ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Double Deckers

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
Stormproof
Posts: 6116
Joined: 07 Jul 2007, 21:03
Gender: Female

Double Deckers

Post by Stormproof »

They are in the process of building an extension to the ramp at my office and today they were fitting what looked like hydraulic platforms, are these for the double decker artics I keep hearing about?
So keep on moving, moving, moving your feet
Keep on shuf-shuf-shuffling to this ghost dance beat
Just keep on walking down never ending streets


Illegitimi non carborundum
Hedge
Posts: 27
Joined: 26 Sep 2008, 16:55
Gender: Male

Double Deckers

Post by Hedge »

k66yla wrote:They are in the process of building an extension to the ramp at my office and today they were fitting what looked like hydraulic platforms, are these for the double decker artics I keep hearing about?
I dont think double deckers are any higher for offloading. they have internal lifts inside the actual artic.

The extensions on the ramps are probably just to make it more effective for loading and unloading.

i might be wrong though, without seeing what you mean then i dont really know :)
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Double Deckers

Post by DGP1 »

The lorries have a tailgate that goes up the the top deck, so there would be no reason for to adapt any loading ramp (unless it's to create space at the top for the lorry to fit :hmmmm but you'd assume they just cut a hole in the roof).

Image
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
Hedge
Posts: 27
Joined: 26 Sep 2008, 16:55
Gender: Male

Double Deckers

Post by Hedge »

Good to see I was right on that point :)

loaded and offloaded enough of them in the past
baldrick
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 5038
Joined: 13 Sep 2007, 23:37
Gender: Male

Double Deckers

Post by baldrick »

k66yla wrote:They are in the process of building an extension to the ramp at my office and today they were fitting what looked like hydraulic platforms, are these for the double decker artics I keep hearing about?
We have those on the loading bays at Mount Pleasant. They are used to extend into the artics,
both single and double decker. The top deck of the double decker does come down, but not right
down to the level of the loading bay.
Apparently RM have bought even bigger double deckers, but have now found they may not be able
to use them in London due to height restrictions in underpasses.
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Double Deckers

Post by DGP1 »

baldrick wrote:
k66yla wrote:They are in the process of building an extension to the ramp at my office and today they were fitting what looked like hydraulic platforms, are these for the double decker artics I keep hearing about?
We have those on the loading bays at Mount Pleasant. They are used to extend into the artics,
both single and double decker. The top deck of the double decker does come down, but not right
down to the level of the loading bay.
Apparently RM have bought even bigger double deckers, but have now found they may not be able
to use them in London due to height restrictions in underpasses
.
:chuckle :chuckle :chuckle :chuckle :chuckle
It doesn't surprise me that they don't do their homework properly. :d'oh!
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
axeman
Posts: 1733
Joined: 12 Jun 2007, 17:57

Double Deckers

Post by axeman »

Seems they had a better and quicker way to adapt the roof at Cardiff :left:
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Double Deckers

Post by BELIAL »

Get on board,get on board
Bye
darth
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 385
Joined: 20 Jan 2007, 15:00
Gender: Male

Double Deckers

Post by darth »

royal mails answer to the problem will be to lower the roads.
bogstandard
Posts: 1074
Joined: 08 Nov 2007, 06:16

Double Deckers

Post by bogstandard »

baldrick wrote: Apparently RM have bought even bigger double deckers, but have now found they may not be able
to use them in London due to height restrictions in underpasses.
LMFAO
what a gang of effing retards
They take the biscuit, they really do !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Would have loved to sit in on that meeting

A.C.
"right you lot i want the biggest, massivest lorry you can get"

The entire board speaks in harmony
" Yes Adam"

100's of thousands of £'s later........................................

The board tells Adam
" got them Adam "

A.C.
" don't tell me we have them, tell me we've been using them"

A couple of weeks later

A member of the board speaks
" Adam, you know those big big lorries we bought"

A.C.
"Yes"

member of the board
" bridges Adam, they don't fit through the bridges"

A.C.
" well you've F*cked up haven't you"

board member
" Adam ? "

A.C.
" look i'm an ideas man, i have ideas.
It's what i do, ok.
Your job is to make my ideas a reality, and you clearly haven't done that, so you've f*cked up, got it.
Look don't worry too much i'll show you how to fiddle the books later ok."

Board member
" Adam ? "

A.C.
" used to do it all the while when i was on the papers. Only got caught once too "

:dance :dance :dance
Confused... You won't be, after the next episode of. SOAP
pinstripe
Posts: 2469
Joined: 25 May 2007, 16:42
Gender: Male
Location: 2 left turns from reality

Double Deckers

Post by pinstripe »

I heard from my union rep that RM do not have the correct operator's licence to use them.
smudger54
Posts: 59
Joined: 05 Oct 2007, 00:03

Double Deckers

Post by smudger54 »

I pull these all week. The DD trailers are 2 types a 75 and the new 92 york versions, the 92 is 16ft tall takes 45 top deck and 47 bottom deck straight through compared to the 15 swan neck and 30 top and bottom deck. Some bays in some depots will not take the 92 DD's as they are low by 1ft. They dont require a different licence just the 92 needs a 44ton rated unit to pull it whereas the 75 only needs a 38ton unit. Loading times are 40-50 mins as heavy yorks such as trays must remain on the bottom deck. Hope this helps guys
Network Driver;nights.
paul_skinback
Posts: 172
Joined: 18 Sep 2008, 20:40
Gender: Male

Double Deckers

Post by paul_skinback »

Get on board! Get on board!
Come and join the Double Deckers.
Take a letter for a journey,
On our double decker postie truck.
Ring the bell (ding! ding!),
Toot the horn (honk! honk!),
When you ride with the Double Deckers.
Fun and laughter is what we're after,
On our double double double postie truck.

You're aboard! You're aboard!
You're aboard with the Double Deckers.
Fun and laughter is what we're after,
On our double double double postie truck.
La la la! La la la!
La la la la la la la la.
La la la la la la la la,
On our double decker London bus. :nana

TURNDA SPEAKERS ON http://video.google.co.uk/videosearch?h ... 0&ct=title#


:nana :nana :nana :nana :nana :nana :nana :nana :dance :dance :dance :dance :dance :dance :dance
"I once asked a girl if she was an undertaker cos i had a stiff that needed seeing too"

" I once went into a watch menders, slapped me knob on the desk and said can you put a couple of hands on that?"
pinstripe
Posts: 2469
Joined: 25 May 2007, 16:42
Gender: Male
Location: 2 left turns from reality

Double Deckers

Post by pinstripe »

I was wondering about that. Some delivery offices have enough problems getting van in and out. I know that the lorry drivers can turn them on a sixpence but I honestly can't see them getting past the gates in my office. The 7.5 ton lorries have enough trouble at the moment.
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Double Deckers

Post by Big Daz »

Double deckers will be fine for the super duper shiny new regional mail centres.