Just four posts since joining two years ago in 2007...?Sandra D wrote:I agree with Ethilfrog that it is more 50/50 on yes / no (though bear in mind that not all who didn't vote would have said no, but it is fair to think that probably most would have meaning at least a 40-45% 'no' I'd say).Ethilfrog wrote:OK, we've had enough euphoria. Let's examine the reality. Rough figures to make the point plain:
60K in favour.
20K against.
40K didn't vote.
Add in all the people who aren't members of the union (please don't think their views don't matter, because when it comes to taking part in IA they definitely do) and we have a MINORITY who are definitely 'yes'. The rest are lukewarm at best.
An ambiguous result. What a disaster.
Deep down, and judging by their attitudes today, Hayes and Ward know this.
However, I am baffled why this is good. Perhaps things are talked about differently in the vast majority of units, but my understanding is this is awful news. Clearly I'm in the minority based on the vote alone, but I don't understand why. Not looked to make an argument, but I know a good few people in various other companies who have been made redundant and another person with a pay freeze and even one with a pay cut forced.
We haven't faced any of this (unless I'm wrong and some have), so I view us as exceptionally fortunate compared to a considerable number of others out there. ALL companies are/have been struggling after all.
I just don't see how really pissing of the country will do anything to aid us and don't even see the need to do so when so many other friends/people are in FAR worse situations with their jobs. Quite frankly it makes me ashamed and embarrassed to talk to people facing real serious issues with their work life and employers.
I'm sure to elect some hatred for this post, but I don't mean any negativity to those here or who voted yes, I just genuinely don't see how it is a good thing. Just an understanding issue, not a hatred one!
Were they all so negative?
Do I spy a ringer?