ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
New sick policy
-
k979aaa
- Posts: 12578
- Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
- Gender: Male
- Location: THE NORTH
Re: New sick policy
Thing is if this agreement fails it fails most on this and the pay not just the pay!
-
tractorboy2
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 535
- Joined: 18 Jan 2012, 11:03
- Gender: Male
Re: New sick policy
You have this wrong. It is in a 12 month period , so if your scenario plays out , the absence in June would be payed and the October would be 2 days unpaid.mmalecki88 wrote: ↑25 Apr 2023, 22:06Please imagine that if you go on sick in January, 11 months after in November (first 2 days unpaid) next sick 6/7 months later in June (again 2 days unpaid) and unfortunately after 5 months something happened and you have to go sick again in October straight away loosing first 4 days of sick absences.
That's absolutely not acceptable.
-
tractorboy2
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 535
- Joined: 18 Jan 2012, 11:03
- Gender: Male
Re: New sick policy
Postman B would trigger a stage though.Acca Dacca wrote: ↑25 Apr 2023, 18:49Its a stupid system we have in place where 1 day absence counts the same as 1 week absence
If this agreement comes in, Postman A could be off for 1 day and then 11 months later is sick for 2 days and these are unpaid whilst Postman B is off for 7 days and then later in the year off another 5 days - 2 of which are unpaid
Postman A is off for 3 days total and this counts as 2absences and he is paid only 1 of these days and loses 2 days pay
Postman B is off for 12 days total and this counts as 2 absences and he is paid 10 of these days and loses 2 days pay
It is absolutely ridiculous that this agreement stipulates that the first few days of the second absence is unpaid no matter how long or short the first absence was
-
DB1100
- Posts: 1976
- Joined: 10 Sep 2007, 14:30
Re: New sick policy
Hopefully in the future we might be able to claim for them, like the miners did with vibration white finger.Marshamp11 wrote: ↑25 Apr 2023, 17:59If there was any justice then some work related injuries like bad knees, feet, ankles etc, which have got worse over many years pounding the streets, should be deemed industrial injuries and have varying levels of compensation attached to them instead of being treated with "It comes with the job" type attitude.rubberbond wrote: ↑25 Apr 2023, 17:40I quite agree but if it’s a work related injury you should receive full pay, if there was any justice
For we were soldiers once,and young
-
mmalecki88
- Posts: 35
- Joined: 03 Jun 2016, 08:14
- Gender: Male
Re: New sick policy
October is before November my friendtractorboy2 wrote: ↑26 Apr 2023, 11:42You have this wrong. It is in a 12 month period , so if your scenario plays out , the absence in June would be payed and the October would be 2 days unpaid.mmalecki88 wrote: ↑25 Apr 2023, 22:06Please imagine that if you go on sick in January, 11 months after in November (first 2 days unpaid) next sick 6/7 months later in June (again 2 days unpaid) and unfortunately after 5 months something happened and you have to go sick again in October straight away loosing first 4 days of sick absences.
That's absolutely not acceptable.
In 12 months that will be 3 absences November/June/October
-
Marshamp11
- Posts: 437
- Joined: 06 Aug 2018, 16:38
- Gender: Male
Re: New sick policy
Its something the CWU should be fighting for.DB1100 wrote: ↑26 Apr 2023, 12:34Hopefully in the future we might be able to claim for them, like the miners did with vibration white finger.Marshamp11 wrote: ↑25 Apr 2023, 17:59If there was any justice then some work related injuries like bad knees, feet, ankles etc, which have got worse over many years pounding the streets, should be deemed industrial injuries and have varying levels of compensation attached to them instead of being treated with "It comes with the job" type attitude.rubberbond wrote: ↑25 Apr 2023, 17:40I quite agree but if it’s a work related injury you should receive full pay, if there was any justice
-
glynnlondon
- Posts: 36
- Joined: 30 Apr 2013, 14:18
- Gender: Male
Re: New sick policy
Rumour from our area rep about an amnesty on sick from 1 August.
Whether bs from him or royal mail who knows.
Deal is still s**t
Whether bs from him or royal mail who knows.
