Pkts aren't getting to people on time now. We're sending customers text messages when we scan to core route, then bringing back what we can't manage in our time, to scan back in as delivery not attempted. Some people will be waiting in for a pkt that you know you'll never get around to doing. Service? What service. It's appalling.stevejm wrote: ↑11 May 2023, 17:45If that happens the CWU can say that they will strike when the timing is right. [ie autumn]billycat wrote: ↑11 May 2023, 16:53If a no vote comes back the only option the cwu have is an all out strike anything else will be laughed at by royal mail the question is how many members will support this the office i work at will not they were on the brink just before xmas of returning to work members arguing with each other, time will tell.
If you are a customer of R.M how do you think that would make you feel about continuing to be a customer?
Businesses that use RM for packet and parcel delivery will want certainty that their packets are going to get to their customers on time. They will be mindful of pictures of hundreds of yorks packed with parcels left in car parks subject to the vagaries of the weather and the hunger pangs of rats. Not to mention all the complaints they received from their own customers during these strike periods.
Putting it mildly - it would be very disconcerting and liable to see a percentage of those customers take preemptive action to assure future efficient deliveries by taking their business to a competitor of RM
RM will know this too
Sure it will drive the share price down for Kretinsky to buy cheap - as some would insist has been the plan all along. But he'd be buying lower priced shares of a less valuable company! Not to mention his current shares would be losing value.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Glasgow reject deal
-
rambo1
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: 12 Jun 2013, 20:00
- Gender: Male
Re: Glasgow reject deal
-
Acca Dacca
- Posts: 3189
- Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
- Gender: Male
Re: Glasgow reject deal
Yes but its still pedanticrambo1 wrote: ↑11 May 2023, 22:34But people still have their own vote. Just coz Glasgow branch recommended no vote, means nothing, just as CWU nationally recommended yes vote. Again, means nothing. Only thing that counts is individuals opinions and therefore, votes.Acca Dacca wrote: ↑11 May 2023, 15:27Pedantry
The Glasgow branch are recommending their members vote NO when their papers come
That’s what is meant by 'Glasgow'
The thread is about Glasgow branch recommending its members reject the deal - you are right that doesnt mean most Glasgow posties will vote NO but again thats being pedantic, everyone knows there hasnt been a vote yet. You know what was meant by Glasgow reject deal.
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
-
stevejm
- Posts: 488
- Joined: 09 Dec 2017, 16:16
- Gender: Male
Re: Glasgow reject deal
Well, in that case, you can imagine RM's corporate customers [but also smaller ones too] are not happy now so if further strikes were probable in the medium term future then as a business owner I'd be at least preparing a back-up plan of moving by business to an RM competitor.rambo1 wrote: ↑11 May 2023, 22:39Pkts aren't getting to people on time now. We're sending customers text messages when we scan to core route, then bringing back what we can't manage in our time, to scan back in as delivery not attempted. Some people will be waiting in for a pkt that you know you'll never get around to doing. Service? What service. It's appalling.stevejm wrote: ↑11 May 2023, 17:45
If that happens the CWU can say that they will strike when the timing is right. [ie autumn]
If you are a customer of R.M how do you think that would make you feel about continuing to be a customer?
Businesses that use RM for packet and parcel delivery will want certainty that their packets are going to get to their customers on time. They will be mindful of pictures of hundreds of yorks packed with parcels left in car parks subject to the vagaries of the weather and the hunger pangs of rats. Not to mention all the complaints they received from their own customers during these strike periods.
Putting it mildly - it would be very disconcerting and liable to see a percentage of those customers take preemptive action to assure future efficient deliveries by taking their business to a competitor of RM
RM will know this too
Sure it will drive the share price down for Kretinsky to buy cheap - as some would insist has been the plan all along. But he'd be buying lower priced shares of a less valuable company! Not to mention his current shares would be losing value.
I used to be an owner in a chilled food business. I always had backup suppliers in mind just in case.
-
portadown
- Posts: 169
- Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 17:19
Re: Glasgow reject deal
All I can say is good luck cwu when u come to Belfast as all I can hear is a big no
-
portadown
- Posts: 169
- Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 17:19
-
X_hamster
- Posts: 96
- Joined: 07 Feb 2013, 10:53
- Gender: Male
Re: Glasgow reject deal
First we've saw it , in letter format like that
Well Done Glasgow.
Can go round the houses saying everyone has an individual vote - course they do.
But the message in offices, mc's, here and all social media channels now is a clear no!!! The dogs on the continuously revised rounds even know it!
