ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Why aren't we with them CWU
-
RHONE
- Posts: 118
- Joined: 14 Nov 2020, 15:54
- Gender: Male
Re: Why aren't we with them CWU
We should be standing strong, unbelievable CWU ....
-
CRIBMAD
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 835
- Joined: 11 Oct 2016, 13:38
- Gender: Male
Re: Why aren't we with them CWU
Because Ward and his cronies are terrified of losing their huge salaries !
-
X_hamster
- Posts: 96
- Joined: 07 Feb 2013, 10:53
- Gender: Male
Re: Why aren't we with them CWU
Cause RM are going to do it anyway, is the current Yessers party line.
-
hans solo
- Posts: 3238
- Joined: 06 Feb 2011, 18:08
- Gender: Male
Re: Why aren't we with them CWU
They must have threatened not to subsidise CWU and pec executives wages and put them out on delivery that’s why
And 60 grand a year for communication mr Webb f**k me he’s blew 2 ballots with his shite
And 60 grand a year for communication mr Webb f**k me he’s blew 2 ballots with his shite
-
LouBarlow
- Posts: 4611
- Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 18:56
Re: Why aren't we with them CWU
Because people are dumb enough to have been brainwashed into thinking the union paid to look after their best interests are somehow more responsible for this predicament than the company who are actually damaging their working conditions, through years of corporate greed.
-
needadvice
- MDEC
- Posts: 244
- Joined: 20 Jun 2012, 23:39
- Gender: Female
Re: Why aren't we with them CWU
And we all know, RM need a deal. It's too expensive running a company without the backing and acceptance of 115,000 employees. RM walking away from negotiations after a NO vote would be business suicide. We are now the negotiators, not CWU
-
needadvice
- MDEC
- Posts: 244
- Joined: 20 Jun 2012, 23:39
- Gender: Female
Re: Why aren't we with them CWU
You again! Gosh, how much time do you have on your hands? Make your point and live your life!LouBarlow wrote: ↑20 Jun 2023, 13:33Because people are dumb enough to have been brainwashed into thinking the union paid to look after their best interests are somehow more responsible for this predicament than the company who are actually damaging their working conditions, through years of corporate greed.
-
Jinder
- Posts: 60
- Joined: 21 Oct 2019, 16:06
- Gender: Male
Re: Why aren't we with them CWU
He’s obviously on the union payrollneedadvice wrote: ↑20 Jun 2023, 14:02You again! Gosh, how much time do you have on your hands? Make your point and live your life!LouBarlow wrote: ↑20 Jun 2023, 13:33Because people are dumb enough to have been brainwashed into thinking the union paid to look after their best interests are somehow more responsible for this predicament than the company who are actually damaging their working conditions, through years of corporate greed.
-
LouBarlow
- Posts: 4611
- Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 18:56
Re: Why aren't we with them CWU
It takes as long for me to respond to your post as it takes you to make it. I’m also on delivery when I usually contribute so the best of both worlds.needadvice wrote: ↑20 Jun 2023, 14:02You again! Gosh, how much time do you have on your hands? Make your point and live your life!LouBarlow wrote: ↑20 Jun 2023, 13:33Because people are dumb enough to have been brainwashed into thinking the union paid to look after their best interests are somehow more responsible for this predicament than the company who are actually damaging their working conditions, through years of corporate greed.
This is a new one. I’ve been accused of being a manager before, but I’ll take this one as a compliment.
-
guardianangel
- Posts: 1782
- Joined: 21 Feb 2020, 19:40
- Gender: Male
Re: Why aren't we with them CWU
Now is the time to be getting better conditions not worsening them,the CWU are a disgrace at the moment ,at the beginning they were going to get this and that and over time have caved in to Royal Mail's narrative and how they think the company should change.I will always vote NO on any agreement that try's to change terms and conditions that are there to protect the worker and would expect my union never to put that on the table,im afraid our union leaders are going to have to dig deep and find a backbone they have let us down badly ,lets see if they can get some respect back when the NO vote comes back.
