ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
chickenwittle
Posts: 2084
Joined: 15 Nov 2009, 09:43
Gender: Male

Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.

Post by chickenwittle »

Acca Dacca wrote:
22 Oct 2025, 22:35
tramssirhc wrote:
22 Oct 2025, 19:14
chickenwittle wrote:
22 Oct 2025, 16:28
He’s basically said the CWU will not agree to what Royal Mail want to push through and the usual suspects find a problem with it .💁
Boulch really didn't.
Yes he did. He explicitly said the union will not agree to the failed ODM that Royal Mail want.
It’s crazy some of the lengths these posters will go to slaughter the CWU , it’s irrelevant to them whether the CWU agree or disagree with the ODM because it will get the same negative reaction, the same posters have been doing it year on year . It actually makes you wonder if they are Royal Mail plants actively trying to destabilise the union because the amount of time and effort they put in isn’t normal.
chickenwittle
Posts: 2084
Joined: 15 Nov 2009, 09:43
Gender: Male

Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.

Post by chickenwittle »

SMS1969 wrote:
22 Oct 2025, 17:34
chickenwittle wrote:
22 Oct 2025, 16:28
He’s basically said the CWU will not agree to what Royal Mail want to push through and the usual suspects find a problem with it .💁
What if they push things through by executive action, like the poor new contracts?
I’m not saying Royal Mail won’t attempt to do that after Xmas , I’m simply explaining what is being said in that update.
tramssirhc
Posts: 1640
Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
Gender: Male

Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.

Post by tramssirhc »

chickenwittle wrote:
23 Oct 2025, 08:29
Acca Dacca wrote:
22 Oct 2025, 22:35
tramssirhc wrote:
22 Oct 2025, 19:14
chickenwittle wrote:
22 Oct 2025, 16:28
He’s basically said the CWU will not agree to what Royal Mail want to push through and the usual suspects find a problem with it .💁
Boulch really didn't.
Yes he did. He explicitly said the union will not agree to the failed ODM that Royal Mail want.
It’s crazy some of the lengths these posters will go to slaughter the CWU , it’s irrelevant to them whether the CWU agree or disagree with the ODM because it will get the same negative reaction, the same posters have been doing it year on year . It actually makes you wonder if they are Royal Mail plants actively trying to destabilise the union because the amount of time and effort they put in isn’t normal.
The CWU needs no help in getting 'slaughtered'. It's to blame entirely for the situations the members find themselves in. There's no organisation at the local level. There's no access to the machinery of the Union. Other unions can only dream of full time release branch secretaries yet those other unions can still hold monthly branch meetings. The CWU? Not a chance. The CWU deserves everything it's got coming to it - bankruptcy, begging another union to take it in and finally it's demise.
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
Acca Dacca
Posts: 3190
Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
Gender: Male

Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.

Post by Acca Dacca »

tramssirhc wrote:
23 Oct 2025, 15:30
chickenwittle wrote:
23 Oct 2025, 08:29
Acca Dacca wrote:
22 Oct 2025, 22:35
tramssirhc wrote:
22 Oct 2025, 19:14
chickenwittle wrote:
22 Oct 2025, 16:28
He’s basically said the CWU will not agree to what Royal Mail want to push through and the usual suspects find a problem with it .💁
Boulch really didn't.
Yes he did. He explicitly said the union will not agree to the failed ODM that Royal Mail want.
It’s crazy some of the lengths these posters will go to slaughter the CWU , it’s irrelevant to them whether the CWU agree or disagree with the ODM because it will get the same negative reaction, the same posters have been doing it year on year . It actually makes you wonder if they are Royal Mail plants actively trying to destabilise the union because the amount of time and effort they put in isn’t normal.
The CWU needs no help in getting 'slaughtered'. It's to blame entirely for the situations the members find themselves in. There's no organisation at the local level. There's no access to the machinery of the Union. Other unions can only dream of full time release branch secretaries yet those other unions can still hold monthly branch meetings. The CWU? Not a chance. The CWU deserves everything it's got coming to it - bankruptcy, begging another union to take it in and finally it's demise.
Valid criticism of the union is one thing but why are you lying about what Tony Bouch said or didnt say in the video though? It really does you no favours.
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
chickenwittle
Posts: 2084
Joined: 15 Nov 2009, 09:43
Gender: Male

Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.

