ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Is the 500 pound lump sum self funded

Pay talks 2022 discussion, news, LTB's RMCtv and all BUSINESS RECOVERY, TRANSFORMATION AND GROWTH AGREEMENT chat
stevejm
Posts: 488
Joined: 09 Dec 2017, 16:16
Gender: Male

Re: Is the 500 pound lump sum self funded

Post by stevejm »

Binsey wrote:
27 Apr 2023, 14:06
Here endth the Third Lesson.
lol mate - not sure what point you are trying to make - but feel free to contribute something coherent, rational or informative. Or just tear down my argument with your reasoned argument.
stevejm
Posts: 488
Joined: 09 Dec 2017, 16:16
Gender: Male

Re: Is the 500 pound lump sum self funded

Post by stevejm »

denhamhoop wrote:
27 Apr 2023, 15:14
stevejm wrote:
27 Apr 2023, 13:50
dakka86 wrote:
27 Apr 2023, 13:34
chickenwittle wrote:
27 Apr 2023, 13:12
I tell you what is hard to grasp , the unions aspirations to take us down to a 35 hour week has somehow taken us up to 39 hours for a third of the year , brilliant negotiators.
It’s a complete con
We should not be starting it at the flex up period we will constantly be giving them time in lieu. Complete madness the union agreed to this
It's not madness when you realise that "the Union is all of us" is not a concept shared by the leadership of CWU. Their first priority is survival of the CWU. By their own words RM tried to de-unionise the workplace. That would mean a complete freefall in subs which would mean their £100,000 + salaries/perks/lifestyle would be threatened.
So - throw the membership under the bus to save the leadership.

It's either that or they suddenly forgot how to negotiate effectively. Do you think that is likely?
To be honest I don't think they have ever been able to negotiate effectively each single deal we give up more than we get in return and always for less than inflation pay rises to be fair this time they had little chance because Royal Mail were willing to throw Xmas under the bus to get the changes through they wanted. You cannot negotiate with someone not willing to budge an inch from "Their vision of the future"
The general consensus is that the CWU has spectacularly outdone itself this time - and what makes it worse is that we are seeing historically high inflation over a prolonged period.
Give us a decent pay rise with shit strings attached
or maybe give us a shitty pay deal with no strings attached

But do not, repeat, DO NOT - give us a SHIT PAY DEAL AND SHIT STRINGS ATTACHED
mjd24
Posts: 1402
Joined: 11 May 2008, 18:48

Re: Is the 500 pound lump sum self funded

Post by mjd24 »

Martin Walsh wrote:
27 Apr 2023, 17:09
52 weeks at 37 hours equals 1924 hours

The seasonal variations starts in September 2023 and runs to September 2024.

You will work 15 weeks at 39 hours equals 585 hours
You will work 15 weeks at 35 hours equals 525 hours
You will work 22 weeks at 37 hours equals 814 hours

Total 1024 hours the same.

Whilst annual leave is April to March our hours have never been linked to this period.

Those attendance patterns which have shorter Saturdays or longs and shorts will balance their hours over more than a week some patterns as long as 12 weeks.
Total 1924 hours the same i think you mean 🙄
mmalecki88
Posts: 35
Joined: 03 Jun 2016, 08:14
Gender: Male

Re: Is the 500 pound lump sum self funded

Post by mmalecki88 »

stevejm wrote:
27 Apr 2023, 18:31
denhamhoop wrote:
27 Apr 2023, 15:14
stevejm wrote:
27 Apr 2023, 13:50
dakka86 wrote:
27 Apr 2023, 13:34
chickenwittle wrote:
27 Apr 2023, 13:12
I tell you what is hard to grasp , the unions aspirations to take us down to a 35 hour week has somehow taken us up to 39 hours for a third of the year , brilliant negotiators.
It’s a complete con
We should not be starting it at the flex up period we will constantly be giving them time in lieu. Complete madness the union agreed to this
It's not madness when you realise that "the Union is all of us" is not a concept shared by the leadership of CWU. Their first priority is survival of the CWU. By their own words RM tried to de-unionise the workplace. That would mean a complete freefall in subs which would mean their £100,000 + salaries/perks/lifestyle would be threatened.
So - throw the membership under the bus to save the leadership.

