Well i have no reason to think the original post is a lie so why are CWU reps giving out this information if it isn't true?
There's not really anything to debate, it's either true or false
As a CWU rep I can tell you there is nothing official in any of these rumours, they are nothing more than unsubstantiated hearsay passing from one rep or member to another.
My reps would strongly disagree with you.Woody Guthrie wrote: ↑17 Aug 2023, 18:56As a CWU rep I can tell you there is nothing official in any of these rumours, they are nothing more than unsubstantiated hearsay passing from one rep or member to another.
CWU reps are not giving this information out in any official capacity. If they say they are then they are definitely lying.
Well thanks for clearing that up, looks like some reps may have gone off script or there's been a lack of communication againWoody Guthrie wrote: ↑17 Aug 2023, 18:56As a CWU rep I can tell you there is nothing official in any of these rumours, they are nothing more than unsubstantiated hearsay passing from one rep or member to another.
CWU reps are not giving this information out in any official capacity. If they say they are then they are definitely lying.
As you say, it isn’t in any way likely to turn around the company in the short term, as you still have staff on payroll who want paying. Suddenly stopping Saturday letters doesn’t start to have any financial benefit for potentially years when you start turning over staff at a rate that makes it worthwhile.Foxel wrote: ↑17 Aug 2023, 18:24It's not my plan.LouBarlow wrote: ↑17 Aug 2023, 17:32How does a pause in delivering letters on a Saturday turn the business around? People aren’t ordering as many parcels. Not sure stopping letters on one day is going to solve that. Unless you literally close the office for that day and save costs that way. It seems a bizarre tactic.![]()
But I don't believe for a second that the actual plan is to pause Saturday mail. They never mean to start it again.
The savings will be in wages. One person could do 2 to 3 rounds of tracked parcels on a Saturday or Sunday with no mail. You could half the Saturday wage bill, and look at sorting the Sunday agency splurge.
Have they shown you any official communication from CWU HQ on the subject?Foxel wrote: ↑17 Aug 2023, 19:05My reps would strongly disagree with you.Woody Guthrie wrote: ↑17 Aug 2023, 18:56As a CWU rep I can tell you there is nothing official in any of these rumours, they are nothing more than unsubstantiated hearsay passing from one rep or member to another.
CWU reps are not giving this information out in any official capacity. If they say they are then they are definitely lying.
well questions are starting to be asked in our office. few lads have said there doesn't seem to any or very little rumours on social media as stated by the rep. he also said there is an ongoing meeting happening with the union and RM, .....why has nobody heard about this? its completely obvious that the statement made about RM will run out of money in October if the USO is not scrapped is an absolute lie. its NOT going to happen. so the big question in ours at the moment is.....WHY would he come out with this pile of shite if its totally unfounded? what is the purpose? he's been a rep for at least 10 years. some think he's ok some think he's a useless tosser. but either way, WHY would he get the whole office into the canteen and make this statement. he DID say 'don't shoot the messenger'. it will come out in the next few days or whatever. as soon as i know, i will put it on here.Woody Guthrie wrote: ↑17 Aug 2023, 19:31Have they shown you any official communication from CWU HQ on the subject?Foxel wrote: ↑17 Aug 2023, 19:05My reps would strongly disagree with you.Woody Guthrie wrote: ↑17 Aug 2023, 18:56As a CWU rep I can tell you there is nothing official in any of these rumours, they are nothing more than unsubstantiated hearsay passing from one rep or member to another.
CWU reps are not giving this information out in any official capacity. If they say they are then they are definitely lying.
Anything from Royal Mail?
Anything at all?
They can only strongly disagree with me if they have evidence this is official, otherwise it's just rumour no matter the source.
well thats turned out to be crap for a start. the dom asked us in the middle of the floor if ANYone was available for their days off next week as they are in total s**t street for coverage. double rest days as well.
North East .....Tyne&Wearsimon goodman wrote: ↑17 Aug 2023, 19:12What part of the country are you from? Down south we’ve heard nothing
Oh, yes. Silly me. Course it was, and course they did. How remiss of me to forget.Foxel wrote: ↑17 Aug 2023, 18:25Because it was bought with it and the buyers knew it came with it. Also, it was a bargain at the time.DirtyHarry wrote: ↑17 Aug 2023, 18:12Royal Mail is a private company now.
Why should it, out of all the private companies competing in the parcels market, be forced to provide a universal service?
Only a government owned, treasury backed, company, should do such a thing.
I'm afraid the USO's days were numbered when Vince Cable did the Tories dirty work for them.
Ce le vie, as the French say.
There are some facts around this.WHY would he come out with this pile of shite if its totally unfounded?
Looks like the op now thinks its false.how many times have we heard the rumour on here rm are running out of money.A2B wrote: ↑17 Aug 2023, 18:30Well i have no reason to think the original post is a lie so why are CWU reps giving out this information if it isn't true?
There's not really anything to debate, it's either true or false