ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Over For The Union?

Pay talks 2022 discussion, news, LTB's RMCtv and all BUSINESS RECOVERY, TRANSFORMATION AND GROWTH AGREEMENT chat
Ppat98
Posts: 217
Joined: 27 Sep 2022, 15:08
Gender: Male

Re: Over For The Union?

Post by Ppat98 »

Schiff wrote:
11 Dec 2022, 12:08
Ppat98 wrote:
11 Dec 2022, 11:49
Come January/February if no deal has been reached it's likely many will lose faith in striking. At that point is the union done for?
I'm sure they will still have their role in helping us in our everyday office disputes but what happens if many people stop striking in January. Will it lead to them falling apart?
For the dispute to be over, more than 50% will have to vote in favour of accepting the surrender deal. I can't see that happening, but if it does then there will be no union - even to help with what you describe as everyday office disputes.

People need to realise that if they accept the surrender deal then they are also accepting every single change that currently only exist in Thompson's wet dreams. He will be free to drop our wages to minimum wage and change our terms and conditions as and when he sees fit. We will be unable to ever oppose him again as he will know that RM is staffed mainly by surrender monkeys who will drop any industrial action if he doesn't immediately give in.
Agree with everything you said. No union would be bleak times. I meant without voting though. Say if people just grow tired of striking & the numbers not showing up slowly increases. Seems like that would signal the end without a vote taking place or maybe they will have to accept the deal.
Hopefully it won't come to that. The union may have a few things planned to push Rm further.
rambo1
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 3266
Joined: 12 Jun 2013, 20:00
Gender: Male

Re: Over For The Union?

Post by rambo1 »

Ppat98 wrote:
11 Dec 2022, 13:58
Schiff wrote:
11 Dec 2022, 12:08
Ppat98 wrote:
11 Dec 2022, 11:49
Come January/February if no deal has been reached it's likely many will lose faith in striking. At that point is the union done for?
I'm sure they will still have their role in helping us in our everyday office disputes but what happens if many people stop striking in January. Will it lead to them falling apart?
For the dispute to be over, more than 50% will have to vote in favour of accepting the surrender deal. I can't see that happening, but if it does then there will be no union - even to help with what you describe as everyday office disputes.

People need to realise that if they accept the surrender deal then they are also accepting every single change that currently only exist in Thompson's wet dreams. He will be free to drop our wages to minimum wage and change our terms and conditions as and when he sees fit. We will be unable to ever oppose him again as he will know that RM is staffed mainly by surrender monkeys who will drop any industrial action if he doesn't immediately give in.
Agree with everything you said. No union would be bleak times. I meant without voting though. Say if people just grow tired of striking & the numbers not showing up slowly increases. Seems like that would signal the end without a vote taking place or maybe they will have to accept the deal.
Hopefully it won't come to that. The union may have a few things planned to push Rm further.
If they have plans, sure as hell would have been nice for them to have implemented them months ago! Like saving a big gun until half your infantry have been killed off .
Surreypostie
Posts: 999
Joined: 04 Aug 2013, 21:05
Gender: Male

Re: Over For The Union?

Post by Surreypostie »

Royal Mail actually need the union, they may not want to make agreements with them but they need them. Everything we do comes from collective bargaining, if there was no union to bargain with and do deals with then they would have to deal with 115,000 people individually.
Wolf91
Posts: 506
Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Over For The Union?

Post by Wolf91 »

clashcityrocker wrote:
11 Dec 2022, 12:41
If the CWU loses another 10 000 sub paying members will it be able to survive financially as an independent union?
Being facetious as usual there Clash. Remember they’ve just got a deal for BT/OpenReach too. I suspect you already knew that, though.
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16672
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: Over For The Union?

Post by clashcityrocker »

Wolf91 wrote:
11 Dec 2022, 14:54

Being facetious as usual there Clash. Remember they’ve just got a deal for BT/OpenReach too. I suspect you already knew that, though.
How is it being facetious?
Going back 10 years as a rep we were constantly told to ensure new members were introduced to the union to ensure the long term independence of the CWU.
Wasn't part of the rationale behind the coup that removed Billy Hayes and installed Ward the need to make savings at HQ and rationalise departments?
Why is Wimbledon up for sale?

If you think the loss of £2 million/year in subs is of no importance then you may have a rude awakening.
What exactly has the BT deal got to do with it?
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
mark.cup
Posts: 303
Joined: 14 Mar 2010, 20:54
Gender: Male

Re: Over For The Union?

Post by mark.cup »

The deal as I see it is still a pile if dog sh#t!

It will be April before we know it so a year of 2% and I maybe wrong but wasn't it 1% the year before....

You know year 2 of half the country hiding behind their sofas and us being 2nd class citizens (keyworkers) delivering not only endless amounts of crap but 750 million pounds plus in profits?

