ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

It's a YES!

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
LouBarlow
Posts: 4709
Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 18:56

It's a YES!

Post by LouBarlow »

...according to the Guardian

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/oct/0 ... royal-mail" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Looks like we will all be out by the end of the month then.
krussel
Posts: 5300
Joined: 26 Jan 2009, 18:03
Gender: Male
Location: Out on the streets.

Re: It's a YES!

Post by krussel »

Only expected at the moment ! Come on, come on :pray :pray :pray :pray :pray
Rows of houses all bearing down on me........I can feel their blue hands touching me.......All these things in all positions.........All these things will one day take control..........
tailfly12
Posts: 199
Joined: 30 Jun 2009, 12:09
Gender: Male

Re: It's a YES!

Post by tailfly12 »

Happy Days are hear again. Crozier OUT.
RobertT
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 6708
Joined: 09 Sep 2007, 14:26
Gender: Male

Re: It's a YES!

Post by RobertT »

Nothing's confirmed yet! :silenced
Links to all RM pension related websites are here
LouBarlow
Posts: 4709
Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 18:56

Re: It's a YES!

Post by LouBarlow »

The Guardian are never wrong......ahem.
london sub
Posts: 397
Joined: 29 Jan 2009, 16:24
Gender: Male

Re: It's a YES!

Post by london sub »

Its just speculation, but its the media just wanting something to write about, but i think (hope) it will be a yes!
stokes11eg
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 3077
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 12:51
Gender: Female

Re: It's a YES!

Post by stokes11eg »

:sad: Should be pleased--but still feel our illustrious union leaders will somehow deflect from this course of action.
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Re: It's a YES!

Post by DGP1 »

stokes11eg wrote::sad: Should be pleased--but still feel our illustrious union leaders will somehow deflect from this course of action.
They'd better not Image
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
krussel
Posts: 5300
Joined: 26 Jan 2009, 18:03
Gender: Male
Location: Out on the streets.

Re: It's a YES!

Post by krussel »

disgruntledpostie1 wrote:
stokes11eg wrote::sad: Should be pleased--but still feel our illustrious union leaders will somehow deflect from this course of action.
They'd better not Image
Argh gross i am just about to sit down and eat my dinner :confused
Rows of houses all bearing down on me........I can feel their blue hands touching me.......All these things in all positions.........All these things will one day take control..........
kwikpost
Posts: 378
Joined: 19 Jan 2007, 16:23

Re: It's a YES!

Post by kwikpost »

stokes11eg wrote::sad: Should be pleased--but still feel our illustrious union leaders will somehow deflect from this course of action.
if they do then it's the end of the gravy train for them. there's already a lot of anger at our union in london.
chunk
Posts: 957
Joined: 29 Jul 2009, 20:21
Gender: Male

Re: It's a YES!

Post by chunk »

If and when we go out,
at no point will i be whooping it up.
I am committed to strike action but view it like a trip to the dentist ( possibly painful but necessary)!
I understand though that a lot of us are impatient for change.
I'm a postman-and i know where you live.....
Lounge Lizard
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 9458
Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54

Re: It's a YES!

Post by Lounge Lizard »

"The Communication Workers Union is expected to announce on Thursday that 120,000 of its members at the Royal Mail will back a national strike following months of regional stoppages."
120,000 of its members - so that's 120,000 out of how many of its members at Royal Mail ? :shock:
And "expected to announce" - that, without any further explanation, is about as newsworthy as 'the tories are Expected to win the next general election. :shock:
And I always thought the Guardian was a quality paper. :sad:
jcjd
Posts: 99
Joined: 24 Jun 2007, 17:48
Location: London

Re: It's a YES!

Post by jcjd »

Looks like we will all be out by the end of the month then.

about time the calvery arrived :nana :nana :nana , i was out last week and the week before and the week before that ect... oh and were out again on saturday and again next wednesday if the CWU don't anounce strike dates next week, and we'll keep on striking while theirs still one of us left standing in london WE WLL WIN
London Postman
prowler
Posts: 222
Joined: 01 Jul 2007, 10:36

Re: It's a YES!

Post by prowler »

No doubt it will be a YES. I'm more interested in how many will not bother to vote, and so will Royal Mail. They will take that as a NO. I'd like to see a 70% return and an 80% YES vote to rubber stamp it. And how long is this government going to take a back seat? Could be difficult times ahead. :hmmmm
Carnoustie
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 793
Joined: 31 Jan 2007, 22:00

Re: It's a YES!

Post by Carnoustie »

Lounge Lizard wrote:"The Communication Workers Union is expected to announce on Thursday that 120,000 of its members at the Royal Mail will back a national strike following months of regional stoppages."
120,000 of its members - so that's 120,000 out of how many of its members at Royal Mail ? :shock:
And "expected to announce" - that, without any further explanation, is about as newsworthy as 'the tories are Expected to win the next general election. :shock:
And I always thought the Guardian was a quality paper. :sad:
Bloody journalists. No hard facts, just (bone) idle speculation. Why don't they just report the facts, when the ballot result comes out in a couple of days time :mad

That 120,000 figure is probably lifted from an outdated TOTAL EMPLOYEES figure from one of their own newspaper's articles from several years ago.

Even when we have achieved an overwhelming Yes vote in the past, there's usually about 40% of members that don't even bother to vote :d'oh! So, even in an 'overwhelming' vote in favour of a strike, the total number of Yes votes would never come to anything like the 120,000 figure they've plucked out of thin air to scare their readers.

Well-researched journalism ? Nah, guesswork that you or me could easily base an article on. For example, the sentence
The union will have to give seven days' notice of any national strikes, raising the threat of action before the end of the month

WOW! I never would have worked out in a million years that 8th October + 7 days = strikes sometime after the middle of the month. No wonder these guys are so highly paid :roll: