The "privatisation handbook" says the goal is to break up and destroy the company?
Something's off with your understanding and logic there.
The "privatisation handbook" says the goal is to break up and destroy the company?
That's pretty much it. There is absolutely no sign of any agreement and what is worse, RM have no desire for an agreement right now. They are playing a very long game, thinking about future generations and how they can remodel the business into another Amazon and are prepared to make enormous initial losses for the dream ticket that will milk the future generations
Oh give it up , they rode out Xmas for Christ sake , strike dates are irrelevant.claystones wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 06:07Striking after Easter is a joke the CWU should have announced dates last week (14 days notice) we could have announced Thursday before good friday and the saturday after plus the tuesday after easter monday which would have given us a nice break poor again by our union
That’s exactly what’s happening to the letters side of the business so no nothing wrong with my logic. I can’t believe people can’t see what happening it’s so obvious
Thanks.1617mel wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 09:14Rambo 1, your reply is acknowledged as being very informative I thank you for that, I reiterate my saying that all other parts of the workforce have been settled. I know striking is a last resort, and you are very correct in saying ,people have lost so much money from previous strike days, but we all see what's going on firsthand in our DOs , your suggestion going in work your hours , take your breaks , Finnish at the correct time, is very doable. But this would be spontaneous across the workforce, and if the implementation of annual hour which I'm in no doubt is one of RMs most wanted conditions is implemented, then the Finnish time per day becomes obsolete, I'm not an arguer person but I'm thinking a STRIKE motive will get RM backs up, it will get them worried over losing more business, this is not the way , as you are right it will affect the future, but so be it, and I may be wrong but if strike days are announced, I think a large amount of the workforce will comply not just for the unions sake but for our own sake..
Strikes are the only option we've got without a fresh ballotchickenwittle wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 09:26Oh give it up , they rode out Xmas for Christ sake , strike dates are irrelevant.claystones wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 06:07Striking after Easter is a joke the CWU should have announced dates last week (14 days notice) we could have announced Thursday before good friday and the saturday after plus the tuesday after easter monday which would have given us a nice break poor again by our union
Because that would be more contract hrs wouldn't it. If they want you to work longer days at peak times of the yr, they have to knock that off on slack times of the yr to get an average of your contract hrs.
Annualised hours would mean that walks would have to be different in the summer than in the winter, when you consider that many go over all year aroundrambo1 wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 09:48Thanks.1617mel wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 09:14Rambo 1, your reply is acknowledged as being very informative I thank you for that, I reiterate my saying that all other parts of the workforce have been settled. I know striking is a last resort, and you are very correct in saying ,people have lost so much money from previous strike days, but we all see what's going on firsthand in our DOs , your suggestion going in work your hours , take your breaks , Finnish at the correct time, is very doable. But this would be spontaneous across the workforce, and if the implementation of annual hour which I'm in no doubt is one of RMs most wanted conditions is implemented, then the Finnish time per day becomes obsolete, I'm not an arguer person but I'm thinking a STRIKE motive will get RM backs up, it will get them worried over losing more business, this is not the way , as you are right it will affect the future, but so be it, and I may be wrong but if strike days are announced, I think a large amount of the workforce will comply not just for the unions sake but for our own sake..
I think you're confusing annualised hrs with commit to deliver. Commit to deliver will never be agreed or voted in. It'd be suicide for us. Annualised hrs is simply working an hr or two a week longer in busy period, typically September to February then an hr or two less a week the other six months. Not sure how that would work with someone who wanted to take most of their leave in winter, they'd use more up but anyway, you'd still have start and finish times.
I agree, I’m talking about people moaning about the dates of the strike, it makes no difference,he’s clearly moaning because he’d like a nice break over Easter, pathetic.SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 10:00Strikes are the only option we've got without a fresh ballotchickenwittle wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 09:26Oh give it up , they rode out Xmas for Christ sake , strike dates are irrelevant.claystones wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 06:07Striking after Easter is a joke the CWU should have announced dates last week (14 days notice) we could have announced Thursday before good friday and the saturday after plus the tuesday after easter monday which would have given us a nice break poor again by our union
The walks (in theory) would be different in summer. They'd have less traffic! Whether they'd be completable in time is another matter. A bit like when they reduced our hrs but kept walks the same. All that happened was you either worked to time and had less hrs at work for the same pay or you claimed the overtime and got an (actual) pay rise.SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 10:13Annualised hours would mean that walks would have to be different in the summer than in the winter, when you consider that many go over all year aroundrambo1 wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 09:48Thanks.1617mel wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 09:14Rambo 1, your reply is acknowledged as being very informative I thank you for that, I reiterate my saying that all other parts of the workforce have been settled. I know striking is a last resort, and you are very correct in saying ,people have lost so much money from previous strike days, but we all see what's going on firsthand in our DOs , your suggestion going in work your hours , take your breaks , Finnish at the correct time, is very doable. But this would be spontaneous across the workforce, and if the implementation of annual hour which I'm in no doubt is one of RMs most wanted conditions is implemented, then the Finnish time per day becomes obsolete, I'm not an arguer person but I'm thinking a STRIKE motive will get RM backs up, it will get them worried over losing more business, this is not the way , as you are right it will affect the future, but so be it, and I may be wrong but if strike days are announced, I think a large amount of the workforce will comply not just for the unions sake but for our own sake..
I think you're confusing annualised hrs with commit to deliver. Commit to deliver will never be agreed or voted in. It'd be suicide for us. Annualised hrs is simply working an hr or two a week longer in busy period, typically September to February then an hr or two less a week the other six months. Not sure how that would work with someone who wanted to take most of their leave in winter, they'd use more up but anyway, you'd still have start and finish times.
Ffs going on strike is not about having a nice break.claystones wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 06:07Striking after Easter is a joke the CWU should have announced dates last week (14 days notice) we could have announced Thursday before good friday and the saturday after plus the tuesday after easter monday which would have given us a nice break poor again by our union