It's either that or they suddenly forgot how to negotiate effectively. Do you think that is likely?
To be honest I don't think they have ever been able to negotiate effectively each single deal we give up more than we get in return and always for less than inflation pay rises to be fair this time they had little chance because Royal Mail were willing to throw Xmas under the bus to get the changes through they wanted. You cannot negotiate with someone not willing to budge an inch from "Their vision of the future"
The general consensus is that the CWU has spectacularly outdone itself this time - and what makes it worse is that we are seeing historically high inflation over a prolonged period.
Give us a decent pay rise with shit strings attached
or maybe give us a shitty pay deal with no strings attached

But do not, repeat, DO NOT - give us a SHIT PAY DEAL AND SHIT STRINGS ATTACHED
Totally agree if we get proper pay rise I could accept some changes. But what cwu did its shocking we will pay our payrise from our pockets.
mmalecki88
Posts: 35
Joined: 03 Jun 2016, 08:14
Gender: Male

Re: Is the 500 pound lump sum self funded

Post by mmalecki88 »

stevejm wrote:
27 Apr 2023, 18:31
denhamhoop wrote:
27 Apr 2023, 15:14
stevejm wrote:
27 Apr 2023, 13:50
dakka86 wrote:
27 Apr 2023, 13:34
chickenwittle wrote:
27 Apr 2023, 13:12
I tell you what is hard to grasp , the unions aspirations to take us down to a 35 hour week has somehow taken us up to 39 hours for a third of the year , brilliant negotiators.
It’s a complete con
We should not be starting it at the flex up period we will constantly be giving them time in lieu. Complete madness the union agreed to this
It's not madness when you realise that "the Union is all of us" is not a concept shared by the leadership of CWU. Their first priority is survival of the CWU. By their own words RM tried to de-unionise the workplace. That would mean a complete freefall in subs which would mean their £100,000 + salaries/perks/lifestyle would be threatened.
So - throw the membership under the bus to save the leadership.

It's either that or they suddenly forgot how to negotiate effectively. Do you think that is likely?
To be honest I don't think they have ever been able to negotiate effectively each single deal we give up more than we get in return and always for less than inflation pay rises to be fair this time they had little chance because Royal Mail were willing to throw Xmas under the bus to get the changes through they wanted. You cannot negotiate with someone not willing to budge an inch from "Their vision of the future"
The general consensus is that the CWU has spectacularly outdone itself this time - and what makes it worse is that we are seeing historically high inflation over a prolonged period.
Give us a decent pay rise with shit strings attached
or maybe give us a shitty pay deal with no strings attached

But do not, repeat, DO NOT - give us a SHIT PAY DEAL AND SHIT STRINGS ATTACHED
Totally agree if we get proper pay rise I could accept some changes. But what cwu did its shocking we will pay our payrise from our pockets.
sindba
Posts: 1442
Joined: 05 Feb 2012, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: Is the 500 pound lump sum self funded

Post by sindba »

stevejm wrote:
27 Apr 2023, 18:31

The general consensus is that the CWU has spectacularly outdone itself this time - and what makes it worse is that we are seeing historically high inflation over a prolonged period.
Give us a decent pay rise with shit strings attached
or maybe give us a shitty pay deal with no strings attached

But do not, repeat, DO NOT - give us a SHIT PAY DEAL AND SHIT STRINGS ATTACHED
:Applause
daveyeff
Posts: 4699
Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
Gender: Male

Re: Is the 500 pound lump sum self funded

Post by daveyeff »

Martin Walsh wrote:
27 Apr 2023, 17:09
52 weeks at 37 hours equals 1924 hours

The seasonal variations starts in September 2023 and runs to September 2024.

