ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

In for a penny

Pay talks 2022 discussion, news, LTB's RMCtv and all BUSINESS RECOVERY, TRANSFORMATION AND GROWTH AGREEMENT chat
Duesouth
Posts: 266
Joined: 14 Sep 2018, 17:25
Gender: Male

In for a penny

Post by Duesouth »

Once again got told that the business is in dire straits and we need to save cash as the pot has dried up. Instead of saving pounds it's pennies now (scraping at the barrel).

Got asked if WE can come up with any ideas or solutions on how to make the business more efficient. Many said we don't get paid enough to come up with brainstorming idea's. If the business is in such a state then that's not our fault, but the people that are running this show. We all come in to work get the job done then go home. Everything else within the workplace is of no interest.
Phantom
Posts: 1234
Joined: 27 Dec 2007, 18:17
Gender: Female
Location: New York

Re: In for a penny

Post by Phantom »

:chuckle :chuckle :chuckle :chuckle :chuckle
CUT OFF!!!
worktotime
Posts: 2860
Joined: 14 May 2010, 20:47
Gender: Male

Re: In for a penny

Post by worktotime »

should have told them to ring thompson or the new ceo hes on 700k :thumbup
noggin1969
Posts: 1321
Joined: 13 Oct 2009, 17:28
Gender: Male

Re: In for a penny

Post by noggin1969 »

x
Last edited by noggin1969 on 01 Feb 2024, 15:51, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Basildon Bond
Posts: 406
Joined: 21 Dec 2022, 19:21
Gender: Male

Re: In for a penny

Post by Basildon Bond »

Duesouth wrote:
15 Aug 2023, 19:51
...how to make the business more efficient.
More "efficient" or more "profitable"? I'll assume the latter. :whistle

However, if the business really did want to be more efficient it could. Like yorks where the base raises slight as you remove packets/parcels from it and the weight reduces so you save time and your back reaching for the next one...some sort of revolutionary, yet to be invented spring mechanism perhaps? Sorry, guess I'm dreaming a york like that could ever exist and be kept in service.

Changes will always cost money to implement and hence will probably not be adopted hence why we will generally roll our eyes at mentioning anything that occurs to us that actually do the job.
Jb1969
Posts: 369
Joined: 29 May 2014, 13:06
Gender: Male

Re: In for a penny

Post by Jb1969 »

ruckus wrote:
15 Aug 2023, 20:53
Duesouth wrote:
15 Aug 2023, 19:51
...how to make the business more efficient.
More "efficient" or more "profitable"? I'll assume the latter. :whistle

However, if the business really did want to be more efficient it could. Like yorks where the base raises slight as you remove packets/parcels from it and the weight reduces so you save time and your back reaching for the next one...some sort of revolutionary, yet to be invented spring mechanism perhaps? Sorry, guess I'm dreaming a york like that could ever exist and be kept in service.

Changes will always cost money to implement and hence will probably not be adopted hence why we will generally roll our eyes at mentioning anything that occurs to us that actually do the job.
From what I have seen the new sleeves are a disaster.
1000s are being sent back damaged & unlikely to be repaired.
Another fine idea from some spotty newly graduated student out to impress😂
Tman
Posts: 4099
Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 09:57

Re: In for a penny

Post by Tman »

ruckus wrote:
15 Aug 2023, 20:53
Like yorks where the base raises slight as you remove packets/parcels from it and the weight reduces so you save time and your back reaching for the next one...some sort of revolutionary, yet to be invented spring mechanism perhaps?
RM had similar years ago, they were called ALT's (auto levelling trolleys).
RHONE
Posts: 118
Joined: 14 Nov 2020, 15:54
Gender: Male

Re: In for a penny

Post by RHONE »

Sounds more like a ploy to tell us no £500 bonus now :no no
dazzler123
Posts: 468
Joined: 11 Oct 2021, 17:36
Gender: Male

Re: In for a penny

Post by dazzler123 »

Jb1969 wrote:
15 Aug 2023, 21:00
ruckus wrote:
15 Aug 2023, 20:53
Duesouth wrote:
15 Aug 2023, 19:51
...how to make the business more efficient.
More "efficient" or more "profitable"? I'll assume the latter. :whistle

However, if the business really did want to be more efficient it could. Like yorks where the base raises slight as you remove packets/parcels from it and the weight reduces so you save time and your back reaching for the next one...some sort of revolutionary, yet to be invented spring mechanism perhaps? Sorry, guess I'm dreaming a york like that could ever exist and be kept in service.

Changes will always cost money to implement and hence will probably not be adopted hence why we will generally roll our eyes at mentioning anything that occurs to us that actually do the job.
From what I have seen the new sleeves are a disaster.
1000s are being sent back damaged & unlikely to be repaired.
Another fine idea from some spotty newly graduated student out to impress😂
weve had several explode parcels all over the floor, its comical. Thats just the weight, without thinking of the ones that are torn and ripped apart at the sides
guardianangel
Posts: 1782
Joined: 21 Feb 2020, 19:40
Gender: Male

Re: In for a penny

Post by guardianangel »

Tell them to phone a friend.
enskied
Posts: 1876
Joined: 16 Aug 2013, 17:14
Gender: Male

Re: In for a penny

Post by enskied »

I think it's all up to the YES voter's to save the day.
olilew
Posts: 594
Joined: 19 May 2010, 22:04
Gender: Male

Re: In for a penny

Post by olilew »

RHONE wrote:
15 Aug 2023, 21:17
Sounds more like a ploy to tell us no £500 bonus now :no no
Our rep has told us today that the Company states their 'financial situation will hit crisis point in September'. Remind me when the lump sums are due again? They will therefore be appealing to Ofcom to cease mail delivery on Saturdays. It would come in by October. Apparently they don't have to go to Govt if they are in a financial emergency, only Ofcom.
"Just take it out and see how you go......."
aiden01
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 7001
Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
Gender: Male

Re: In for a penny

Post by aiden01 »

enskied wrote:
15 Aug 2023, 21:50
I think it's all up to the YES voter's to save the day.
WHY
thefox
Posts: 1112
Joined: 24 Aug 2010, 20:09
Gender: Male

Re: In for a penny

Post by thefox »

RHONE wrote:
15 Aug 2023, 21:17
Sounds more like a ploy to tell us no £500 bonus now :no no
That was my first thought.
Nickvilla20
Posts: 780
Joined: 13 May 2013, 07:30
Gender: Male

Re: In for a penny

Post by Nickvilla20 »

I would imagine there is more than enough money in the escrow to pay both lump sums. I wouldn’t think that was under threat.