cantypeANDSHOUTS wrote:
as already said pinstripe when this flexability (which ive never heard about till this site,but ill take it as not another scare story)all we want is the workers to work the hour we pay them for.....well thats what makes it a buisness..are you saying you want money for nothing...wow union guy again....im inherantly lazy too but lets not bash the leaders for stating the obvious..........but this threads about cars....if you choose to be lazy and use your car you should be allowed(personal choice)if your managers say wow hes getting back 30minutes early lets add some more to his round...well its your own bloody fault ....And ofcoarse royal mails going to try to sqeeze as much out as possable its there jobs.....thats wot they get paid to do.....
I honestly cannot believe that you have not heard of the flexibility as it was such a contentious issue during and after the strikes last year.
I don't recall making any post where it could be implied that I want something for nothing. I work for Royal Mail and they pay me for the hours I work, that is where my loyalty to RM ends. Yes I am in the union, and like most union members I am more concerned about the decline of the service that RM are forcing us to deliver, than about my own personal situation, although most on here would agree that the decline in the service we provide and the decline in our terms and conditions are linked to RM's desire to run the company down in preparation for privatisation. You obviously don't see any problem with using a private car for deliveries, but this is just one more attempt by RM to cut costs and the service. I won't repeat the arguments against this as you've already decided you are right and everyone else is wrong.
In your next post you ask how a manager would know if you finished 30 minutes early. As 'job and finish' will end with the introduction of the local flexibility agreements, it is to be assumed that we would then have to travel back to the DO to finish our duty.
My original posting on this debate from quite a few months ago concerned the fact that RM have different rules for different areas. We have been told, for about the past 12 months that it was NOT Kent area policy for private cars to be used for the transportation of mail in any circumstances. Different areas have different policies, some people were being forced to use their own cars, some were being prevented from doing so.
I would ask you to provide some evidence that if people used their own cars, it would not cause job losses. I will not be drawn into a slagging match, you keep inferring that you want a reasoned debate, let's debate.