Perhaps the very quiet majority will force it through
Well Done Glasgow.
Can go round the houses saying everyone has an individual vote - course they do.
But the message in offices, mc's, here and all social media channels now is a clear no!!! The dogs on the continuously revised rounds even know it!
Perhaps the very quiet majority will force it through
-
aiden01
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 7001
- Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
- Gender: Male
Re: Glasgow reject deal
Don,t understand how it takes balls its either a yes or a no.seems like a helluva lot of cwu members are voting no does that take balls also seeing leadership are recommending it.Acca Dacca wrote: ↑11 May 2023, 22:14It still takes balls for the branch to go against the leadership's recommendations no matter how you think the vote will goaiden01 wrote: ↑11 May 2023, 21:44What if the members of the glasgow branch come back with a yes vote will mean nothing.like ive already said members make their own minds up.if you have to rely on your branch telling you how to vote god help us all.im sure the branches rejecting the agreement now probably recommended most of the pec.
I would be easier for some of them to just ''play the game'' and go along with it
-
aiden01
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 7001
- Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
- Gender: Male
-
77SAMPOST77
- PARCELFORCE
- Posts: 365
- Joined: 20 Sep 2022, 15:49
- Gender: Male
Re: Glasgow reject deal
Every single person I know in royal mail is voting no .
It is a terrible deal and there is no point in voting yes because it will be a green light to let royal mail walk all over you for evermore .
-
X_hamster
- Posts: 96
- Joined: 07 Feb 2013, 10:53
- Gender: Male
Re: Glasgow reject deal
Good luck with your vote
They will be back for more within the year
Close more MC's, get rid of staff
And swamp the super hubs with the two tier employees.
All before the current employees contracts echo theres and it becomes a 1 tier shite gig contract.
Sounds super
-
daveyeff
- Posts: 4699
- Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
- Gender: Male
Re: Glasgow reject deal
The thing is about this though is....what are HQ not seeing about this deal that Glasgow and Wales ARE seeing? Theyve recommended a no, but HQ have not?
-
X_hamster
- Posts: 96
- Joined: 07 Feb 2013, 10:53
- Gender: Male
Re: Glasgow reject deal
Self preservation for the union in the workplace.
Was the first words out their mouth at turf moor before the s**t show was unraveled.
Seems the local amals are actually looking after their employees best interests and trying to stave off the race to tje bottom on t's & c's
-
Acca Dacca
- Posts: 3189
- Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
- Gender: Male
Re: Glasgow reject deal
I think it does take balls yesaiden01 wrote: ↑12 May 2023, 09:51Don,t understand how it takes balls its either a yes or a no.seems like a helluva lot of cwu members are voting no does that take balls also seeing leadership are recommending it.Acca Dacca wrote: ↑11 May 2023, 22:14It still takes balls for the branch to go against the leadership's recommendations no matter how you think the vote will goaiden01 wrote: ↑11 May 2023, 21:44What if the members of the glasgow branch come back with a yes vote will mean nothing.like ive already said members make their own minds up.if you have to rely on your branch telling you how to vote god help us all.im sure the branches rejecting the agreement now probably recommended most of the pec.
I would be easier for some of them to just ''play the game'' and go along with it
It’s easier to accept defeat and just take what’s on offer and move on with a crap deal than it is to vote no and take a gamble that we deserve and can do better than that
We don’t know what the future looks like without this agreement but we certainly know how the future looks like with it…..
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 11990
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
Re: Glasgow reject deal
Unless it's a close vote it doesn't matter what we in RDCs/Logistics/Distribution/MCs think as we're outnumbered by delivery staff by at least 3:1
I think RM will ram through a load more EA at some point whether it's a yes or no vote and I can't see them taking any notice of the union either way.
It seems like one of RM's long term goals is to have delivery staff basically spending just about their entire shift out on delivery
-
Acca Dacca
- Posts: 3189
- Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
- Gender: Male
Re: Glasgow reject deal
If they could ram everything they want through without difficulty they’d have done so by nowSpacePhoenix wrote: ↑12 May 2023, 11:32Unless it's a close vote it doesn't matter what we in RDCs/Logistics/Distribution/MCs think as we're outnumbered by delivery staff by at least 3:1
I think RM will ram through a load more EA at some point whether it's a yes or no vote and I can't see them taking any notice of the union either way.
It seems like one of RM's long term goals is to have delivery staff basically spending just about their entire shift out on delivery
It’s not as easy as some seem to think it is
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next