Dave Ward gets paid £150,000+ a year to defend our T&C's, that is £20K less than the guy who has to lead this entire country. Tell me one positive thing the union have done for us amongst the river of shite they have agreed to, over the last few years?clashcityrocker wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 14:02The only defence I have ever made of Martin or the CWU is that they are less full of s**t than you are.tramssirhc wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 12:42
Seriously, this is the best you can do, in this thread. No defence of Martin, no defence of the CWU, no attack on the points made?
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
LTB 042/25 – OFCOM CONSULTATION ON USO REFORM
-
Londonsburning
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: 09 Oct 2024, 18:14
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 042/25 – OFCOM CONSULTATION ON USO REFORM
-
tramssirhc
- Posts: 1624
- Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 042/25 – OFCOM CONSULTATION ON USO REFORM
If you pay direct from your wages then contact payroll and ask them to stop the deduction.
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
-
tramssirhc
- Posts: 1624
- Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 042/25 – OFCOM CONSULTATION ON USO REFORM
That's it? That's all you've got. Unfuckingbelievable.clashcityrocker wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 14:02The only defence I have ever made of Martin or the CWU is that they are less full of s**t than you are.tramssirhc wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 12:42
Seriously, this is the best you can do, in this thread. No defence of Martin, no defence of the CWU, no attack on the points made?
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
-
clashcityrocker
- Posts: 16413
- Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
- Gender: Male
- Location: strummerville
Re: LTB 042/25 – OFCOM CONSULTATION ON USO REFORM
But it still better than anything you have got.
Now back to your homework.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
-
tramssirhc
- Posts: 1624
- Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 042/25 – OFCOM CONSULTATION ON USO REFORM
clashcityrocker wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 17:48But it still better than anything you have got.
Now back to your homework.
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
-
tramssirhc
- Posts: 1624
- Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 042/25 – OFCOM CONSULTATION ON USO REFORM
You could have been a contender.clashcityrocker wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 17:48But it still better than anything you have got.
Now back to your homework.
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
-
Nickvilla20
- Posts: 782
- Joined: 13 May 2013, 07:30
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 042/25 – OFCOM CONSULTATION ON USO REFORM
For this to work on my current delivery I would have to lose around 150 calls from the current 750 I have.
If we are going to get a 70%+ call rate daily then I have absolutely no chance of competing the delivery.
If we are going to get a 70%+ call rate daily then I have absolutely no chance of competing the delivery.
-
TopperGas
- Posts: 3273
- Joined: 13 Feb 2021, 22:46
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 042/25 – OFCOM CONSULTATION ON USO REFORM
Or work longer each day you work which seems the companies plan backed by the CWU, the earlier suggestion of decreasing duties by 20% seems to have been binned.Nickvilla20 wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:54For this to work on my current delivery I would have to lose around 150 calls from the current 750 I have.
If we are going to get a 70%+ call rate daily then I have absolutely no chance of competing the delivery.
I've no idea what happens if most of the posties in a DO refuse to work longer hours each day.
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 11990
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
-
tramssirhc
- Posts: 1624
- Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 042/25 – OFCOM CONSULTATION ON USO REFORM
Every time the CWU has agreed major change they have failed to ensure that the very basics of the job are right. The CWU has sat back and watched the chaos as workers have to do the impossible. This time is going to be no different. Unless the basics are right none of this works. The basics have been wrong for so long no one's going to pay to put them right.
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
-
tramssirhc
- Posts: 1624
- Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 042/25 – OFCOM CONSULTATION ON USO REFORM
Make sure you tell your CWU rep this. Tell your branch. The area rep, the div rep. Tell Martin Walsh. None of these people are waiting for you so don't wait for them.Nickvilla20 wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:54For this to work on my current delivery I would have to lose around 150 calls from the current 750 I have.
If we are going to get a 70%+ call rate daily then I have absolutely no chance of competing the delivery.
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
-
tramssirhc
- Posts: 1624
- Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 042/25 – OFCOM CONSULTATION ON USO REFORM
Martin Walsh has stated that there will be a vote before any change happens. Vote no.TopperGas wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 22:06Or work longer each day you work which seems the companies plan backed by the CWU, the earlier suggestion of decreasing duties by 20% seems to have been binned.Nickvilla20 wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:54For this to work on my current delivery I would have to lose around 150 calls from the current 750 I have.
If we are going to get a 70%+ call rate daily then I have absolutely no chance of competing the delivery.
I've no idea what happens if most of the posties in a DO refuse to work longer hours each day.
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 11990
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 042/25 – OFCOM CONSULTATION ON USO REFORM
Will a vote even matter? I think the changes are going to come in no matter what and I can't see the union being able to stop themtramssirhc wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025, 06:46Martin Walsh has stated that there will be a vote before any change happens. Vote no.TopperGas wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 22:06Or work longer each day you work which seems the companies plan backed by the CWU, the earlier suggestion of decreasing duties by 20% seems to have been binned.Nickvilla20 wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:54For this to work on my current delivery I would have to lose around 150 calls from the current 750 I have.
If we are going to get a 70%+ call rate daily then I have absolutely no chance of competing the delivery.
I've no idea what happens if most of the posties in a DO refuse to work longer hours each day.
-
tramssirhc
- Posts: 1624
- Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 042/25 – OFCOM CONSULTATION ON USO REFORM
That's not the CWU's position. Martin clearly stated that the members will be voting on any change. His words not mine. Let's get that no vote going.SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025, 07:41Will a vote even matter? I think the changes are going to come in no matter what and I can't see the union being able to stop themtramssirhc wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025, 06:46Martin Walsh has stated that there will be a vote before any change happens. Vote no.TopperGas wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 22:06Or work longer each day you work which seems the companies plan backed by the CWU, the earlier suggestion of decreasing duties by 20% seems to have been binned.Nickvilla20 wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:54For this to work on my current delivery I would have to lose around 150 calls from the current 750 I have.
If we are going to get a 70%+ call rate daily then I have absolutely no chance of competing the delivery.
I've no idea what happens if most of the posties in a DO refuse to work longer hours each day.
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 11990
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 042/25 – OFCOM CONSULTATION ON USO REFORM
RM will just create a new duty set and have a re-sign. Anyone who refuses to chose a duty from the new duty set will be declared supernumerary and will likely be made to move to another DO.tramssirhc wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025, 07:59That's not the CWU's position. Martin clearly stated that the members will be voting on any change. His words not mine. Let's get that no vote going.SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025, 07:41Will a vote even matter? I think the changes are going to come in no matter what and I can't see the union being able to stop themtramssirhc wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025, 06:46Martin Walsh has stated that there will be a vote before any change happens. Vote no.TopperGas wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 22:06Or work longer each day you work which seems the companies plan backed by the CWU, the earlier suggestion of decreasing duties by 20% seems to have been binned.Nickvilla20 wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:54For this to work on my current delivery I would have to lose around 150 calls from the current 750 I have.
If we are going to get a 70%+ call rate daily then I have absolutely no chance of competing the delivery.
I've no idea what happens if most of the posties in a DO refuse to work longer hours each day.