ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Network review.

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16408
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: Network review.

Post by clashcityrocker »

daveyeff wrote:
06 Dec 2023, 16:59

agree entirely. we are a spent force. cheers Dave and Andy.
I don't think Dave and Andy are to blame.
Andy was forced to step in due to the absence of Pullinger.
Dave's remit wasn't delivery. That was Terry but he was absent.

The whole s**t show they inherited was one of Terry's making. Overpromise. Underdeliver.
What really worries me is Walsh appears to be one of his disciples.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
daveyeff
Posts: 4699
Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
Gender: Male

Re: Network review.

Post by daveyeff »

Pullinger or not, they ran the dispute. they got the members to accept this ''shitshow''. i still wonder though how it would've all panned out HAD Pullinger not been sidelined, would he have escalated the dispute? called us ''all out''? he infamously said '' i would rather smash the lot than give in to them''...we will never know now.
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16408
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: Network review.

Post by clashcityrocker »

Terry was never going to smash the company.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
Valentina@1
Posts: 820
Joined: 13 Apr 2023, 16:48
Gender: Male

Re: Network review.

Post by Valentina@1 »

clashcityrocker wrote:
07 Dec 2023, 21:44
Terry was never going to smash the company.
Can someone check up on ward & furey….these sellouts on missing list😡😡😡
daveyeff
Posts: 4699
Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
Gender: Male

Re: Network review.

Post by daveyeff »

aye,....not a toot from either. must be busy constructing their ''strongly worded'' letter to ofcom/RM.....oh,..wait a minute. :roll:
Sean06
Posts: 2323
Joined: 20 Nov 2023, 16:50
Gender: Male

Re: Network review.

Post by Sean06 »

daveyeff wrote:
09 Dec 2023, 17:40
aye,....not a toot from either. must be busy constructing their ''strongly worded'' letter to ofcom/RM.....oh,..wait a minute. :roll:
Do you honestly think pullinger would have smashed the company??.
daveyeff
Posts: 4699
Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
Gender: Male

Re: Network review.

Post by daveyeff »

no, but i do believe he would've put up a better fight than the "other 2". we may have fared better.
guardianangel
Posts: 1782
Joined: 21 Feb 2020, 19:40
Gender: Male

Re: Network review.

Post by guardianangel »

I can hold my hand up and say i was one of the 30 % who voted NO,i am now going to sit back and laugh at them all moaning and dripping after xmas, only a few years left for me and no commitments ,you had the win in the bag but bottled it ,its just a sad society now as the companies have you really believing your own self worth,i just hope your children are learning a valuable lesson when their time comes after watching their parents throw it all away.