I just read this article on the BBC Website:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7736794.stm and had very mixed feelings about it. I found Nick Griffin's statement that he would use the Human Rights Act, to deal with the situation, hillarious! The BNP oppose that Act, yet he wants to use it!

So it's ok for them to have rights, but not anyone else, eh?
Having said that. I'm disgusted that contact details were included in the list. I wouldn't want my details to be put up on the Web, and I fully support their attempts to have something done about that.

But putting their names, and ocupations in the Public Domain, is in the Public interests. So in a way, it's good that this happened. Particularly as some of them are in jobs, where they are banned from joining.
I've no problem with letting people know what my Political beliefs are. So why are the ashamed of being BNP Members?
I particularly liked this bit:
While there is no ban on many of those professions joining the BNP, its right-wing political stance and whites-only membership policy are seen by many as incompatible with frontline public service.
Police officers, on the other hand, are formally banned from joining, a policy which is recognised in the list.
Alongside the name of a serving officer, the document states that there is "Discretion required re. employment concerns".
I also hope for Nick's sake, that he can back up his claim that it's all a Labour conspiracy. Or he's likley to get sued for a lot of money.
Still, at least he's
trying to protect the ones who should loose their jobs:
Mr Griffin earlier said the list was "essentially genuine", but a number of names of people who were not or are not party members had been added.
Yeh, right!
