ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
Ren Hoëk
Posts: 737
Joined: 01 Feb 2018, 12:19
Gender: Male

Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..

Post by Ren Hoëk »

Barnacle wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 19:40
Would have thought it obvious why I wouldn’t post such information on here.

Believe what you want.
Is it because you made it up and it doesn't exist?
Barnacle
Posts: 2772
Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
Gender: Female
Location: Earth

Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..

Post by Barnacle »

Acca Dacca wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 19:55
Im not going to call you a liar Barnacle but I will say I dont believe you
Why on earth would you think I would comment on something so specific if it wasn’t something I knew about?

Ridiculous. Believe what you want.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
Barnacle
Posts: 2772
Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
Gender: Female
Location: Earth

Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..

Post by Barnacle »

Ren Hoëk wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 19:56
Barnacle wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 19:40
Would have thought it obvious why I wouldn’t post such information on here.

Believe what you want.
Is it because you made it up and it doesn't exist?
Thought you said you weren’t calling me a liar?

This is why you are completely unaware of any discrepancy between the experience of male and female employees, you just deny it exists.

Whatever
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
Ren Hoëk
Posts: 737
Joined: 01 Feb 2018, 12:19
Gender: Male

Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..

Post by Ren Hoëk »

Barnacle wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 20:10
Ren Hoëk wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 19:56
Barnacle wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 19:40
Would have thought it obvious why I wouldn’t post such information on here.

Believe what you want.
Is it because you made it up and it doesn't exist?
Thought you said you weren’t calling me a liar?

This is why you are completely unaware of any discrepancy between the experience of male and female employees, you just deny it exists.

Whatever
Where have I said im not calling you a liar?

You've made a pretty bold claim. Claim to have evidence. Asked to share it. Will not share it. Continue to deflect. You've put yourself in this little situation.
Barnacle
Posts: 2772
Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
Gender: Female
Location: Earth

Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..

Post by Barnacle »

Ren Hoëk wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 20:13
Barnacle wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 20:10
Ren Hoëk wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 19:56
Barnacle wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 19:40
Would have thought it obvious why I wouldn’t post such information on here.

Believe what you want.
Is it because you made it up and it doesn't exist?
Thought you said you weren’t calling me a liar?

This is why you are completely unaware of any discrepancy between the experience of male and female employees, you just deny it exists.

Whatever
Where have I said im not calling you a liar?

You've made a pretty bold claim. Claim to have evidence. Asked to share it. Will not share it. Continue to deflect. You've put yourself in this little situation.
I’m astounded you think it a ‘bold claim’ that there is a discrepancy in advancement between men and women at RM. It’s in evidence the world over and yet you doubt that it happens at all at RM because you have no experience of it?

Give your head a wobble.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
Ren Hoëk
Posts: 737
Joined: 01 Feb 2018, 12:19
Gender: Male

Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..

Post by Ren Hoëk »

Barnacle wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 20:21
Ren Hoëk wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 20:13
Barnacle wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 20:10
Ren Hoëk wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 19:56
Barnacle wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 19:40
Would have thought it obvious why I wouldn’t post such information on here.

Believe what you want.
Is it because you made it up and it doesn't exist?
Thought you said you weren’t calling me a liar?

This is why you are completely unaware of any discrepancy between the experience of male and female employees, you just deny it exists.

Whatever
Where have I said im not calling you a liar?

You've made a pretty bold claim. Claim to have evidence. Asked to share it. Will not share it. Continue to deflect. You've put yourself in this little situation.
I’m astounded you think it a ‘bold claim’ that there is a discrepancy in advancement between men and women at RM. It’s in evidence the world over and yet you doubt that it happens at all at RM because you have no experience of it?

Give your head a wobble.
No, you've claimed woman are overlooked when being made up to full time in Royal Mail and claim to have evidence. Its quite a specific thing. Lets have it?
Barnacle
Posts: 2772
Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
Gender: Female
Location: Earth

Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..

Post by Barnacle »

Ren Hoëk wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 20:32
Barnacle wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 20:21
Ren Hoëk wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 20:13
Barnacle wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 20:10
Ren Hoëk wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 19:56
Barnacle wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 19:40
Would have thought it obvious why I wouldn’t post such information on here.

Believe what you want.
Is it because you made it up and it doesn't exist?
Thought you said you weren’t calling me a liar?

This is why you are completely unaware of any discrepancy between the experience of male and female employees, you just deny it exists.

Whatever
Where have I said im not calling you a liar?

You've made a pretty bold claim. Claim to have evidence. Asked to share it. Will not share it. Continue to deflect. You've put yourself in this little situation.
I’m astounded you think it a ‘bold claim’ that there is a discrepancy in advancement between men and women at RM. It’s in evidence the world over and yet you doubt that it happens at all at RM because you have no experience of it?

