ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

THE AGREEMENT

Download forum where important downloads and agreements are available.
Sci_Dog
Posts: 292
Joined: 04 Dec 2008, 15:53
Gender: Male
Location: Northern Ireland

Re: THE AGREEMENT

Post by Sci_Dog »

AndyK wrote:We would have public support if RM are not sticking to their side of the agreement, RM must return to negotiation at all levels or return to strikes, independently reviewed.

I disagree. The public do not care who is in the right or wrong. Or who hasn't stuck to what agreement. They just wanted it sorted and their post delivered. Now they have that, even if it is only agreed in the short term, you really think they are gonna support more strikes in the future? If so your living in cuckoo land mate. You really are. It's game over.
Sad as I am please do follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/purplemuffinman" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; Even just to check out my pic! LoL

You ever heard a millionaire say money is the root of all evil? Me either!
ExSG
Posts: 81
Joined: 17 Oct 2009, 18:59
Gender: Male

Re: THE AGREEMENT

Post by ExSG »

I sure do get pissed off with all the detracters on this site. Fair enough you have an opinion but the 'interim' agreement is only minutes old, none of you will have had the chance to get involved in local discussions yet.

As someone else said, if local managers - and they are invariably the problem - are still acting in the same way they have in the past then ITS YOU WHO SHOULD BE SUPPLYING THE UNION WITH CONCRETE AND WELL DOCUMENTED EXAMPLES. That way the fortnightly review will be meaningful and the PEC will have good evidence to back their complaints.
ulster postie
Posts: 503
Joined: 19 May 2007, 14:10
Location: N IRELAND

Re: THE AGREEMENT

Post by ulster postie »

In my humble opinion this is what R.M. wants, a split in the ranks, THIS IS ONLY THE FIRST OF MANY BATTLES. YOU CAN WIN OR LOSE PLENTY OF BATTLES BUT THAT MEANS NOUGHT IF YOU DONT WIN THE WAR. IF I AM PUT DOWN I WILL ALWAYS TRY AND GET UP AND GIVE MY FOE A BIGGER RESPONCE,AND COME AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN, UNTIL I HAVE EITHER WON OR BEEN DEFEATED.

WE HAV"NT GONE AWAY YOU KNOW

ONWARDS AND UPWARDS
opg town walk
postdoom
Posts: 55
Joined: 20 Oct 2007, 21:45

Re: THE AGREEMENT

Post by postdoom »

xXPostmanPatXx wrote:hopefully we wont ruion too many christmasses for the children
WTF :crazy:
spilie
Posts: 515
Joined: 28 Oct 2007, 21:48

Re: THE AGREEMENT

Post by spilie »

dvbuk55 wrote:What exactly is new here?

All the goodwill in the world will not resolve the issues in a weak office.

Talk, talk, talk, talk - the CWU have been bamboozled again, they sell us out cheaply for a couple of ham sandwiches and a few kind words.

Does anyone on this forum truly believe that Royal Mail have any intention whatsoever of stopping the tactics they have employed so successfully in the last 18 months?

Does anyone at the CWU understand what goes on at the sharp end? All those items: work patterns, D2D, measurement, etc have been supposedly up for discussion forever and that blase statement "in the meantime all national agreements will remain in place" - they aren't in place NOW, changes have been steamrollered in time after time - are they still to stand - the park and loop duties with 4hr 15 delivery spans are they agreed at National level? and if not will they be rescinded? Of course not.

This is nothing more than the 2007/2009 Pay and Modernisation Agreement revisited.

The CWU does not deserve the support of the rank and file membership and they will not get any more money from me to support their lavish gravy train lifestyle.
spot on what a pile of shi*e, commited to this genuine that fuc**g s**t about time a petition was started to remove all at the top table a vote of no confidence thats what i say
AndyK
Posts: 176
Joined: 08 Aug 2007, 18:55

Re: THE AGREEMENT

Post by AndyK »

I disagree. The public do not care who is in the right or wrong. Or who hasn't stuck to what agreement. They just wanted it sorted and their post delivered. Now they have that, even if it is only agreed in the short term, you really think they are gonna support more strikes in the future? If so your living in cuckoo land mate. You really are. It's game over.
Only the opinion of the main share holder the government really matters and if RM bugger around with the agreement then the government must step in. yours cuckoo land
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: THE AGREEMENT

Post by Big Daz »

postdoom wrote:
xXPostmanPatXx wrote:hopefully we wont ruion too many christmasses for the children
WTF :crazy:

I thought Santa deliverd the presents not Royal Mail? :hmmmm
chelmsfordpostie
Posts: 41
Joined: 18 May 2007, 18:06

