ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

The New Delivery Supplement Explained

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
Razzamadazz
Posts: 57
Joined: 19 May 2007, 21:04

Re: The New Delivery Supplement Explained

Post by Razzamadazz »

garymgo wrote:Dave "razzamadazz" Ward
Ha ha ha ha ha if you say so. I'm just a normal area delivery rep who has spent time reading and trying to understand a new agreement 'for the benefit of the members I represent I might add', that will affect us all. I work for Royal Mail too, it'll affect me just as much as it will any other employee.
Dogs of War
Posts: 474
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 21:00
Gender: Female

Re: The New Delivery Supplement Explained

Post by Dogs of War »

Stick your figures up your arse. You must be getting very well paid by the CWU to get this deal through.
Razzamadazz
Posts: 57
Joined: 19 May 2007, 21:04

Re: The New Delivery Supplement Explained

Post by Razzamadazz »

Dogs of War wrote:Stick your figures up your arse. You must be getting very well paid by the CWU to get this deal through.
That's it, typical, you don't like someone elses view so you become abusive. Aren't there rules on here about that?
proper postie
Posts: 328
Joined: 11 Mar 2010, 18:26
Gender: Male

Re: The New Delivery Supplement Explained

Post by proper postie »

Razzamadazz wrote: There's none so blind as those who don't want to see.
In the kingdom of the blind,the one eyed man is king....
Razzamadazz
Posts: 57
Joined: 19 May 2007, 21:04

Re: The New Delivery Supplement Explained

Post by Razzamadazz »

provo postie wrote:
Razzamadazz wrote: There's none so blind as those who don't want to see.
In the kingdom of the blind,the one eyed man is king....
Ha ha ha ha ha very good, but doesn't an ostrich stand on one leg as it buries it's head in the sand?
Danelectro
Posts: 1058
Joined: 13 Apr 2008, 01:02

Re: The New Delivery Supplement Explained

Post by Danelectro »

Razzamadazz wrote: 2010 & Beyond agreement states: ‘In the interim to ensure that D2D workload is covered effectively in line with this agreement, and in advance of units realigning duties through full revision activity to take account of D2D, resourcing of hours associated with the workload linked to D2D will be dealt with through locally agreed interim arrangements and reviewed through the weekly resourcing meetings in all delivery units. To aid the transition, offices that have not deployed delivery methods revisions will have to provide genuine and demonstrable solutions to any weight or volumetric issues’.
Split you bags up i can hear the DOM say,but that will take me longer say i-How says DOM?

Going by past experience all this workshop and locally agreed workloads will mean more bullying from managers to complete.This part of the agreement needs serious amendments anything less is not acceptable,they may as well pay Dave Joyce off.
Razzamadazz
Posts: 57
Joined: 19 May 2007, 21:04

Re: The New Delivery Supplement Explained

Post by Razzamadazz »

In the kingdom of the blind,the one eyed man is king....
Thank you, take a look to your left.
Razzamadazz
Posts: 57
Joined: 19 May 2007, 21:04

Re: The New Delivery Supplement Explained

Post by Razzamadazz »

Danelectro wrote:
Razzamadazz wrote: 2010 & Beyond agreement states: ‘In the interim to ensure that D2D workload is covered effectively in line with this agreement, and in advance of units realigning duties through full revision activity to take account of D2D, resourcing of hours associated with the workload linked to D2D will be dealt with through locally agreed interim arrangements and reviewed through the weekly resourcing meetings in all delivery units. To aid the transition, offices that have not deployed delivery methods revisions will have to provide genuine and demonstrable solutions to any weight or volumetric issues’.
Split you bags up i can hear the DOM say,but that will take me longer say i-How says DOM?

Going by past experience all this workshop and locally agreed workloads will mean more bullying from managers to complete.This part of the agreement needs serious amendments anything less is not acceptable,they may as well pay Dave Joyce off.
It's a leap of faith my friend, but what is the alternative?
feduppostie
Posts: 947
Joined: 24 Jun 2007, 19:46

Re: The New Delivery Supplement Explained

Post by feduppostie »

we do this job, we are the union, we decide if it is good or not

it is our decision

we can read and make our own minds up

frankly spin is for new labour and it didn't really do them any good did it
proper postie
Posts: 328
Joined: 11 Mar 2010, 18:26
Gender: Male

Re: The New Delivery Supplement Explained

Post by proper postie »

Razzamadazz wrote:
In the kingdom of the blind,the one eyed man is king....
Thank you, take a look to your left.
Hadn't actually noticed that when I posted!
mr deeds
Posts: 212
Joined: 18 Sep 2008, 17:23
Gender: Female

Re: The New Delivery Supplement Explained

Post by mr deeds »

Razzamadazz wrote:
Danelectro wrote:
Razzamadazz wrote: 2010 & Beyond agreement states: ‘In the interim to ensure that D2D workload is covered effectively in line with this agreement, and in advance of units realigning duties through full revision activity to take account of D2D, resourcing of hours associated with the workload linked to D2D will be dealt with through locally agreed interim arrangements and reviewed through the weekly resourcing meetings in all delivery units. To aid the transition, offices that have not deployed delivery methods revisions will have to provide genuine and demonstrable solutions to any weight or volumetric issues’.
Split you bags up i can hear the DOM say,but that will take me longer say i-How says DOM?