It's all the terms and conditions changes that need to go and how about a 10% payrise from April seeing as it's not being backdated.
needadvice
MDEC
Posts: 244
Joined: 20 Jun 2012, 23:39
Gender: Female

Re: Over For The Union?

Post by needadvice »

RM need to realise that the offer is a fantasy. The workforce is too large for there not to be an acceptable agreement on both sides. There must be some key names in that board room or shareholders who are against ST and his proposals. I would be amazed if there's no clashing of egos and visions behind closed doors. Do the right thing. We all know lower level managers agree to anything and will not resist even though deep down they know the proposals are very wrong. This fantasy needs to be quashed. They know we arnt being unreasonable, we just want a fair deal
Last edited by needadvice on 11 Dec 2022, 16:13, edited 1 time in total.
Schiff
Posts: 544
Joined: 01 Nov 2016, 22:02
Gender: Male

Re: Over For The Union?

Post by Schiff »

Surreypostie wrote:
11 Dec 2022, 14:50
Royal Mail actually need the union, they may not want to make agreements with them but they need them. Everything we do comes from collective bargaining, if there was no union to bargain with and do deals with then they would have to deal with 115,000 people individually.
No collective bargaining at Amazon. They simply tell their employees how its going to be, which is exactly what Thompson wants at RM.
Halfhappy
Posts: 389
Joined: 30 Jul 2021, 09:54
Gender: Male

Re: Over For The Union?

Post by Halfhappy »

Schiff wrote:
11 Dec 2022, 15:59
Surreypostie wrote:
11 Dec 2022, 14:50
Royal Mail actually need the union, they may not want to make agreements with them but they need them. Everything we do comes from collective bargaining, if there was no union to bargain with and do deals with then they would have to deal with 115,000 people individually.
No collective bargaining at Amazon. They simply tell their employees how its going to be, which is exactly what Thompson wants at RM.
I agree with this, on the whole, Schiff, but it's worth a mention that even Amazon is changing. I believe workers in Coventry, represented by the GMB, have recently voted for IA. I think the report I read, said it the first IA, in the UK, against Amazon.
Dorset Plodder
Posts: 4351
Joined: 29 Apr 2009, 20:05
Gender: Male

Re: Over For The Union?

Post by Dorset Plodder »

The Good News is ... Even the Strike Breakers are still paying Union Fees! :thumbup

The BIGGEST SB in my office is a CWU member ..... when the Rep stopped him on the picket line early on in this dispute he said he's resign from the Union. But he's still in it, paying his subs, because he's scared that one day he's going to get caught out on his dodgy work practices and RM will try and Discipline him .... Then he's going to coming looking for some support from the Union :shock: Ha Ha ! :cuppa
Like all Wage Slaves, he had two crosses to bear: The people he worked for and the people he worked with! (Stephen Vizinczey.)
Surreypostie
Posts: 999
Joined: 04 Aug 2013, 21:05
Gender: Male

Re: Over For The Union?

Post by Surreypostie »

Dorset Plodder wrote:
11 Dec 2022, 17:21
The Good News is ... Even the Strike Breakers are still paying Union Fees! :thumbup

The BIGGEST SB in my office is a CWU member ..... when the Rep stopped him on the picket line early on in this dispute he said he's resign from the Union. But he's still in it, paying his subs, because he's scared that one day he's going to get caught out on his dodgy work practices and RM will try and Discipline him .... Then he's going to coming looking for some support from the Union :shock: Ha Ha ! :cuppa
And,the union will have to give him that support as he is a paid up member. He should at least quit the union if he crosses the line.
hans solo
Posts: 3279
Joined: 06 Feb 2011, 18:08
Gender: Male

Re: Over For The Union?

Post by hans solo »

No they do not need to help
Reps can refuse
Dorset Plodder
Posts: 4351
Joined: 29 Apr 2009, 20:05
Gender: Male

Re: Over For The Union?

Post by Dorset Plodder »

Surreypostie wrote:
11 Dec 2022, 17:23

And,the union will have to give him that support as he is a paid up member. He should at least quit the union if he crosses the line.

I agree with him resigning from the Union if he's not willing to Strike (Never Has) but then that assumes he's got some morals. :cuppa
Like all Wage Slaves, he had two crosses to bear: The people he worked for and the people he worked with! (Stephen Vizinczey.)
jessicarabbit
Posts: 619
Joined: 05 Nov 2009, 19:57
Gender: Female

Re: Over For The Union?

Post by jessicarabbit »

Every member is entitled to representation.

Not every member gets the best representation.
Chitchat
Posts: 366
Joined: 30 Jan 2013, 15:18
Gender: Male

Re: Over For The Union?

Post by Chitchat »

It wont just be over for the union, it will also be over for us as well! (By that I mean, having a job and pay that anyway resembles what we have now).