Re: THE AGREEMENT

Post by chelmsfordpostie »

Its time for a reality check people. From where we were with Royal Mail refusing to go back and revisit the imposed revisions to where we are now is a massive climb down. What was it Higson said 'no going back on mdernisation' , well he just hasgone back with every office now having the chance to re-negoitiate their impose revisions. Plus there is an end to people being taken off pay and at last a final admission of Royal mails ignoring of the reward part of the pay and modernisation. If Royal Mail dont't live up to their promises the strikes are back on. So to me for once our headquarters have come up with an acceptable agreement , what we need to see now is if royal Mail live up to their promises.
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: THE AGREEMENT

Post by Big Daz »

It is the attitude and actions of RM over the next few weeks that will determine if our issues finally get resolved.

The only issue I can see is whether or not the action should have continued untill everything was settled in full, rather than suspened once were were back on track and heading in the right direction.


The actions to be taken as laid in the interim agreement are fine to me, but the question for each and every member is, are they happy for the strikes to be suspended whilst those actions take place?
torapeach
Posts: 37
Joined: 03 Aug 2009, 15:19
Gender: Male

Re: THE AGREEMENT

Post by torapeach »

Sci_Dog wrote:Can anyone post any of the positives that have come from this agreement?
It was written on recycled paper :whistle :whistle :whistle :silenced
kwikpost
Posts: 378
Joined: 19 Jan 2007, 16:23

Re: THE AGREEMENT

Post by kwikpost »

Big Daz wrote:It is the attitude and actions of RM over the next few weeks that will determine if our issues finally get resolved.

The only issue I can see is whether or not the action should have continued untill everything was settled in full, rather than suspened once were were back on track and heading in the right direction.


The actions to be taken as laid in the interim agreement are fine to me, but the question for each and every member is, are they happy for the strikes to be suspended whilst those actions take place?
this will hurt the union badly. they have failed the memebers of this union and the memeber's won't forget.
visigoth
Posts: 105
Joined: 22 Oct 2009, 00:07
Gender: Male

Re: THE AGREEMENT

Post by visigoth »

Big Daz wrote:It is the attitude and actions of RM over the next few weeks that will determine if our issues finally get resolved.

The only issue I can see is whether or not the action should have continued untill everything was settled in full, rather than suspened once were were back on track and heading in the right direction.


The actions to be taken as laid in the interim agreement are fine to me, but the question for each and every member is, are they happy for the strikes to be suspended whilst those actions take place?
Quite a while since I've held any kind of office. However, unless things have changed drastically I think you'll find that the final say on when (and even if) a "Yes" vote is implemented rests with the EC.

:shock: I know, but twas ever thus & may even still be.
G O Root
Posts: 135
Joined: 18 Oct 2009, 18:38
Gender: Male

Re: THE AGREEMENT

Post by G O Root »

Big Daz wrote:It is the attitude and actions of RM over the next few weeks that will determine if our issues finally get resolved.

The only issue I can see is whether or not the action should have continued untill everything was settled in full, rather than suspened once were were back on track and heading in the right direction.


The actions to be taken as laid in the interim agreement are fine to me, but the question for each and every member is, are they happy for the strikes to be suspended whilst those actions take place?
I completely agree Daz. We should have kept the stikes on , to keep the pressure on. If things break down, who's going to come out on strike in the lead up to Christmas, particularly now as the union , in the eyes of many have rolled over. We need the public on our side , but if we went on strike just before Xmas there would be uproar. Unfortunately Xmas does hold huge bargaining power, but also could lose the public forever if we went on strike again.
Lincox
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 3485
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 18:07
Gender: Male

Re: THE AGREEMENT

Post by Lincox »

I think the most serious point is that they state that their is to be no future disruption to the service we give the customer. Am I being paranoid or have they given away our right to strike in the future?
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: THE AGREEMENT

Post by Big Daz »

visigoth wrote:
Big Daz wrote:It is the attitude and actions of RM over the next few weeks that will determine if our issues finally get resolved.

The only issue I can see is whether or not the action should have continued untill everything was settled in full, rather than suspened once were were back on track and heading in the right direction.


The actions to be taken as laid in the interim agreement are fine to me, but the question for each and every member is, are they happy for the strikes to be suspended whilst those actions take place?
Quite a while since I've held any kind of office. However, unless things have changed drastically I think you'll find that the final say on when (and even if) a "Yes" vote is implemented rests with the EC.

:shock: I know, but twas ever thus & may even still be.

Any better?

It is the attitude and actions of RM over the next few weeks that will determine if our issues finally get resolved to the point where we have a final agreement on the table that the membership vote yes to.