It’s crazy some of the lengths these posters will go to slaughter the CWU , it’s irrelevant to them whether the CWU agree or disagree with the ODM because it will get the same negative reaction, the same posters have been doing it year on year . It actually makes you wonder if they are Royal Mail plants actively trying to destabilise the union because the amount of time and effort they put in isn’t normal.Acca Dacca wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 22:35Yes he did. He explicitly said the union will not agree to the failed ODM that Royal Mail want.tramssirhc wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 19:14Boulch really didn't.chickenwittle wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 16:28He’s basically said the CWU will not agree to what Royal Mail want to push through and the usual suspects find a problem with it .![]()
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.
-
chickenwittle
- Posts: 2084
- Joined: 15 Nov 2009, 09:43
- Gender: Male
Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.
-
chickenwittle
- Posts: 2084
- Joined: 15 Nov 2009, 09:43
- Gender: Male
Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.
I’m not saying Royal Mail won’t attempt to do that after Xmas , I’m simply explaining what is being said in that update.SMS1969 wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 17:34What if they push things through by executive action, like the poor new contracts?chickenwittle wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 16:28He’s basically said the CWU will not agree to what Royal Mail want to push through and the usual suspects find a problem with it .![]()
-
tramssirhc
- Posts: 1640
- Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
- Gender: Male
Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.
The CWU needs no help in getting 'slaughtered'. It's to blame entirely for the situations the members find themselves in. There's no organisation at the local level. There's no access to the machinery of the Union. Other unions can only dream of full time release branch secretaries yet those other unions can still hold monthly branch meetings. The CWU? Not a chance. The CWU deserves everything it's got coming to it - bankruptcy, begging another union to take it in and finally it's demise.chickenwittle wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025, 08:29It’s crazy some of the lengths these posters will go to slaughter the CWU , it’s irrelevant to them whether the CWU agree or disagree with the ODM because it will get the same negative reaction, the same posters have been doing it year on year . It actually makes you wonder if they are Royal Mail plants actively trying to destabilise the union because the amount of time and effort they put in isn’t normal.Acca Dacca wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 22:35Yes he did. He explicitly said the union will not agree to the failed ODM that Royal Mail want.tramssirhc wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 19:14Boulch really didn't.chickenwittle wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 16:28He’s basically said the CWU will not agree to what Royal Mail want to push through and the usual suspects find a problem with it .![]()
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
-
Acca Dacca
- Posts: 3190
- Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
- Gender: Male
Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.
Valid criticism of the union is one thing but why are you lying about what Tony Bouch said or didnt say in the video though? It really does you no favours.tramssirhc wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025, 15:30The CWU needs no help in getting 'slaughtered'. It's to blame entirely for the situations the members find themselves in. There's no organisation at the local level. There's no access to the machinery of the Union. Other unions can only dream of full time release branch secretaries yet those other unions can still hold monthly branch meetings. The CWU? Not a chance. The CWU deserves everything it's got coming to it - bankruptcy, begging another union to take it in and finally it's demise.chickenwittle wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025, 08:29It’s crazy some of the lengths these posters will go to slaughter the CWU , it’s irrelevant to them whether the CWU agree or disagree with the ODM because it will get the same negative reaction, the same posters have been doing it year on year . It actually makes you wonder if they are Royal Mail plants actively trying to destabilise the union because the amount of time and effort they put in isn’t normal.Acca Dacca wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 22:35Yes he did. He explicitly said the union will not agree to the failed ODM that Royal Mail want.tramssirhc wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 19:14Boulch really didn't.chickenwittle wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 16:28He’s basically said the CWU will not agree to what Royal Mail want to push through and the usual suspects find a problem with it .![]()
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
-
chickenwittle
- Posts: 2084
- Joined: 15 Nov 2009, 09:43
- Gender: Male
Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.
I wondered where Simon Thomson had gone , honestly this guy is relentless in his hatred for a union that is far from perfect but is all we have on our side against this employer.Acca Dacca wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025, 15:42Why are you lying about what Tony Bouch said or didnt say in the video though? It really does you no favours.tramssirhc wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025, 15:30The CWU needs no help in getting 'slaughtered'. It's to blame entirely for the situations the members find themselves in. There's no organisation at the local level. There's no access to the machinery of the Union. Other unions can only dream of full time release branch secretaries yet those other unions can still hold monthly branch meetings. The CWU? Not a chance. The CWU deserves everything it's got coming to it - bankruptcy, begging another union to take it in and finally it's demise.chickenwittle wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025, 08:29It’s crazy some of the lengths these posters will go to slaughter the CWU , it’s irrelevant to them whether the CWU agree or disagree with the ODM because it will get the same negative reaction, the same posters have been doing it year on year . It actually makes you wonder if they are Royal Mail plants actively trying to destabilise the union because the amount of time and effort they put in isn’t normal.Acca Dacca wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 22:35Yes he did. He explicitly said the union will not agree to the failed ODM that Royal Mail want.tramssirhc wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 19:14Boulch really didn't.chickenwittle wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 16:28He’s basically said the CWU will not agree to what Royal Mail want to push through and the usual suspects find a problem with it .![]()
-
Sean06
- Posts: 2339
- Joined: 20 Nov 2023, 16:50
- Gender: Male
Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.
