ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Rumours or not

Pay talks 2022 discussion, news, LTB's RMCtv and all BUSINESS RECOVERY, TRANSFORMATION AND GROWTH AGREEMENT chat
steve2zaf
Posts: 76
Joined: 22 Jan 2010, 16:21
Gender: Male

Re: Rumours or not

Post by steve2zaf »

I would piss my pants if they don’t pay up . How would the yes voters take it I wonder. As a no voter I honestly wouldn’t give a monkeys if we got it or not . I would love to see the explosive atmosphere if they renege on the payments.
RTP
Posts: 863
Joined: 22 Apr 2011, 14:24
Gender: Male

Re: Rumours or not

Post by RTP »

What I don't understand is that Royal Mail BOUGHT the likes of GLS etc and now its a case of "stand on your own two feet, they are all seperate now".

Union even told us that others countries postal networks do this to fund the USO.

Postal Politics.
Woody Guthrie
Posts: 5166
Joined: 29 Sep 2018, 20:47
Gender: Male

Re: Rumours or not

Post by Woody Guthrie »

Keith Williams has stated to shareholders only a few months ago that the company has retained earnings of £3.8 billion
Could you provide a link because that would be more than the entire listed value of the company...
Only dead fish follow the current
Geordiepapa
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 87
Joined: 06 Nov 2022, 16:23
Gender: Male

Re: Rumours or not

Post by Geordiepapa »

Postee2 wrote:
18 Jul 2023, 15:54
I've said this before, but I believe small (retail) shareholders will effectively be wiped out following an eventual share re-issue that will water down and dilute existing small share holders, but give large share holders the opportunity to increase their holding at bargain basement prices.
An equity raise / debt for equity swap whatever you want to call it, at some point I feel is on the cards here.
And to be honest, if it saves the business and our jobs, I'm all up for it.

As a long serving postie who didn't run and cash in their shares at the first opportunity, and who still has the shares, then I would care about the scenario you have just described!
rubberbond
Posts: 1497
Joined: 24 Aug 2014, 16:03
Gender: Male

Re: Rumours or not

Post by rubberbond »

LouBarlow wrote:
18 Jul 2023, 18:22
richj2009 wrote:
18 Jul 2023, 17:27
There is not a chance in hell 1400 is coming our way end of September. How any board interested in the future would give away what they have will absolutely not part ways with cash to us, the least important members of this revolting company.
What are you basing this on, considering we have a binding contract that clearly states this will be happening? You can’t just pull statements out of your arse without justifying them.
Let’s review this statement in September,to see if the pessimism of the OP was correct , or whether Royal Mail will be as disingenuous as they always are.
User avatar
markyRFC
Posts: 112
Joined: 21 Jun 2023, 09:40
Gender: Male
Location: Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea

Re: Rumours or not

Post by markyRFC »

LouBarlow wrote:
18 Jul 2023, 18:22
What are you basing this on, considering we have a binding contract that clearly states this will be happening? You can’t just pull statements out of your arse without justifying them.
the lump sums being delayed, 4.1.3 and the new sickness procedures 6.4

what are you basing your trust with RM on ?
Juche
Mr Rush
Posts: 3048
Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 14:27
Gender: Male

Re: Rumours or not

Post by Mr Rush »

Geordiepapa wrote:
19 Jul 2023, 15:25
Postee2 wrote:
18 Jul 2023, 15:54
I've said this before, but I believe small (retail) shareholders will effectively be wiped out following an eventual share re-issue that will water down and dilute existing small share holders, but give large share holders the opportunity to increase their holding at bargain basement prices.
An equity raise / debt for equity swap whatever you want to call it, at some point I feel is on the cards here.
And to be honest, if it saves the business and our jobs, I'm all up for it.
As a long serving postie who didn't run and cash in their shares at the first opportunity, and who still has the shares, then I would care about the scenario you have just described!
Tell Sid they're going to reapportion the pie.
The machine stops.
postslippete
Posts: 4099
Joined: 14 Jul 2014, 16:27
Gender: Male

Re: Rumours or not

Post by postslippete »

Woody Guthrie wrote:
19 Jul 2023, 04:22
Keith Williams has stated to shareholders only a few months ago that the company has retained earnings of £3.8 billion
Could you provide a link because that would be more than the entire listed value of the company...

It was mentioned by Keith Williams in the shareholder meeting at the Bank of America's HQ.

