ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
1 van, 1 man!
-
therailway61
- Posts: 13
- Joined: 23 Feb 2020, 10:23
- Gender: Male
1 van, 1 man!
Alright it is pissing down in Portsmouth. But........Red RM van pulls up outside my house and passenger jumps out and delivers parcel while driver sits in the van. C'mon guys the fought for concession is there for your safety and the well being of your family and work mates. I nearly went out to have a word, words fail me. Stay Safe.
-
gand
- Posts: 253
- Joined: 10 Aug 2011, 17:36
- Gender: Male
1 van, 1 man!
You think that's bad i went home today because of lack of social distancing in my office. Only to get a phone call that i have to come back to work because my manager took a union rep around the building and the two of them without me being there decided that it was safe and i can come back to work. So i was forced by royal mail in conjunction with the cwu to put my families and my health at risk.therailway61 wrote:Alright it is pissing down in Portsmouth. But........Red RM van pulls up outside my house and passenger jumps out and delivers parcel while driver sits in the van. C'mon guys the fought for concession is there for your safety and the well being of your family and work mates. I nearly went out to have a word, words fail me. Stay Safe.
-
twoloops
- Posts: 2017
- Joined: 24 May 2017, 20:52
- Gender: Male
- Location: Sheffield
1 van, 1 man!
I didn’t name names, but asked my manager what is the process is, I had seen 2 vans with crews sitting side by side, he said “Well that up to them?” 
-
matthew68
- Posts: 516
- Joined: 16 Feb 2011, 22:10
- Gender: Male
1 van, 1 man!
No it isnt up to them report this to your rep or cwu directtwoloops wrote:I didn’t name names, but asked my manager what is the process is, I had seen 2 vans with crews sitting side by side, he said “Well that up to them?”
-
barcajr
- Posts: 168
- Joined: 12 Oct 2009, 01:04
- Gender: Male
1 van, 1 man!
In my office, the only van sharing is done by couples who already live together
-
clashcityrocker
- Posts: 16552
- Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
- Gender: Male
- Location: strummerville
1 van, 1 man!
And that too is expressly forbidden.barcajr wrote:In my office, the only van sharing is done by couples who already live together
One person one van. No exceptions.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
-
Postie45
- Posts: 2160
- Joined: 21 Aug 2012, 23:05
- Gender: Male
1 van, 1 man!
ok, so play their game, theyve decided at the time the cwu and manager walked around it was safe so go back to work, as soon as you see anything that breaches that safety raise it with rep, if it repeats then you will be justified in going home again as they cant provide a consistent level of safety across the day and only can provide it at certain times when its being directly managed.gand wrote:
You think that's bad i went home today because of lack of social distancing in my office. Only to get a phone call that i have to come back to work because my manager took a union rep around the building and the two of them without me being there decided that it was safe and i can come back to work. So i was forced by royal mail in conjunction with the cwu to put my families and my health at risk.
-
postslippete
- Posts: 4169
- Joined: 14 Jul 2014, 16:27
- Gender: Male
1 van, 1 man!
With all this sort of stuff going on,why are Royal Mail still allowed to run their business?
Maybe the CWU could go to the high/supreme court and get an injunction against Royal Mail for breaching the governments strict health and safety guidelines
Or maybe someone could film it and go to the paparazzi instead to name and shame. It would be easier.
Maybe the CWU could go to the high/supreme court and get an injunction against Royal Mail for breaching the governments strict health and safety guidelines
Or maybe someone could film it and go to the paparazzi instead to name and shame. It would be easier.
On the face of it, shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world.
-
aiden01
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 7001
- Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
- Gender: Male
1 van, 1 man!
Did you read ops post he actually says cwu rep agreed with manager that it was safe to work.postslippete wrote:With all this sort of stuff going on,why are Royal Mail still allowed to run their business?
Maybe the CWU could go to the high/supreme court and get an injunction against Royal Mail for breaching the governments strict health and safety guidelines![]()
Or maybe someone could film it and go to the paparazzi instead to name and shame. It would be easier.
