ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Interesting Statistics

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
PrestwickPostie
Posts: 208
Joined: 29 Sep 2007, 12:33

Re: Interesting Statistics

Post by PrestwickPostie »

stokes11eg wrote::crazy: There is a saying--stastistics--stastistics and more damned lies!
a man in red once said "stastics are like mini skirts, they don't always show the full picture" whilst refering to Arild Stavrum :hmmmm
Adam Crozier is Peter Mandelson's rent boy
Glenno
Posts: 1491
Joined: 05 Jun 2007, 13:12

Re: Interesting Statistics

Post by Glenno »

Blowing Away The 10% Traffic Volume Myth

Have a look at these stats and use them in any WTLL or discussions you may have with any doubters.

In their submission to the Hooper report Royal Mail claimed they had 229,000 employees in 2002. By the same measure, this had fallen to 178,430 in 2009. This is a loss of over 50,000 and constitutes a 22% decline.

In its 2002 annual report and accounts Royal Mail reported it was delivering 81m letters a day. In its 2009 Report and Accounts it said it was delivering 75 million letters a day. This is a decline of 7.4%.

So in the last 7 years staffing levels have fallen 22% while the number of items Royal Mail reports it delivers every day has fallen by only 7.4%

RM constantly claim a 10% drop in Mail. Yet their own figures, state that it's only dropped by 9 Million items, in the last 4 years!

The mail level claim for 2008/2009 is 75 million items to 28 million addresses and for 2004/2005 around 84 million items of mail to 27 million addresses.

9 million less items of mail

1 million more delivery points

Royal Mail Letters 2008/2009 162,310 employees(amended from above)
If mail drops 10% this year then at the end of March 2010 we will be on 67.5 million items a day IF YOU BELIEVE ROYAL MAIL but with how many employees?????



Click on this link ftp://ftp.royalmail.com/Downloads/publi" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... y_2009.pdf and have a look at the detailed group breakdown on head count
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: Interesting Statistics

Post by Big Daz »

The relevance of overall group headcount is limited in relation to RMl workload. It is important we concentrate on RML workload so our argument is then water tight.

However it is worth looking at the headcount for those who are employed by group and not one of the four main sections (RML, POL, PF and GLS)

It would be interesting to look at mail volumes compared to 1 year 2 years 3 years ago etc etc and see where volumes go up and down.
Glenno
Posts: 1491
Joined: 05 Jun 2007, 13:12

Re: Interesting Statistics

Post by Glenno »

Spotted that in 2002 items per day was 81million
in 2004/05 it was 84million (intro of SDD)
in 2008/09 it was 75million

also that the number of employees originally stated 178,430
then amended to 162,310 = 16,120 = a massive 29% fall since 2002 66,700 job losses since 2002 thats if my maths are correct of course
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Interesting Statistics

Post by fishtank »

Its not the accuracy of statistics that makes them true.

Its all in the repetition.

10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10%.........
good times, bad times you know I've had my share