Post by chickenwittle »

Acca Dacca wrote:
23 Oct 2025, 15:42
tramssirhc wrote:
23 Oct 2025, 15:30
chickenwittle wrote:
23 Oct 2025, 08:29
Acca Dacca wrote:
22 Oct 2025, 22:35
tramssirhc wrote:
22 Oct 2025, 19:14
chickenwittle wrote:
22 Oct 2025, 16:28
He’s basically said the CWU will not agree to what Royal Mail want to push through and the usual suspects find a problem with it .💁
Boulch really didn't.
Yes he did. He explicitly said the union will not agree to the failed ODM that Royal Mail want.
It’s crazy some of the lengths these posters will go to slaughter the CWU , it’s irrelevant to them whether the CWU agree or disagree with the ODM because it will get the same negative reaction, the same posters have been doing it year on year . It actually makes you wonder if they are Royal Mail plants actively trying to destabilise the union because the amount of time and effort they put in isn’t normal.
The CWU needs no help in getting 'slaughtered'. It's to blame entirely for the situations the members find themselves in. There's no organisation at the local level. There's no access to the machinery of the Union. Other unions can only dream of full time release branch secretaries yet those other unions can still hold monthly branch meetings. The CWU? Not a chance. The CWU deserves everything it's got coming to it - bankruptcy, begging another union to take it in and finally it's demise.
Why are you lying about what Tony Bouch said or didnt say in the video though? It really does you no favours.
I wondered where Simon Thomson had gone , honestly this guy is relentless in his hatred for a union that is far from perfect but is all we have on our side against this employer.
Sean06
Posts: 2339
Joined: 20 Nov 2023, 16:50
Gender: Male

Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.

Post by Sean06 »

Simple answer put him on foe list then you won't have to read his drivel :thumbup
Hyrrokkin
Posts: 850
Joined: 24 Nov 2021, 18:17
Gender: Male

Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.

Post by Hyrrokkin »

I see the CWU happy clappers are out in force today all smug and superior as always.
Acca Dacca
Posts: 3190
Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
Gender: Male

Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.

Post by Acca Dacca »

Hyrrokkin wrote:
23 Oct 2025, 17:43
I see the CWU happy clappers are out in force today all smug and superior as always.
Nope far from it, just calling out a lie - as I would do if it came from a union official

I watched the video. I heard what Boulch said. Why wouldnt I point out that the post is false? I notice theres still not been an acknowledgement explaining why they posted said lie.
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
chickenwittle
Posts: 2084
Joined: 15 Nov 2009, 09:43
Gender: Male

Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.

Post by chickenwittle »

Hyrrokkin wrote:
23 Oct 2025, 17:43
I see the CWU happy clappers are out in force today all smug and superior as always.
What a silly post , where is the happy clapping from anyone ? It’s merely pointing out blatant lies from a certain poster.
Sean06
Posts: 2339
Joined: 20 Nov 2023, 16:50
Gender: Male

Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.

Post by Sean06 »

chickenwittle wrote:
23 Oct 2025, 20:21
Hyrrokkin wrote:
23 Oct 2025, 17:43
I see the CWU happy clappers are out in force today all smug and superior as always.
What a silly post , where is the happy clapping from anyone ? It’s merely pointing out blatant lies from a certain poster.
But as a member of pwrfc hes going to back him up.just another cwu basher :thumbdown
Hyrrokkin
Posts: 850
Joined: 24 Nov 2021, 18:17
Gender: Male

Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.