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2023/0 ... f-m26.html



And if you are interested, there is an absolute wealth of financial information that you can find here for the year 2021-22

https://www.research-tree.com/newsfeed/ ... 22-1412717
On the face of it, shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world.
Ali831
Posts: 268
Joined: 26 Aug 2019, 16:03
Gender: Female

Re: Rumours or not

Post by Ali831 »

Phantom wrote:
18 Jul 2023, 16:30
More overtime than you can shake a stick at, at my DO.

Loads of agency staff, untrained, not scanning, door stepping parcels etc.

Absolute shambles!!!
We must be in the same office!
Woody Guthrie
Posts: 5166
Joined: 29 Sep 2018, 20:47
Gender: Male

Re: Rumours or not

Post by Woody Guthrie »

postslippete wrote:
19 Jul 2023, 20:41
Woody Guthrie wrote:
19 Jul 2023, 04:22
Keith Williams has stated to shareholders only a few months ago that the company has retained earnings of £3.8 billion
Could you provide a link because that would be more than the entire listed value of the company...

It was mentioned by Keith Williams in the shareholder meeting at the Bank of America's HQ.

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2023/0 ... f-m26.html
No pete a proper link where Keith Williams mentions the £3.8 billion.
Not some unsubstantiated nonsense by those anti-union idiots at the WSWS.
If he said it.
It must have be out there somewhere.
If he did say it.

There's certainly nothing in the accounts to suggest it's true and you would think it would be.
Only dead fish follow the current
Acca Dacca
Posts: 3189
Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
Gender: Male

Re: Rumours or not

Post by Acca Dacca »

Woody is right, there is nothing out there to be found with Williams saying that except for that one source.
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
postslippete
Posts: 4099
Joined: 14 Jul 2014, 16:27
Gender: Male

Re: Rumours or not

Post by postslippete »

I actually tend to use Yahoo finance for a lot of research on stocks!! But here's a better link.


https://uk.advfn.com/stock-market/londo ... financials


Look at the total equity for Royal Mail 2023. Its at £3.8 billion.


Owners equity is quite simply the assets minus the liabilities of the company and it simply represents the business owners share of the company.

In corporations they tend to call it "retained earnings". It's basically income or profit that is not paid out as dividends i.e. money that is retained or kept in the company's accounts.


Whilst the wsws is anti-union, there is a lot of truth in that article, to which you will find in the other link that I posted....
On the face of it, shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world.
renrag40
Posts: 423
Joined: 05 Jun 2019, 00:35
Gender: Male

Re: Rumours or not

Post by renrag40 »

From the most recent accounts dated 26/3/23
Page 39
Retained earnings £5,248,000,000...... 2022
Retained earnings £3,761,000,000...... 2023
Page 42
Cash & cash equivalents £1,137,000,000....2022
Cash & cash equivalents £809,000,000 .....2023
Page 50
People numbers in 2022 155,011
People numbers in 2023 143,553.
Full time equivalents.
LouBarlow
Posts: 4682
Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 18:56

Re: Rumours or not

Post by LouBarlow »

markyRFC wrote:
19 Jul 2023, 17:21
LouBarlow wrote:
18 Jul 2023, 18:22
What are you basing this on, considering we have a binding contract that clearly states this will be happening? You can’t just pull statements out of your arse without justifying them.
the lump sums being delayed, 4.1.3 and the new sickness procedures 6.4

what are you basing your trust with RM on ?
The language used for the lump sum section was flimsy and open to interpretation. As I’ve said, I will save my anger for that one if the payment doesn’t turn up in September (or hopefully before).

I’m not sure what people were expecting with the sickness procedures. They stated that they would be upping the time period to a year, so of course people were going to have current stages extended by 6 months. It sucks, but so does pretty much all of that section and the new T&Cs.
User avatar
markyRFC
Posts: 112
Joined: 21 Jun 2023, 09:40
Gender: Male
Location: Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea

Re: Rumours or not

Post by markyRFC »

LouBarlow wrote:
20 Jul 2023, 05:05
It sucks, but so does pretty much all of that section and the new T&Cs.
the whole deal sucks, every single last part of it

still havnt answered me bro, where are you getting your trust from with RM?

they ripped up the 4 pillars, ripped up the pathway to change, what makes you think they have changed and this be so different?
Juche