Give your head a wobble.
No, you've claimed woman are overlooked when being made up to full time in Royal Mail and claim to have evidence. Its quite a specific thing. Lets have it?
Away and bully someone else. Don’t believe me.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
Ren Hoëk
Posts: 737
Joined: 01 Feb 2018, 12:19
Gender: Male

Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..

Post by Ren Hoëk »

Barnacle wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 20:44


Away and bully someone else. Don’t believe me.
Asking someone to clarify and substantiate a claim is not bullying.
Sean06
Posts: 2339
Joined: 20 Nov 2023, 16:50
Gender: Male

Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..

Post by Sean06 »

Just beginning to realise is ren hoek another name for im sure you can guess maybe a 5th account??its either his way or the highway lol
Sean06
Posts: 2339
Joined: 20 Nov 2023, 16:50
Gender: Male

Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..

Post by Sean06 »

yellowbelly wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 18:14
Sean06 wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 16:29
hewittinspain wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 15:33
chickenwittle wrote:
25 Jul 2025, 16:20
It will be a massive yes vote , the majority want a pay rise now the uso nonsense can take care of itself.
Not from my feedback it will be a massive yes. I work in a big office and I'd say a good 80% will definitely be voting no on the deal.
Have you asked them all??and are they just saying no but actually voting yes?
Or just forgetting/not bothering to vote at all?
Or are they actually members of cwu?not entitled to vote.
Sean06
Posts: 2339
Joined: 20 Nov 2023, 16:50
Gender: Male

Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..

Post by Sean06 »

hewittinspain wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 17:00
Sean06 wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 16:29
hewittinspain wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 15:33
chickenwittle wrote:
25 Jul 2025, 16:20
It will be a massive yes vote , the majority want a pay rise now the uso nonsense can take care of itself.
Not from my feedback it will be a massive yes. I work in a big office and I'd say a good 80% will definitely be voting no on the deal.
Have you asked them all??and are they just saying no but actually voting yes?
The rep sent printouts to the staff to ask what they would vote.
Never in 30 years have i heard such rubbish why would a rep go out of his way to do it.
Ren Hoëk
Posts: 737
Joined: 01 Feb 2018, 12:19
Gender: Male

Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..

Post by Ren Hoëk »

Sean06 wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 22:27
Just beginning to realise is ren hoek another name for im sure you can guess maybe a 5th account??its either his way or the highway lol
I'm sorry, Who am I also meant to be? Are you having paranoid delusions and seeing enemies everywhere? Maybe time to take a break.
hewittinspain
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 264
Joined: 20 May 2013, 21:24
Gender: Male

Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..

Post by hewittinspain »

Sean06 wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 22:32
hewittinspain wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 17:00
Sean06 wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 16:29
hewittinspain wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 15:33
chickenwittle wrote:
25 Jul 2025, 16:20
It will be a massive yes vote , the majority want a pay rise now the uso nonsense can take care of itself.
Not from my feedback it will be a massive yes. I work in a big office and I'd say a good 80% will definitely be voting no on the deal.
Have you asked them all??and are they just saying no but actually voting yes?
The rep sent printouts to the staff to ask what they would vote.
Never in 30 years have i heard such rubbish why would a rep go out of his way to do it.
Why have you worked in all offices?
I take it you're happy with 4.2% and then strings on the following two years after that?
thefox
Posts: 1146
Joined: 24 Aug 2010, 20:09
Gender: Male

Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..

Post by thefox »

Ren Hoëk wrote:
01 Aug 2025, 06:42
Sean06 wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 22:27
Just beginning to realise is ren hoek another name for im sure you can guess maybe a 5th account??its either his way or the highway lol
I'm sorry, Who am I also meant to be? Are you having paranoid delusions and seeing enemies everywhere? Maybe time to take a break.
Ignore the clown he specialises in snide posts,he's accusing you of being other posters but still denying he's that aiden character despite very similar posting style.
Barnacle
Posts: 2772
Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
Gender: Female
Location: Earth

Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..

Post by Barnacle »

hewittinspain wrote:
01 Aug 2025, 10:16
Sean06 wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 22:32
hewittinspain wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 17:00
Sean06 wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 16:29
hewittinspain wrote:
31 Jul 2025, 15:33
chickenwittle wrote:
25 Jul 2025, 16:20
It will be a massive yes vote , the majority want a pay rise now the uso nonsense can take care of itself.
Not from my feedback it will be a massive yes. I work in a big office and I'd say a good 80% will definitely be voting no on the deal.
Have you asked them all??and are they just saying no but actually voting yes?
The rep sent printouts to the staff to ask what they would vote.
Never in 30 years have i heard such rubbish why would a rep go out of his way to do it.
Why have you worked in all offices?
I take it you're happy with 4.2% and then strings on the following two years after that?
I think Sean06 is questioning why a rep would do a printed survey to find out how people will be voting. That is a bit odd and not something a rep should do really.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’