Post by Hyrrokkin »

Sean06 wrote:
23 Oct 2025, 21:00
chickenwittle wrote:
23 Oct 2025, 20:21
Hyrrokkin wrote:
23 Oct 2025, 17:43
I see the CWU happy clappers are out in force today all smug and superior as always.
What a silly post , where is the happy clapping from anyone ? It’s merely pointing out blatant lies from a certain poster.
But as a member of pwrfc hes going to back him up.just another cwu basher :thumbdown
Awwww looks like i have triggered a few sensitive souls

:cool :cool
chickenwittle
Posts: 2084
Joined: 15 Nov 2009, 09:43
Gender: Male

Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.

Post by chickenwittle »

Hyrrokkin wrote:
24 Oct 2025, 20:45
Sean06 wrote:
23 Oct 2025, 21:00
chickenwittle wrote:
23 Oct 2025, 20:21
Hyrrokkin wrote:
23 Oct 2025, 17:43
I see the CWU happy clappers are out in force today all smug and superior as always.
What a silly post , where is the happy clapping from anyone ? It’s merely pointing out blatant lies from a certain poster.
But as a member of pwrfc hes going to back him up.just another cwu basher :thumbdown
Awwww looks like i have triggered a few sensitive souls

:cool :cool
You haven’t pointed out the happy clapping but of course you couldn’t because there wasn’t any ,👍
Sean06
Posts: 2339
Joined: 20 Nov 2023, 16:50
Gender: Male

Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.

Post by Sean06 »

Hyrrokkin wrote:
24 Oct 2025, 20:45
Sean06 wrote:
23 Oct 2025, 21:00
chickenwittle wrote:
23 Oct 2025, 20:21
Hyrrokkin wrote:
23 Oct 2025, 17:43
I see the CWU happy clappers are out in force today all smug and superior as always.
What a silly post , where is the happy clapping from anyone ? It’s merely pointing out blatant lies from a certain poster.
But as a member of pwrfc hes going to back him up.just another cwu basher :thumbdown
Awwww looks like i have triggered a few sensitive souls

:cool :cool
No sorry just pointing out you are a cwu basher :thumbdown
Hyrrokkin
Posts: 850
Joined: 24 Nov 2021, 18:17
Gender: Male

Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.

Post by Hyrrokkin »

Sean06 wrote:
25 Oct 2025, 13:38
Hyrrokkin wrote:
24 Oct 2025, 20:45
Sean06 wrote:
23 Oct 2025, 21:00
chickenwittle wrote:
23 Oct 2025, 20:21
Hyrrokkin wrote:
23 Oct 2025, 17:43
I see the CWU happy clappers are out in force today all smug and superior as always.
What a silly post , where is the happy clapping from anyone ? It’s merely pointing out blatant lies from a certain poster.
But as a member of pwrfc hes going to back him up.just another cwu basher :thumbdown
Awwww looks like i have triggered a few sensitive souls

:cool :cool
No sorry just pointing out you are a cwu basher :thumbdown
No need to say sorry we all have our point of view

And yes i am a CWU basher - they deserve it !

Over and out !
Sean06
Posts: 2339
Joined: 20 Nov 2023, 16:50
Gender: Male

Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.

Post by Sean06 »

Hyrrokkin wrote:
25 Oct 2025, 16:19
Sean06 wrote:
25 Oct 2025, 13:38
Hyrrokkin wrote:
24 Oct 2025, 20:45
Sean06 wrote:
23 Oct 2025, 21:00
chickenwittle wrote:
23 Oct 2025, 20:21
Hyrrokkin wrote:
23 Oct 2025, 17:43
I see the CWU happy clappers are out in force today all smug and superior as always.
What a silly post , where is the happy clapping from anyone ? It’s merely pointing out blatant lies from a certain poster.
But as a member of pwrfc hes going to back him up.just another cwu basher :thumbdown
Awwww looks like i have triggered a few sensitive souls

:cool :cool
No sorry just pointing out you are a cwu basher :thumbdown
No need to say sorry we all have our point of view

And yes i am a CWU basher - they deserve it !

Over and out !
Yes we do indeed but you still hav'nt pointed the happy clapper post's out. just like alot of us bash pwrfc with reason with there lunatic posts.actually wasn't saying sorry to you was more like no you hav'nt triggered any sensitive souls.