ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

TUC Family Friendly Rights

Download forum where important downloads and agreements are available.
brothermagrew
Posts: 3015
Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 16:38
Gender: Male
Location: Shares a border with England to the south.

TUC Family Friendly Rights

Post by brothermagrew »

Newly launched by the TUC.

familyfriendlyguide.pdf
Now keep the comments clean :whistle
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"Today’s workplace has become heartless and soulless. Employees are seen as units of labour, automatons, functionaries, objects for achieving designated tasks, and as costs to be minimised."
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: TUC Family Friendly Rights

Post by dvbuk55 »

Well my comments are clean but not complimentary - I am 64 this year, I am not a carer, I have no dependent children so what's in it for me? Absolutely bugger all. Should I and people like me, who struggled to bring up a family without family credit, nursery care etc etc have to stand at the back whilst others cherry pick because of family friendly policies?

How about family friendly policies for the over sixties, shorter working week of 4 days, free time to enjoy hobbies, walk the dog. What do we get - another 5 years to work and an extra wait for the pension? I say NO let them eat cake!
REDLETTER
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 748
Joined: 27 Oct 2008, 19:00
Gender: Male
Location: EX-ROYAL MAIL

Re: TUC Family Friendly Rights

Post by REDLETTER »

dvbuk55 wrote:Well my comments are clean but not complimentary - I am 64 this year, I am not a carer, I have no dependent children so what's in it for me? Absolutely bugger all. Should I and people like me, who struggled to bring up a family without family credit, nursery care etc etc have to stand at the back whilst others cherry pick because of family friendly policies?

How about family friendly policies for the over sixties, shorter working week of 4 days, free time to enjoy hobbies, walk the dog. What do we get - another 5 years to work and an extra wait for the pension? I say NO let them eat cake!
You don't qualify! you had your fun on the 60's now suck it up and grow old gracefully :wink: :Very Happy

You could try and adopt like Madonna! or go looking for an even older "grey" person to befriend and become their carer :crazy:

You've got a free bus pass haven't you? :cuppa
andy2007
Posts: 3971
Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 10:16
Gender: Male
Location: Earth

Re: TUC Family Friendly Rights

Post by andy2007 »

dvbuk55 wrote:Well my comments are clean but not complimentary - I am 64 this year, I am not a carer, I have no dependent children so what's in it for me? Absolutely bugger all. Should I and people like me, who struggled to bring up a family without family credit, nursery care etc etc have to stand at the back whilst others cherry pick because of family friendly policies?

How about family friendly policies for the over sixties, shorter working week of 4 days, free time to enjoy hobbies, walk the dog. What do we get - another 5 years to work and an extra wait for the pension? I say NO let them eat cake!
These days, people rarely have the backup they had 30+ years ago. So it's much harder to get appropriate care for their children. It took a couple of decades for Family Friendly to come in to close the breach (better late than never eh?!? :d'oh! ).

When I was a child in the '70's, my Parents could count on Friends to look after me and my Sister (we had real Communities back then), until they got Home from work. How many people can still do that now? :hmmmm
And there were also a lot more Housewives back then too. Whereas Women aren't discriminated against as much at work these days.

I'm not saying it was easy back then. But it's a damn sight harder now. People are afraid of letting their neighbours look after their Children nowadays. More people have careers, until they retire. By which time, they can't always cope with small Children running around their House for hours. :hmmmm
Don't knock Insanity
it's just another outlook on Reality!
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: TUC Family Friendly Rights

Post by dvbuk55 »

Where the hell have you two been for the last 6 months - looking after the kids, too tired to post........................bloody hell, in my day we just shut them in the shed with a jam jar full of water and a couple of crusts whilst me and the wife went down to the pub :whistle :chuckle :chuckle :chuckle
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72616
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: TUC Family Friendly Rights

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

dvbuk55 wrote:Where the hell have you two been for the last 6 months - looking after the kids, too tired to post........................bloody hell, in my day we just shut them in the shed with a jam jar full of water and a couple of crusts whilst me and the wife went down to the pub :whistle :chuckle :chuckle :chuckle
Had 't mill sacked them then. :chuckle :chuckle :chuckle
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: TUC Family Friendly Rights

Post by dvbuk55 »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote:Where the hell have you two been for the last 6 months - looking after the kids, too tired to post........................bloody hell, in my day we just shut them in the shed with a jam jar full of water and a couple of crusts whilst me and the wife went down to the pub :whistle :chuckle :chuckle :chuckle
Had 't mill sacked them then. :chuckle :chuckle :chuckle
Tell me TBT,am I going senile or are you replying to the post about Luddites? :chuckle
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72616
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: TUC Family Friendly Rights

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

dvbuk55 wrote:
TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote:Where the hell have you two been for the last 6 months - looking after the kids, too tired to post........................bloody hell, in my day we just shut them in the shed with a jam jar full of water and a couple of crusts whilst me and the wife went down to the pub :whistle :chuckle :chuckle :chuckle
Had 't mill sacked them then. :chuckle :chuckle :chuckle
Tell me TBT,am I going senile or are you replying to the post about Luddites? :chuckle
No I saw that after but I can see why it caused confusion. :Very Happy :Very Happy
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: TUC Family Friendly Rights

Post by dvbuk55 »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote:
TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote:Where the hell have you two been for the last 6 months - looking after the kids, too tired to post........................bloody hell, in my day we just shut them in the shed with a jam jar full of water and a couple of crusts whilst me and the wife went down to the pub :whistle :chuckle :chuckle :chuckle
Had 't mill sacked them then. :chuckle :chuckle :chuckle
Tell me TBT,am I going senile or are you replying to the post about Luddites? :chuckle
No I saw that after but I can see why it caused confusion. :Very Happy :Very Happy
You meant the kids at the mill, right, well senile old me - because it was the chimney sweep who sacked them, the filthy little urchins. :chuckle :chuckle