£20.60 D2D supplement!!

[el_cartero]

3 months of VIP treatment by royal mail buttered them up so much - they forgot about who they was working for.

Wouldnt surprise me if RM has offered them some kind of payment to stop fighting for us.

[creedscat]

3 months of VIP treatment by royal mail buttered them up so much - they forgot about who they was working for.

Wouldnt surprise me if RM has offered them some kind of payment to stop fighting for us.

That my friend is possibly the most sensible post you have undertaken yet. For that i will let you do my D2D's for free.

Makes you wonder why the CWU agreed to call strikes of over the festive period eh?

[el_cartero]

AS FAR AS IM CONCERNED WE DONT EVEN NEED TO SEE THE RESULT IN VOTE.

THIS AGREEMENT IS A FARCE AND THEY SHOULD BE ASHAMED TO EVEN ASK US TO VOTE.

SUMONE EMAIL CWU AND ASK FOR STRIKES..

THAT WOULD PISS EM OFF :D

[k979aaa]

part timers are bullied underpaid - threatened abused forced on bad walks (that have been made to make FT walks easier) . mentally tortured .

Reps dont care about them.

And now the CWU is having a dig.

Same goes for full time but most of us are in the union for that is the only difference i see!.

Still waiting for your stats?

I am part time and in the union thankyou

And good on you for nearly all in our office on full time are in the union but part time is less than 10% at best for they invariably are the ones who come in work while we lose a days pay fighting for our rights the rights that part time staff not in the union so gladly accept while sticking two fingers up at us as we lose a days pay!.

[el_cartero]

do u wonder why we do not join - check your attitude towards us. we are allready the SHITE on yours and CWUs shoe.

YEHHHHHHHHHH WE WANT IN SOOOO MUCH.

boon

[BELIAL]

3 months of VIP treatment by royal mail buttered them up so much - they forgot about who they was working for.

Wouldnt surprise me if RM has offered them some kind of payment to stop fighting for us.

I bet Higson spiked the pies with rohypnol

[BlueEspresso]

Just passed the idea via a lawyer if pro-rata for the d2d, if as i've previously said they will be prepped for ptimers in frame then pro-rata is ok legally. If pt are expected to prep and deliver the same as ft then it is illegal as its workplace discrimination. thats would leave RM & CWU in a sticky mess i think.

[Himaggen]

Sorry if I've missed something within all of these pages, (too depressed to read through it all), but I'm trying to understand what makes anyone think that part-timers would be paid pro-rata for D.2.D.

Most P.T at out D.O do everything bar I.P.S, so why would they receive less D.2.D money as D.2.D aren't part of I.P.S!

Surely prep and delivery of D.2.D is the criteria for payment, not working hours.

[Ahebban]

I am an Office Rep where the Full-time/Part-time ratio is around 80%-20%. The bits and pieces that I have seen in respect to D2Ds on RMC make it difficult for me (or any Office Rep I should imagine) to sell the issue to anyone - be they full-time or part-time!

I have not seen the draft Agreement that was available earlier today, but it is difficult to see how a 'pro rata' payment for the delivery of D2D is viable and justified in respect to part-time staff. In my opinion, unlike pro-rata payments (I have the Christmas bonus in mind) where the link can be made to attendance over a given period of time, D2Ds are a different beast altogether and not comparable.

[BELIAL]

Sorry if I've missed something within all of these pages, (too depressed to read through it all), but I'm trying to understand what makes anyone think that part-timers would be paid pro-rata for D.2.D.

Most P.T at out D.O do everything bar I.P.S, so why would they receive less D.2.D money as D.2.D aren't part of I.P.S!

Surely prep and delivery of D.2.D is the criteria for payment, not working hours.

The bit where it said" pro rata" is what gave it away to me

[REDLETTER]

Just passed the idea via a lawyer if pro-rata for the d2d, if as i've previously said they will be prepped for ptimers in frame then pro-rata is ok legally. If pt are expected to prep and deliver the same as ft then it is illegal as its workplace discrimination. thats would leave RM & CWU in a sticky mess i think.

I like the sound of this.......... I will insist they are prepped into my frame at 20% per day including my day off so the cover can take his share!

[Himaggen]

what makes anyone think that part-timers would be paid pro-rata for D.2.D.

The bit where it said" pro rata" is what gave it away to me

That's exactly the reason I asked, surely the idea of the Negotiations etc. is to clarify things like this. I would guess that it was intended to cover those on shift patterns like the '6 days on 6 days off' (24 hour), or those on 4 or 5 hour days (delivery only). Surely the brilliant minds of the CWU who we've trusted to act for us over four months were able to see this and have made provision for it in the full document.

[fishtank]

Sorry if I've missed something within all of these pages, (too depressed to read through it all), but I'm trying to understand what makes anyone think that part-timers would be paid pro-rata for D.2.D.

Most P.T at out D.O do everything bar I.P.S, so why would they receive less D.2.D money as D.2.D aren't part of I.P.S!

Surely prep and delivery of D.2.D is the criteria for payment, not working hours.

The bit where it said" pro rata" is what gave it away to me

Don't forget the fact that it is a non-pensionable pro-rata supplement.

[el_cartero]

is that pro rata on all the forced overtime we do? or pro rata on the fake (under houred) contract they give us wen we walk in the door.

[HootyMacBoob]

Get rid of the pro rata and up the payment to £30 without including the shift allowances and the deal would look more reasonable.