Deal is still s**t
-
tractorboy2
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 535
- Joined: 18 Jan 2012, 11:03
- Gender: Male
Re: New sick policy
You started this in January , when you get to June it is a new 12 months.mmalecki88 wrote: ↑26 Apr 2023, 16:37October is before November my friendtractorboy2 wrote: ↑26 Apr 2023, 11:42You have this wrong. It is in a 12 month period , so if your scenario plays out , the absence in June would be payed and the October would be 2 days unpaid.mmalecki88 wrote: ↑25 Apr 2023, 22:06Please imagine that if you go on sick in January, 11 months after in November (first 2 days unpaid) next sick 6/7 months later in June (again 2 days unpaid) and unfortunately after 5 months something happened and you have to go sick again in October straight away loosing first 4 days of sick absences.
That's absolutely not acceptable.
In 12 months that will be 3 absences November/June/October
-
mmalecki88
- Posts: 35
- Joined: 03 Jun 2016, 08:14
- Gender: Male
Re: New sick policy
Mate read this once again ther was sample on 4 sick absences on over 12 monthstractorboy2 wrote: ↑27 Apr 2023, 10:26You started this in January , when you get to June it is a new 12 months.mmalecki88 wrote: ↑26 Apr 2023, 16:37October is before November my friendtractorboy2 wrote: ↑26 Apr 2023, 11:42You have this wrong. It is in a 12 month period , so if your scenario plays out , the absence in June would be payed and the October would be 2 days unpaid.mmalecki88 wrote: ↑25 Apr 2023, 22:06Please imagine that if you go on sick in January, 11 months after in November (first 2 days unpaid) next sick 6/7 months later in June (again 2 days unpaid) and unfortunately after 5 months something happened and you have to go sick again in October straight away loosing first 4 days of sick absences.
That's absolutely not acceptable.
In 12 months that will be 3 absences November/June/October
January to November 2 absences in 12 months
November - June- October 3 absences in 12 months
October-march-september 3 absences 12 months
September - may 2 absences in 12 months
Attendece is counted from sick to sick in 12 months period not in calendar year.
Basically You can go sick only once in 12 months to get full pay.
-
tractorboy2
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 535
- Joined: 18 Jan 2012, 11:03
- Gender: Male
Re: New sick policy
The rolling period has to start somewhere ! I get what you're saying and if you are correct (you may well be) then how the hell is anyone prepared to accept this.mmalecki88 wrote: ↑27 Apr 2023, 19:00Mate read this once again ther was sample on 4 sick absences on over 12 monthstractorboy2 wrote: ↑27 Apr 2023, 10:26You started this in January , when you get to June it is a new 12 months.mmalecki88 wrote: ↑26 Apr 2023, 16:37October is before November my friendtractorboy2 wrote: ↑26 Apr 2023, 11:42You have this wrong. It is in a 12 month period , so if your scenario plays out , the absence in June would be payed and the October would be 2 days unpaid.mmalecki88 wrote: ↑25 Apr 2023, 22:06Please imagine that if you go on sick in January, 11 months after in November (first 2 days unpaid) next sick 6/7 months later in June (again 2 days unpaid) and unfortunately after 5 months something happened and you have to go sick again in October straight away loosing first 4 days of sick absences.
That's absolutely not acceptable.
In 12 months that will be 3 absences November/June/October
January to November 2 absences in 12 months
November - June- October 3 absences in 12 months
October-march-september 3 absences 12 months
September - may 2 absences in 12 months
Attendece is counted from sick to sick in 12 months period not in calendar year.
Basically You can go sick only once in 12 months to get full pay.
-
Johnrch8
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 23
- Joined: 15 May 2010, 07:58
- Gender: Male
Re: New sick policy
I’ve never liked the rolling twelve months or the fact they include days that you don’t work. The sick procedure should just be on sick periods and not have day ms included. That is what the police do
-
dazzler123
- Posts: 468
- Joined: 11 Oct 2021, 17:36
- Gender: Male
Re: New sick policy
My partner was off a few weeks back, and now has just broke his foot on delivery. is he in trouble?
-
CornishCracker
- Posts: 28
- Joined: 24 Jun 2014, 23:31
- Gender: Male
Re: New sick policy
If it was a workplace injury and he wasn't negligent then he should be fine.dazzler123 wrote: ↑27 Jul 2023, 17:30My partner was off a few weeks back, and now has just broke his foot on delivery. is he in trouble?
-
thefox
- Posts: 1112
- Joined: 24 Aug 2010, 20:09
- Gender: Male
Re: New sick policy
No doubt they will find a way for it to be his fault.CornishCracker wrote: ↑27 Jul 2023, 17:50If it was a workplace injury and he wasn't negligent then he should be fine.dazzler123 wrote: ↑27 Jul 2023, 17:30My partner was off a few weeks back, and now has just broke his foot on delivery. is he in trouble?