ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

N. Lancs and Cumbria Branch recommend 'no'!

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
phantomshare
Posts: 252
Joined: 29 Jan 2007, 19:10

Re: N. Lancs and Cumbria Branch recommend 'no'!

Post by phantomshare »

I was at Manchester today (so i hope that dispels some views that i am a manager)

But i will tell you this, on D2D which is the big swaying point on this agreement because of the monetary issue's, what we were told today was that D2D as they we know them are unsustainable, RM will lose contracts or withdraw them from certain regions, I know that some member would like this but would they be as jubliant when there receiving none, would the £20.60 payment seem like a good thing then after the boat had sailed?

I don't know what the thinking behind this branches recomendation is, but if they like the prospect of compulsary redundancies or a part time work force in the future then i cannot understand there logic.

if they were at Manchester i find it hard to believe they would recommend suicide.
MinisterofCucumber
Posts: 806
Joined: 15 Dec 2009, 22:18
Gender: Male

Re: N. Lancs and Cumbria Branch recommend 'no'!

Post by MinisterofCucumber »

If you vote with your conscience, there is only one way to vote.

Who seriously thinks it is acceptable for one set of human beings to decide that another group should have their pay and conditions worsened?

The German people repeatedly voted in the Nazis because the majority's standard of living rose on the backs of a suffering minority.
"You wanna f**k with me? Okay. You wanna play rough? Okay. Say hello to my little friend!" - Tony Montana
postietaz
Posts: 271
Joined: 23 Sep 2009, 20:06
Gender: Male

Re: N. Lancs and Cumbria Branch recommend 'no'!

Post by postietaz »

so phantom are you telling us royal mail are gunna let these contrcts go, now we getting paid f8ck all to deliver them fooking wake up man ,someone already stated royal mail kiss goodbye to £40 million in d2d contracts .i assume because this is not a nationwide d2d only profitable areas that the customer wants so in a nutshell if you dont deliver d2d then no pound notes pay those that deliver .because if you think d2d are gunna dissapear you are so wrong :wave :wave
phantomshare
Posts: 252
Joined: 29 Jan 2007, 19:10

Re: N. Lancs and Cumbria Branch recommend 'no'!

Post by phantomshare »

D2D are not going to disappear, but RM's share is getting less and less.

wake up.

there are companies out there doing the same work.
postietaz
Posts: 271
Joined: 23 Sep 2009, 20:06
Gender: Male

Re: N. Lancs and Cumbria Branch recommend 'no'!

Post by postietaz »

do one adam crozier go fook the tv up
phantomshare
Posts: 252
Joined: 29 Jan 2007, 19:10

Re: N. Lancs and Cumbria Branch recommend 'no'!

Post by phantomshare »

very mature debate, don't like the truth?
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Re: N. Lancs and Cumbria Branch recommend 'no'!

Post by BELIAL »

phantomshare wrote:very mature debate, don't like the truth?
FFs you simpleton ,no business ever gives up it's most profitable line.We really are f****d if the majority are like you.Grow a brain cell and do the rest of us a favour
Bye
phantomshare
Posts: 252
Joined: 29 Jan 2007, 19:10

Re: N. Lancs and Cumbria Branch recommend 'no'!

Post by phantomshare »

do you not think RM will put them all in 1 envelope?

Could RM say there workload now there's no additional payment anymore?

Don't get personal knobhead.
phantomshare
Posts: 252
Joined: 29 Jan 2007, 19:10

Re: N. Lancs and Cumbria Branch recommend 'no'!

Post by phantomshare »

and it's not about them giving it up it's about it being taken away.
baldrick
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 5038
Joined: 13 Sep 2007, 23:37
Gender: Male

Re: N. Lancs and Cumbria Branch recommend 'no'!

Post by baldrick »

phantomshare wrote:do you not think RM will put them all in 1 envelope?
Could RM say there workload now there's no additional payment anymore?
I don't work in Deliveries, but as I understand it the companies who use D2D don't want them
in one wrapper as they will go straight in the bin.
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Re: N. Lancs and Cumbria Branch recommend 'no'!

Post by BELIAL »

phantomshare wrote:do you not think RM will put them all in 1 envelope?

Could RM say there workload now there's no additional payment anymore?

Don't get personal knobhead.
I stand fully corrected,head bowed and in abject regret of my unforgivable transgression :wink:
Bye
labbloke
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 282
Joined: 03 Sep 2009, 05:11
Gender: Male

Re: N. Lancs and Cumbria Branch recommend 'no'!

Post by labbloke »

I would personally like to thank our North Western brothers and sisters for their recommendation.

Some nasty people will say how dare they after CWU HQ raodshow.

But it shows that serious activists/reps have thought long and hard about the ramifications of the deal and how it seriously affects a significant portion of the workforce.

Bless you all. :Applause
mitzi
Posts: 130
Joined: 03 Jun 2007, 21:03
Gender: Male
Location: north west

Re: N. Lancs and Cumbria Branch recommend 'no'!

Post by mitzi »

Good show to delivery reps from NL&C. No doubt the self interested reps from distribution did not share your views.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72773
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: N. Lancs and Cumbria Branch recommend 'no'!

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

lovejoy wrote:
taxi4leighton wrote:does it really matter what various branches recommend?
we all have a brain in our head
and a vote in our pocket
me , im voting no
History shows it makes a huge difference. The likes of you and I will think / judge for ourselves but a very large % of members will go with branch recommendations. Previous agreements / elections support this.
Regrettably Lovejoy is right on this one - During the ballot for the last agreement I heard someone ask our Rep "What does the Branch recommend" He being truthful said "Yes to accept although ......" and the bloke asking interrupted and said "Thats good enough for me" and walked off :arrrghhh :arrrghhh
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
baldrick
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 5038
Joined: 13 Sep 2007, 23:37
Gender: Male

Re: N. Lancs and Cumbria Branch recommend 'no'!

Post by baldrick »

Yes it will probably go on Branch recommendations.
The people on this site are more aware of the arguments and details of the proposed agreement,
but most CWU members, unfortunately, will not read (or understand due to the terminology used)
the agreement in full, and will go on Branch/rep's advice - and the propaganda that will be coming
from both the CWU and RM.