Going by past experience all this workshop and locally agreed workloads will mean more bullying from managers to complete.This part of the agreement needs serious amendments anything less is not acceptable,they may as well pay Dave Joyce off.
It's a leap of faith my friend, but what is the alternative?

shove it i work 40 hrs a week and get paid 40 hrs a week there is a point where i think we can have a deal perhaps £40 a week d2d for delivery staff with unlimeted d2d the cwu have lost the vision at the moment just looking out for there self (there were more pages in the agreement protecting the union than the membership) we can have a deal...but i think the top cwu have to speak to the grass roots... otherwise when we fall ..we will take every one of you with us
mr deeds
Posts: 212
Joined: 18 Sep 2008, 17:23
Gender: Female

Re: The New Delivery Supplement Explained

Post by mr deeds »

Razzamadazz wrote:
Danelectro wrote:
Razzamadazz wrote: 2010 & Beyond agreement states: ‘In the interim to ensure that D2D workload is covered effectively in line with this agreement, and in advance of units realigning duties through full revision activity to take account of D2D, resourcing of hours associated with the workload linked to D2D will be dealt with through locally agreed interim arrangements and reviewed through the weekly resourcing meetings in all delivery units. To aid the transition, offices that have not deployed delivery methods revisions will have to provide genuine and demonstrable solutions to any weight or volumetric issues’.
Split you bags up i can hear the DOM say,but that will take me longer say i-How says DOM?

Going by past experience all this workshop and locally agreed workloads will mean more bullying from managers to complete.This part of the agreement needs serious amendments anything less is not acceptable,they may as well pay Dave Joyce off.
It's a leap of faith my friend, but what is the alternative?

said the lemminng
Lemuel
Posts: 42
Joined: 16 Feb 2010, 23:50
Gender: Male

Re: The New Delivery Supplement Explained

Post by Lemuel »

an equally important part of the D2D into workload argument is the effect on indoor and outdoor time. I will need more time in prepping and delivering more D2D. My duty should be shortened, to accomodate D2D and the shorter working week.
RM have used the "fewer letters" argument to drive part time work as D2D replace letters their argument falls, restoring full time levels.

This,as always, is a negotiators agreement. It is up to reps - if the agreement is voted in - to negotiate these issues with the force of a national union behind them.

D2D into workload is the right strategy, however this does not disguise that members doing 3 D2D a week will lose pay.
Danelectro
Posts: 1058
Joined: 13 Apr 2008, 01:02

Re: The New Delivery Supplement Explained

Post by Danelectro »

Razzamadazz wrote:
Danelectro wrote:
Razzamadazz wrote: 2010 & Beyond agreement states: ‘In the interim to ensure that D2D workload is covered effectively in line with this agreement, and in advance of units realigning duties through full revision activity to take account of D2D, resourcing of hours associated with the workload linked to D2D will be dealt with through locally agreed interim arrangements and reviewed through the weekly resourcing meetings in all delivery units. To aid the transition, offices that have not deployed delivery methods revisions will have to provide genuine and demonstrable solutions to any weight or volumetric issues’.
Split you bags up i can hear the DOM say,but that will take me longer say i-How says DOM?

Going by past experience all this workshop and locally agreed workloads will mean more bullying from managers to complete.This part of the agreement needs serious amendments anything less is not acceptable,they may as well pay Dave Joyce off.
It's a leap of faith my friend, but what is the alternative?
I think you know the alternative,HQ promised an independent review of workloads and from that achievable performance standards could be set ie if we are now agreeing to use geo route, then why is the walkspeed not in the agreement,there is only one kind of walking it dosnt vary from area to area.

Also when ive mentioned the 5kg max weight delivering mostly upstairs rule to my area rep he said 'that cant be right,that would mean a removal man couldnt carry a wardrobe upstairs!?! :arrrghhh
Razzamadazz
Posts: 57
Joined: 19 May 2007, 21:04

Re: The New Delivery Supplement Explained

Post by Razzamadazz »

mr deeds wrote:
Razzamadazz wrote:
Danelectro wrote:
Razzamadazz wrote: 2010 & Beyond agreement states: ‘In the interim to ensure that D2D workload is covered effectively in line with this agreement, and in advance of units realigning duties through full revision activity to take account of D2D, resourcing of hours associated with the workload linked to D2D will be dealt with through locally agreed interim arrangements and reviewed through the weekly resourcing meetings in all delivery units. To aid the transition, offices that have not deployed delivery methods revisions will have to provide genuine and demonstrable solutions to any weight or volumetric issues’.
Split you bags up i can hear the DOM say,but that will take me longer say i-How says DOM?

Going by past experience all this workshop and locally agreed workloads will mean more bullying from managers to complete.This part of the agreement needs serious amendments anything less is not acceptable,they may as well pay Dave Joyce off.
It's a leap of faith my friend, but what is the alternative?

said the lemminng
Now Now, the same could be said of the no voters, I'm basing my opinions on Facts, Figures, Reality and Understanding.