-
X_hamster
- Posts: 96
- Joined: 07 Feb 2013, 10:53
- Gender: Male
Re: Why aren't we with them CWU
You'll be getting pulled in under the deal of the century for yellow dotting on your PDA actuals....LouBarlow wrote: ↑20 Jun 2023, 14:46It takes as long for me to respond to your post as it takes you to make it. I’m also on delivery when I usually contribute so the best of both worlds.needadvice wrote: ↑20 Jun 2023, 14:02You again! Gosh, how much time do you have on your hands? Make your point and live your life!LouBarlow wrote: ↑20 Jun 2023, 13:33Because people are dumb enough to have been brainwashed into thinking the union paid to look after their best interests are somehow more responsible for this predicament than the company who are actually damaging their working conditions, through years of corporate greed.
This is a new one. I’ve been accused of being a manager before, but I’ll take this one as a compliment.
In Fact possiby not
-
guardianangel
- Posts: 1782
- Joined: 21 Feb 2020, 19:40
- Gender: Male
Re: Why aren't we with them CWU
Exactly production has gone down big time the amount of agency workers coming in now to clear up the mess,i think they are slowly losing control.needadvice wrote: ↑20 Jun 2023, 14:02And we all know, RM need a deal. It's too expensive running a company without the backing and acceptance of 115,000 employees. RM walking away from negotiations after a NO vote would be business suicide. We are now the negotiators, not CWU
-
guardianangel
- Posts: 1782
- Joined: 21 Feb 2020, 19:40
- Gender: Male
Re: Why aren't we with them CWU
Already pulling people in in our office and already started the counselling ,getting ready for a yes vote when they will start conducting, VOTE NO !!X_hamster wrote: ↑20 Jun 2023, 14:51You'll be getting pulled in under the deal of the century for yellow dotting on your PDA actuals....LouBarlow wrote: ↑20 Jun 2023, 14:46It takes as long for me to respond to your post as it takes you to make it. I’m also on delivery when I usually contribute so the best of both worlds.needadvice wrote: ↑20 Jun 2023, 14:02You again! Gosh, how much time do you have on your hands? Make your point and live your life!LouBarlow wrote: ↑20 Jun 2023, 13:33Because people are dumb enough to have been brainwashed into thinking the union paid to look after their best interests are somehow more responsible for this predicament than the company who are actually damaging their working conditions, through years of corporate greed.
This is a new one. I’ve been accused of being a manager before, but I’ll take this one as a compliment.
In Fact possiby not
-
enskied
- Posts: 1876
- Joined: 16 Aug 2013, 17:14
- Gender: Male
Re: Why aren't we with them CWU
My PDA actuals where checked yesterday as I brought a lot back including tracked, untracked and bags of mail.guardianangel wrote: ↑20 Jun 2023, 14:58Already pulling people in in our office and already started the counselling ,getting ready for a yes vote when they will start conducting, VOTE NO !!X_hamster wrote: ↑20 Jun 2023, 14:51You'll be getting pulled in under the deal of the century for yellow dotting on your PDA actuals....LouBarlow wrote: ↑20 Jun 2023, 14:46It takes as long for me to respond to your post as it takes you to make it. I’m also on delivery when I usually contribute so the best of both worlds.needadvice wrote: ↑20 Jun 2023, 14:02You again! Gosh, how much time do you have on your hands? Make your point and live your life!LouBarlow wrote: ↑20 Jun 2023, 13:33Because people are dumb enough to have been brainwashed into thinking the union paid to look after their best interests are somehow more responsible for this predicament than the company who are actually damaging their working conditions, through years of corporate greed.
This is a new one. I’ve been accused of being a manager before, but I’ll take this one as a compliment.
In Fact possiby not
Was put on a duty that hadn't been out since last Friday and all the mail was brought back then.
My Actuals showed I didn't stop