 2010, 17:58

floydy wrote:What happened to No compulsory redundencies

That is not in the agreement.

fishtank · Post by **fishtank** » 28 Sep 2010, 18:13

 In addition to the job security commitments contained in the MTSF Agreement - Royal Mail and CWU confirm that the overarching objective is to deliver the transformation without recourse to compulsory redundancies

over·arch·ing (-iŋ)
adjective
1.encompassing or linking all that is within its scope, range, etc.: an overarching theory, theme, etc.
2.bollox speak

ob·jec·tive (əb jek′tiv, äb-)
adjective
1.being the aim or goal: an objective point
2.more bollox speak

Pat Ostman · Post by **Pat Ostman** » 01 Oct 2010, 13:01

fishtank wrote:
 In addition to the job security commitments contained in the MTSF Agreement - Royal Mail and CWU confirm that the overarching objective is to deliver the transformation without recourse to compulsory redundancies
over·arch·ing (-iŋ)
adjective
1.encompassing or linking all that is within its scope, range, etc.: an overarching theory, theme, etc.
2.bollox speak

ob·jec·tive (əb jek′tiv, äb-)
adjective
1.being the aim or goal: an objective point
2.more bollox speak.

Postal1 · Post by **Postal1** » 01 Oct 2010, 15:38

yeah our office is on the final revision. We've been van sharing for over a year now. Letter sorting machines are in. Now we're being told that deliveries are going to 4hr 30mins long.
I've gotta say people are well upset as lots of rounds can't be done now. Looking at the revision rounds have had another 1hr to 1hr 30mins added. Totally insane rounds along with 5 lots of d2d we're already seeing. Funny thing is with four rounds going from my section no buydowns or redundancies offered. I can really see this leading to all out strike again.

Post by **General Mannerheim** » 01 Oct 2010, 17:26

RM have been using the Matrix system in our office for years.....only up here it is called SAFTP ......Sack All Full Time Posties.

Pat Ostman · Post by **Pat Ostman** » 01 Oct 2010, 18:20

General Mannerheim wrote:RM have been using the Matrix system in our office for years.....only up here it is called SAFTP ......Sack All Full Time Posties.

Here they call it SEUTNOL

Sack everyone until there is no-one left

vigilante · Post by **vigilante** » 03 Oct 2010, 19:38

Ahebban wrote:To a large extent, posties are contributing to their own downfall with the continued, and out-dated, obsession of early starts/early finishes!!!! My sympathies lie with local Reps having to fight local Managers with hollow arguments because posties choose to bury their heads and then blame the CWU when losses of hours, duties and jobs are incurred!

Exactly right mate!!!

ROYALMAILCHAT

Hours out and job losses?

Re: Hours out and job losses?

Re: Hours out and job losses?

Re: Hours out and job losses?

Re: Hours out and job losses?

Re: Hours out and job losses?

Re: Hours out and job losses?

Re: Hours out and job losses?

Re: Hours out and job losses?

Re: Hours out and job losses?