Simple answer put him on foe list then you won't have to read his drivel 
-
Hyrrokkin
- Posts: 850
- Joined: 24 Nov 2021, 18:17
- Gender: Male
Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.
I see the CWU happy clappers are out in force today all smug and superior as always.
-
Acca Dacca
- Posts: 3190
- Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
- Gender: Male
Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.
Nope far from it, just calling out a lie - as I would do if it came from a union official
I watched the video. I heard what Boulch said. Why wouldnt I point out that the post is false? I notice theres still not been an acknowledgement explaining why they posted said lie.
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
-
chickenwittle
- Posts: 2084
- Joined: 15 Nov 2009, 09:43
- Gender: Male
-
Sean06
- Posts: 2339
- Joined: 20 Nov 2023, 16:50
- Gender: Male
Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.
But as a member of pwrfc hes going to back him up.just another cwu basherchickenwittle wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025, 20:21What a silly post , where is the happy clapping from anyone ? It’s merely pointing out blatant lies from a certain poster.
-
Hyrrokkin
- Posts: 850
- Joined: 24 Nov 2021, 18:17
- Gender: Male
Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.
Awwww looks like i have triggered a few sensitive soulsSean06 wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025, 21:00But as a member of pwrfc hes going to back him up.just another cwu basherchickenwittle wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025, 20:21What a silly post , where is the happy clapping from anyone ? It’s merely pointing out blatant lies from a certain poster.![]()
-
chickenwittle
- Posts: 2084
- Joined: 15 Nov 2009, 09:43
- Gender: Male
Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.
You haven’t pointed out the happy clapping but of course you couldn’t because there wasn’t any ,Hyrrokkin wrote: ↑24 Oct 2025, 20:45Awwww looks like i have triggered a few sensitive soulsSean06 wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025, 21:00But as a member of pwrfc hes going to back him up.just another cwu basherchickenwittle wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025, 20:21What a silly post , where is the happy clapping from anyone ? It’s merely pointing out blatant lies from a certain poster.![]()
![]()
![]()
-
Sean06
- Posts: 2339
- Joined: 20 Nov 2023, 16:50
- Gender: Male
Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.
No sorry just pointing out you are a cwu basherHyrrokkin wrote: ↑24 Oct 2025, 20:45Awwww looks like i have triggered a few sensitive soulsSean06 wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025, 21:00But as a member of pwrfc hes going to back him up.just another cwu basherchickenwittle wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025, 20:21What a silly post , where is the happy clapping from anyone ? It’s merely pointing out blatant lies from a certain poster.![]()
![]()
![]()
-
Hyrrokkin
- Posts: 850
- Joined: 24 Nov 2021, 18:17
- Gender: Male
Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.
No need to say sorry we all have our point of viewSean06 wrote: ↑25 Oct 2025, 13:38No sorry just pointing out you are a cwu basherHyrrokkin wrote: ↑24 Oct 2025, 20:45Awwww looks like i have triggered a few sensitive soulsSean06 wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025, 21:00But as a member of pwrfc hes going to back him up.just another cwu basherchickenwittle wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025, 20:21What a silly post , where is the happy clapping from anyone ? It’s merely pointing out blatant lies from a certain poster.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
And yes i am a CWU basher - they deserve it !
Over and out !
-
Sean06
- Posts: 2339
- Joined: 20 Nov 2023, 16:50
- Gender: Male
Re: An update on the USO from National Officer Tony Bouch.
Yes we do indeed but you still hav'nt pointed the happy clapper post's out. just like alot of us bash pwrfc with reason with there lunatic posts.actually wasn't saying sorry to you was more like no you hav'nt triggered any sensitive souls.Hyrrokkin wrote: ↑25 Oct 2025, 16:19No need to say sorry we all have our point of viewSean06 wrote: ↑25 Oct 2025, 13:38No sorry just pointing out you are a cwu basherHyrrokkin wrote: ↑24 Oct 2025, 20:45Awwww looks like i have triggered a few sensitive soulsSean06 wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025, 21:00But as a member of pwrfc hes going to back him up.just another cwu basherchickenwittle wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025, 20:21What a silly post , where is the happy clapping from anyone ? It’s merely pointing out blatant lies from a certain poster.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
And yes i am a CWU basher - they deserve it !
Over and out !