Managers Sh!t revelation 4.5 hr delivery span

Tman · Post by **Tman** » 16 Oct 2008, 10:12

Well spotted Tman thats a huge + for you!

So giving (for example) a realistic overview of current trends in mail volumes makes me the anti-Christ, but criticising some irrelevant DOM's grammar gets me rounds of applause?

Shallow or what.....

norbert · Post by **norbert** » 16 Oct 2008, 12:00

axeman wrote:Yes for once you could be right teaman the managers are at that level aren't they

Who took the RM presentation course ? , that well known Sensible Eating , Croquet and Wild West Enthusiast ; Two Shags , ex Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott ? - the one that took on the English Language and the English language lost !

I agree the lightbulb has lit up in the DIM's braincell - all the requisite buzzwords from the Royal Mail ticklist to impress ?

There's a grammar and spelling suggestions in the Microsoft Word Menu - it will probably suggest commas , sentence structure , punctuation etc - Royal Fail use Lotus - that's a IBM version of MS Office ? - similar to Open Office etc - it's not hard to use

Think he'll have to be sent on the RM Fischer Price - " My First Computer " course

If this was shown in a Tribunal or Court Room , people are hardly going to be impressed - can't have people in authority thinking RM are run by amateurs

, there was a case when the Judge said " Which illiterate moron wrote this ? " - ATOS paperwork is riddled with errors and mistakes too .

Post by **POSTMAN** » 16 Oct 2008, 15:49

Tman wrote:
Well spotted Tman thats a huge + for you!

So giving (for example) a realistic overview of current trends in mail volumes makes me the anti-Christ, but criticising some irrelevant DOM's grammar gets me rounds of applause?

Shallow or what.....

Yeah,and your point is........................

brothermagrew · Post by **brothermagrew** » 16 Oct 2008, 16:48

POSTMAN wrote:
Tman wrote:
Well spotted Tman thats a huge + for you!

So giving (for example) a realistic overview of current trends in mail volumes makes me the anti-Christ, but criticising some irrelevant DOM's grammar gets me rounds of applause?

Shallow or what.....
Yeah,and your point is........................

Think what the point the brothers are saying is that you can't be wrong all of the time and that they have to give you credit when you are most probably right in this instance

Spedley · Post by **Spedley** » 16 Oct 2008, 17:45

I still don't care how long my delivery span is, I'll shovel s**t for 6 hours per day if they want me to but after 6 hours I go home.

Post by **dvbuk55** » 16 Oct 2008, 17:49

Well this is merely the pre cursor to park and loop where I was trying to find any info - events have however overtaken me somewhat because we are starting park and loop a week on Monday and the union have agreed in principle to all the changes to come about. I am not against park and loop BUT I would like to have seen a little bit more involvement by the cwu reps and more thought put in to the planning. There have been changes made to the original proposals which removes in part at least the "add ons" to an already 3.5 hour delivery. The reasoning behind the union agreement is that the extra work is not continuous with a walking delivery and so it is not counted in the delivery span and yet both operatives will be doing 3.5 hour walking deliveries plus all the packets for those duties and the specials and the parcels which would normally have been part of a van duty.

Can't wait for the 2009/2010 pay and modernisation agreement.

pickaname · Post by **pickaname** » 17 Oct 2008, 14:15

Who cares. Let them get on with it and cut off when you reach 14:18 or whenever you shift ends.

They cant force you to do overtime.

k979aaa · Post by **k979aaa** » 17 Oct 2008, 16:55

dvbuk55 wrote:Well this is merely the pre cursor to park and loop where I was trying to find any info - events have however overtaken me somewhat because we are starting park and loop a week on Monday and the union have agreed in principle to all the changes to come about. I am not against park and loop BUT I would like to have seen a little bit more involvement by the cwu reps and more thought put in to the planning. There have been changes made to the original proposals which removes in part at least the "add ons" to an already 3.5 hour delivery. The reasoning behind the union agreement is that the extra work is not continuous with a walking delivery and so it is not counted in the delivery span and yet both operatives will be doing 3.5 hour walking deliveries plus all the packets for those duties and the specials and the parcels which would normally have been part of a van duty.

Can't wait for the 2009/2010 pay and modernisation agreement.

Who does the firms that the drivers did and not forgeting the collection's?. Also don't forget your van check's and if you have to return to the office to relieve yourself's since the vans do not yet have toilet's in them so be it!. And no two peoples bladder's are the same are they!.

Phantom · Post by **Phantom** » 17 Oct 2008, 17:04

Tman wrote:So giving (for example) a realistic overview of current trends in mail volumes

So what trends are they then? don't say decreasing mail volumes cos that would be a lie wouldn't it.

Tman · Post by **Tman** » 17 Oct 2008, 17:16

Catch up Yorkie, that one's been beaten to death several times over

Phantom · Post by **Phantom** » 18 Oct 2008, 11:37

Tman wrote:Catch up Yorkie, that one's been beaten to death several times over

I know, I started it!

As for catch up, I'm way in front of ya me old,

Post by **TrueBlueTerrier** » 18 Oct 2008, 12:23

Phantom wrote:
Tman wrote:So giving (for example) a realistic overview of current trends in mail volumes
So what trends are they then? don't say decreasing mail volumes cos that would be a lie wouldn't it.

Light blue touch paper and retire.

Tman · Post by **Tman** » 18 Oct 2008, 17:13

More of a damp squib TBT.
The evidence is there for all to see ( "hidden agenda, FFS," eh?) but there's none so blind.....

axeman · Post by **axeman** » 18 Oct 2008, 18:09

Tman wrote:Catch up Yorkie, that one's been beaten to death several times over

And the same answer came from yeaman oops!!! sorry 'teaman' who's every inch down to his boots a royal fail wanabe

BELIAL · Post by **BELIAL** » 18 Oct 2008, 18:20

Whats a Wababe?