Now keep the comments clean
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
TUC Family Friendly Rights
-
brothermagrew
- Posts: 3015
- Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 16:38
- Gender: Male
- Location: Shares a border with England to the south.
TUC Family Friendly Rights
Newly launched by the TUC.
Now keep the comments clean
Now keep the comments clean
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"Today’s workplace has become heartless and soulless. Employees are seen as units of labour, automatons, functionaries, objects for achieving designated tasks, and as costs to be minimised."
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: TUC Family Friendly Rights
Well my comments are clean but not complimentary - I am 64 this year, I am not a carer, I have no dependent children so what's in it for me? Absolutely bugger all. Should I and people like me, who struggled to bring up a family without family credit, nursery care etc etc have to stand at the back whilst others cherry pick because of family friendly policies?
How about family friendly policies for the over sixties, shorter working week of 4 days, free time to enjoy hobbies, walk the dog. What do we get - another 5 years to work and an extra wait for the pension? I say NO let them eat cake!
How about family friendly policies for the over sixties, shorter working week of 4 days, free time to enjoy hobbies, walk the dog. What do we get - another 5 years to work and an extra wait for the pension? I say NO let them eat cake!
-
REDLETTER
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 748
- Joined: 27 Oct 2008, 19:00
- Gender: Male
- Location: EX-ROYAL MAIL
Re: TUC Family Friendly Rights
You don't qualify! you had your fun on the 60's now suck it up and grow old gracefullydvbuk55 wrote:Well my comments are clean but not complimentary - I am 64 this year, I am not a carer, I have no dependent children so what's in it for me? Absolutely bugger all. Should I and people like me, who struggled to bring up a family without family credit, nursery care etc etc have to stand at the back whilst others cherry pick because of family friendly policies?
How about family friendly policies for the over sixties, shorter working week of 4 days, free time to enjoy hobbies, walk the dog. What do we get - another 5 years to work and an extra wait for the pension? I say NO let them eat cake!
You could try and adopt like Madonna! or go looking for an even older "grey" person to befriend and become their carer
You've got a free bus pass haven't you?
-
andy2007
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 10:16
- Gender: Male
- Location: Earth
Re: TUC Family Friendly Rights
These days, people rarely have the backup they had 30+ years ago. So it's much harder to get appropriate care for their children. It took a couple of decades for Family Friendly to come in to close the breach (better late than never eh?!?dvbuk55 wrote:Well my comments are clean but not complimentary - I am 64 this year, I am not a carer, I have no dependent children so what's in it for me? Absolutely bugger all. Should I and people like me, who struggled to bring up a family without family credit, nursery care etc etc have to stand at the back whilst others cherry pick because of family friendly policies?
How about family friendly policies for the over sixties, shorter working week of 4 days, free time to enjoy hobbies, walk the dog. What do we get - another 5 years to work and an extra wait for the pension? I say NO let them eat cake!
When I was a child in the '70's, my Parents could count on Friends to look after me and my Sister (we had real Communities back then), until they got Home from work. How many people can still do that now?
And there were also a lot more Housewives back then too. Whereas Women aren't discriminated against as much at work these days.
I'm not saying it was easy back then. But it's a damn sight harder now. People are afraid of letting their neighbours look after their Children nowadays. More people have careers, until they retire. By which time, they can't always cope with small Children running around their House for hours.
Don't knock Insanity
it's just another outlook on Reality!
it's just another outlook on Reality!
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: TUC Family Friendly Rights
Where the hell have you two been for the last 6 months - looking after the kids, too tired to post........................bloody hell, in my day we just shut them in the shed with a jam jar full of water and a couple of crusts whilst me and the wife went down to the pub

-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72616
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Re: TUC Family Friendly Rights
Had 't mill sacked them then.dvbuk55 wrote:Where the hell have you two been for the last 6 months - looking after the kids, too tired to post........................bloody hell, in my day we just shut them in the shed with a jam jar full of water and a couple of crusts whilst me and the wife went down to the pub![]()
![]()
![]()
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: TUC Family Friendly Rights
Tell me TBT,am I going senile or are you replying to the post about Luddites?TrueBlueTerrier wrote:Had 't mill sacked them then.dvbuk55 wrote:Where the hell have you two been for the last 6 months - looking after the kids, too tired to post........................bloody hell, in my day we just shut them in the shed with a jam jar full of water and a couple of crusts whilst me and the wife went down to the pub![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72616
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Re: TUC Family Friendly Rights
No I saw that after but I can see why it caused confusion.dvbuk55 wrote:Tell me TBT,am I going senile or are you replying to the post about Luddites?TrueBlueTerrier wrote:Had 't mill sacked them then.dvbuk55 wrote:Where the hell have you two been for the last 6 months - looking after the kids, too tired to post........................bloody hell, in my day we just shut them in the shed with a jam jar full of water and a couple of crusts whilst me and the wife went down to the pub![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: TUC Family Friendly Rights
You meant the kids at the mill, right, well senile old me - because it was the chimney sweep who sacked them, the filthy little urchins.TrueBlueTerrier wrote:No I saw that after but I can see why it caused confusion.dvbuk55 wrote:Tell me TBT,am I going senile or are you replying to the post about Luddites?TrueBlueTerrier wrote:Had 't mill sacked them then.dvbuk55 wrote:Where the hell have you two been for the last 6 months - looking after the kids, too tired to post........................bloody hell, in my day we just shut them in the shed with a jam jar full of water and a couple of crusts whilst me and the wife went down to the pub![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()