ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Dog bit Wirral postman because of phobia of fluorescents

Latest Royal Mail and CWU news.This is an open forum.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72604
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Dog bit Wirral postman because of phobia of fluorescents

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Dog bit Wirral postman because of phobia of fluorescent jackets, court told

http://www.wirralnews.co.uk/wirral-news ... -24585234/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

A DOG which bit a postman escaped a death penalty when a court heard he has a phobia of fluorescent jackets.

But Dean Roberts, the owner of springer spaniel Floyd, was told his pet could be put down if its actions mean it appears before the courts again.

Wirral magistrates court yesterday heard the 38-year-old, of Poole Road, Egremont, took the dog into King Street post office on February 10 where, without warning, it bit postman Ed Williams, who was delivering mail.

Roberts told the court he had rescued Floyd after it was abused, getting permission to care for him from the authorities.

He said he suspected the person who ill-treated the dog may have been a workman, because he always reacted badly to anyone in an orange fluorescent jacket – which Mr Williams was wearing.

Sue Foster, prosecuting on behalf of Wirral council, said: “He told the owner his dog should be under control and the man was very apologetic, explaining he was a rescue dog and he had an issue with glowing fluorescent jackets.”

Roberts admitted not having his dog under control, but the court heard he had already complied with the terms of the dog control order by keeping Floyd on a lead and with a muzzle on at all times in public.

He was also ordered to pay £90 court costs.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Lounge Lizard
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 9458
Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54

Re: Dog bit Wirral postman because of phobia of fluorescents

Post by Lounge Lizard »

And the magistrates forgot to point out that dogs are colour blind. :shock:
baldrick
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 5038
Joined: 13 Sep 2007, 23:37
Gender: Male

Re: Dog bit Wirral postman because of phobia of fluorescents

Post by baldrick »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote: the man was very apologetic, explaining he was a rescue dog and he had an issue with glowing fluorescent jackets.”
Most emergency/rescue workers would wear fluorescent jackets, I hope the dog doesn't attack them too.
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Re: Dog bit Wirral postman because of phobia of fluorescents

Post by DGP1 »

baldrick wrote:
TrueBlueTerrier wrote: the man was very apologetic, explaining he was a rescue dog and he had an issue with glowing fluorescent jackets.”
Most emergency/rescue workers would wear fluorescent jackets, I hope the dog doesn't attack them too.
Nearly everyone seems to wear them these days, ever our managers have them (special ones with manager printed on the back :silenced ) even though they spend most of their time in their office.
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
CourtneyCox
Posts: 35
Joined: 20 Jan 2008, 05:25
Gender: Female

Re: Dog bit Wirral postman because of phobia of fluorescents

Post by CourtneyCox »

disgruntledpostie1 wrote:
baldrick wrote:
TrueBlueTerrier wrote: the man was very apologetic, explaining he was a rescue dog and he had an issue with glowing fluorescent jackets.”
Most emergency/rescue workers would wear fluorescent jackets, I hope the dog doesn't attack them too.
Nearly everyone seems to wear them these days, ever our managers have them (special ones with manager printed on the back :silenced ) even though they spend most of their time in their office.
Apparently they are meant to wear them in the vehicle bays or vehicle movement areas, or when there is an incident or fire practice so that they can be easily identified, not by the coroner though.
shadow
Posts: 494
Joined: 02 Jun 2009, 18:17
Gender: Female

Re: Dog bit Wirral postman because of phobia of fluorescents

Post by shadow »

What next, my dog mauled the child because he has a fear of children. Thats okay then.NOT.
Wessex
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1267
Joined: 10 Jul 2007, 17:20

Re: Dog bit Wirral postman because of phobia of fluorescents

Post by Wessex »

When I lived abroad it was the custom there for most dogs to be muzzled in public,certainly the German Shepherd type of dogs and other breeds used for guarding purposes always seemed to wear a cage over their muzzles in public.In rural areas all letterboxes were on the outside of gates
shadow
Posts: 494
Joined: 02 Jun 2009, 18:17
Gender: Female

Re: Dog bit Wirral postman because of phobia of fluorescents

Post by shadow »

Wessex wrote:When I lived abroad it was the custom there for most dogs to be muzzled in public,certainly the German Shepherd type of dogs and other breeds used for guarding purposes always seemed to wear a cage over their muzzles in public.In rural areas all letterboxes were on the outside of gates
I find the little muts are worse than the big dogs.
pickaname
Posts: 1467
Joined: 11 Sep 2007, 20:24

Re: Dog bit Wirral postman because of phobia of fluorescents

Post by pickaname »

Ive always thought these hi vis jackets should be banned.

Ok in the office in dangerous areas perhaps, but out on delivery dogs definitely are sensitive to them believe me.

Ive always thought we wear them so snooping managers can see you more easily.
andy2007
Posts: 3971
Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 10:16
Gender: Male
Location: Earth

Re: Dog bit Wirral postman because of phobia of fluorescents

Post by andy2007 »

So let me see if I understand this correctly: The owner had complied with the Law, by keeping the dog muzzled, and on a lead in Public. Is that right? :shock: :evil/mad

Because if so: The Law needs to be changed NOW! Because he knew BEFORE the attack, that the Dog had a phobia of people wearing Hi-Viz. And was thought to have been abused by someone who wears them. But didn't think to keep the Dog locked in the House, or Muzzled, whenever it was in the Garden!

As far as I'm concerned, that's gross negligence! And I sincerely hope that the injured Postie sues him for everything he has now, or ever will have. Hit him in the pocket, where it'll hurt the irrisponsible b*****d! :evil/mad :arrrghhh :evil/mad :evil/mad
Don't knock Insanity
it's just another outlook on Reality!