-
aiden01
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 7001
- Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
- Gender: Male
1 van, 1 man!
Apologies it was second post in threadaiden01 wrote:Did you read ops post he actually says cwu rep agreed with manager that it was safe to work.postslippete wrote:With all this sort of stuff going on,why are Royal Mail still allowed to run their business?
Maybe the CWU could go to the high/supreme court and get an injunction against Royal Mail for breaching the governments strict health and safety guidelines![]()
Or maybe someone could film it and go to the paparazzi instead to name and shame. It would be easier.
-
therailway61
- Posts: 13
- Joined: 23 Feb 2020, 10:23
- Gender: Male
1 van, 1 man!
OK - Todays Update.
Lovely sunny day in Portsmouth 20 degrees. The Red RM Clown Bus pulls up outside, driver jumps out, passenger jumps out (could have been agency) and off they run to deliver their parcels. Can't be address specific for obvious reasons, but please Pompey MPU Reps have a word with your guys. Not too worried about these fools it is the others they may infect.
Lovely sunny day in Portsmouth 20 degrees. The Red RM Clown Bus pulls up outside, driver jumps out, passenger jumps out (could have been agency) and off they run to deliver their parcels. Can't be address specific for obvious reasons, but please Pompey MPU Reps have a word with your guys. Not too worried about these fools it is the others they may infect.
-
DGH
- Posts: 705
- Joined: 13 Dec 2014, 18:04
- Gender: Male
- Location: Neither here nor there
1 van, 1 man!
Why should that be forbidden? It makes no sense to forbid it.clashcityrocker wrote:And that too is expressly forbidden.barcajr wrote:In my office, the only van sharing is done by couples who already live together
One person one van. No exceptions.
-
Woody Guthrie
- Posts: 5166
- Joined: 29 Sep 2018, 20:47
- Gender: Male
1 van, 1 man!
The answer we got from senior management was public perception and office dynamics.DGH wrote:Why should that be forbidden? It makes no sense to forbid it.clashcityrocker wrote:And that too is expressly forbidden.barcajr wrote:In my office, the only van sharing is done by couples who already live together
One person one van. No exceptions.
It's not good for office moral if the only pair in the office who aren't impacted by the changes to procedure happen to be sleeping together.
In my humble opinion couples shouldn't be working together anyway.
Only dead fish follow the current
-
postslippete
- Posts: 4169
- Joined: 14 Jul 2014, 16:27
- Gender: Male
1 van, 1 man!
aiden01 wrote:Did you read ops post he actually says cwu rep agreed with manager that it was safe to work.postslippete wrote:With all this sort of stuff going on,why are Royal Mail still allowed to run their business?
Maybe the CWU could go to the high/supreme court and get an injunction against Royal Mail for breaching the governments strict health and safety guidelines![]()
Or maybe someone could film it and go to the paparazzi instead to name and shame. It would be easier.
I think the CWU are about as useful to us posties as a chocolate teapot during this crisis. From what I've seen at our depot social distancing is virtually impossible. For a start some of the aisles aren't even 2 metres wide!
On the face of it, shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world.
-
DGH
- Posts: 705
- Joined: 13 Dec 2014, 18:04
- Gender: Male
- Location: Neither here nor there
1 van, 1 man!
We have several couples in our office. One of them work together all the time. Nobody cares. Banning couples (or indeed any postmen who happen to merely flat share) from working together out of a van is inefficient.Woody Guthrie wrote:The answer we got from senior management was public perception and office dynamics.DGH wrote:Why should that be forbidden? It makes no sense to forbid it.clashcityrocker wrote:And that too is expressly forbidden.barcajr wrote:In my office, the only van sharing is done by couples who already live together
One person one van. No exceptions.
It's not good for office moral if the only pair in the office who aren't impacted by the changes to procedure happen to be sleeping together.
In my humble opinion couples shouldn't be working together anyway.
I'm not having a pop at you, Woody, I generally agree with you. However i n this case I genuinely don't understand the thinking