You will work 15 weeks at 39 hours equals 585 hours
You will work 15 weeks at 35 hours equals 525 hours
You will work 22 weeks at 37 hours equals 814 hours

Total 1024 hours the same.

Whilst annual leave is April to March our hours have never been linked to this period.

Those attendance patterns which have shorter Saturdays or longs and shorts will balance their hours over more than a week some patterns as long as 12 weeks.
but we don't work 52 weeks
kazardaimenu
Posts: 1391
Joined: 13 Apr 2022, 19:11
Gender: Male

Re: Is the 500 pound lump sum self funded

Post by kazardaimenu »

Yes. Robbing Peter to pay Paul.
squirrel67
Posts: 1
Joined: 22 Jan 2015, 17:59
Gender: Male

Re: Is the 500 pound lump sum self funded

Post by squirrel67 »

You will work 15 weeks at 39 hours equals 585 hours
You will work 15 weeks at 35 hours equals 525 hours
You will work 22 weeks at 37 hours equals 814 hours
Would it be fair to say most people would work just about all the longer 39 hour weeks as they are during the busy period where annual leave is unavailable,and most people will take annual leave during the 35 hour week period as its the summer,meaning we`ll lose out?
FilthyBloke
Posts: 685
Joined: 03 Jun 2018, 11:41
Gender: Male

Re: Is the 500 pound lump sum self funded

Post by FilthyBloke »

squirrel67 wrote:
27 Apr 2023, 19:39
You will work 15 weeks at 39 hours equals 585 hours
You will work 15 weeks at 35 hours equals 525 hours
You will work 22 weeks at 37 hours equals 814 hours
Would it be fair to say most people would work just about all the longer 39 hour weeks as they are during the busy period where annual leave is unavailable,and most people will take annual leave during the 35 hour week period as its the summer,meaning we`ll lose out?
Is there any clarity on this from either RM or the CWU?
rambo1
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 3266
Joined: 12 Jun 2013, 20:00
Gender: Male

Re: Is the £500 lump sum self funded

Post by rambo1 »

Jinder wrote:
27 Apr 2023, 11:22
smok3y666 wrote:
27 Apr 2023, 10:48
gb93 wrote:
27 Apr 2023, 10:42
Are we largely paying for the £500 lump sum payment ourselves in delivery by working extra hours this winter for free ?
It's not for free you do less in the summer. It's not hard to grasp the concept surely?
Until they want you to lapse
And then you work to time, again, not a hard concept to grasp.
NWpostie
Posts: 3587
Joined: 04 Aug 2007, 17:32
Gender: Male
Location: Sector 001 Borg Collective, 6 o f 9

Re: Is the 500 pound lump sum self funded

Post by NWpostie »

Time to stop coming in early and running around, using your own cars, you would only be making a rod for your own back.

Been saying this for ages and the runners listen.
Six of Nine loves Seven of Nine, together in Electric Dreams.
Martin Walsh
Posts: 4256
Joined: 19 Sep 2007, 20:12
Location: neverland

Re: Is the 500 pound lump sum self funded

Post by Martin Walsh »

Couple of things if your taking annual leave during the summer months your weeks leave will be 35 hours an annual leave is measured in hours.

Plus your paid 37 hours 52 weeks per year. So this will be the same.
gb93
Posts: 1462
Joined: 29 Oct 2009, 16:25
Gender: Male

Re: Is the 500 pound lump sum self funded

Post by gb93 »

What happens if you take annual leave during winter when its 39 hours
This ain't no baseball game, you get only one chance and you blew it.
mmalecki88
Posts: 35
Joined: 03 Jun 2016, 08:14
Gender: Male

Re: Is the 500 pound lump sum self funded

Post by mmalecki88 »

You will be charged 39h for week :dance